TL;DR: Steps taken to convert the Franssen effect into an experiment are described in order to study the localization precedence effect as it operates in rooms and suggest that there are two components to the illusion.
Abstract: The Franssen effect is an illusion that causes human listeners to make large errors in localizing a sound source. This paper describes steps taken to convert the illusion into an experiment in order to study the localization precedence effect as it operates in rooms. The results of the experiment suggest that there are two components to the illusion: The first is the inability of listeners to localize a sine tone in a room in the absence of an onset; the second is the obscuring of modulation cues by the irregular transient response of a room. Experiments show that the Franssen effect fails completely in anechoic environment, as expected if the effect depends upon the implausibility of steady‐state cues in a room. The Franssen effects also fails when the spectrum of the sound is dense.
TL;DR: The Franssen illusion is strongest for a live room and for midfrequency tones consistent with the difficulty listeners have in localizing sounds under these conditions.
Abstract: The relationship between localization and the Franssen effect was studied for noise and tones in a sound-deadened and in a live room. The noise was wideband and the tones were 250, 500, 1000, 1500, 2500, and 4000 Hz. Listeners were asked to determine the location of the stimuli in a localization task and to discriminate the difference between a pair of stimuli used to generate the Franssen illusion and a steady-state tone in a Franssen-effect discrimination task. Poor performance in the Franssen-effect discrimination task is consistent with the stimulus conditions leading to a strong Franssen illusion. Poor performance in both the Franssen effect and localization tasks was obtained for midfrequency tones (near 1500 Hz) and in the live room. Thus, the Franssen illusion is strongest for a live room and for midfrequency tones consistent with the difficulty listeners have in localizing sounds under these conditions. These results are consistent with those of Hartmann and Rakerd [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1366–1373 (1989)] and support their suggestion of a correlation between the Franssen effect and localization in rooms.
TL;DR: The results show that nonmammals also experience the FE illusion in confusing listening situations in a manner similar to mammals, suggestive of similar auditory processing mechanisms.
Abstract: The properties of the Franssen effect (FE) were measured in budgerigars and zebra finches. To elicit the FE, listeners are presented with a signal which has been split into a transient component, carrying an abrupt onset and ramped offset and separated in space from the sustained component which has a slowly rising onset and longer duration. When these two signals are played under certain conditions, the perception is that of a long-duration steady state tone being played at the location of the transient. The birds were trained using operant conditioning methods on a categorization task to peck a left key when presented with a stimulus from a left speaker and to peck a right key when presented with a stimulus from a right speaker. Once training was completed, FE stimuli were presented during a small proportion of trials. The FE was measured at speaker separations of 60 degrees and 180 degrees in both echoic and echoic-reduced conditions. Both species of birds exhibited the FE, although to varying degrees, across conditions. These results show that nonmammals also experience the FE illusion in confusing listening situations in a manner similar to mammals, suggestive of similar auditory processing mechanisms.
TL;DR: The frequencies for eliciting the FE in cats were higher than in humans, corresponding to frequencies where cats have difficulty localizing pure tones, strengthening the hypothesis that difficulty in accurately localizing sounds is the basis for the FE.
Abstract: The Franssen Effect (FE) is a striking auditory illusion previously demonstrated only in humans. To elicit the FE, subjects are presented with two spatially-separated sounds; one a transient tone with an abrupt onset and immediate ramped offset and the other a sustained tone of the same frequency with a ramped onset which remains on for several hundred ms. The FE illusion occurs when listeners localize the tones at the location of the transient signal, even though that sound has ended and the sustained one is still present. The FE illusion occurs most readily in reverberant environments and with pure tones of approximately 1-2.5 kHz in humans, conditions where sound localization is difficult in humans. Here, we demonstrate this illusion in domestic cats using, for the first time, localization procedures. Previous studies in humans employed discrimination procedures, making it difficult to link the FE to sound localization mechanisms. The frequencies for eliciting the FE in cats were higher than in humans, corresponding to frequencies where cats have difficulty localizing pure tones. These findings strengthen the hypothesis that difficulty in accurately localizing sounds is the basis for the FE.
TL;DR: It is concluded that the primary auditory cortex is the most plausible site of the mechanism leading to the FE, and the mechanism underlying this illusion modifies the neural representation of the stimulus with FE in such a way that it becomes similar to that of the stimuli without FE before reaching the input of the preattentive mechanism indexed by the MMN.