About: Framing (construction) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3587 publications have been published within this topic receiving 29228 citations.
TL;DR: Experimenter demand effects refer to changes in behavior by experimental subjects due to cues about what constitutes appropriate behavior as mentioned in this paper, and they can either be social or purely cognitive, and when they may exist, it crucially matters how they relate to the true experimental objectives.
Abstract: Experimenter demand effects refer to changes in behavior by experimental subjects due to cues about what constitutes appropriate behavior. We argue that they can either be social or purely cognitive, and that, when they may exist, it crucially matters how they relate to the true experimental objectives. They are usually a potential problem only when they are positively correlated with the true experimental objectives’ predictions, and we identify techniques such as non-deceptive obfuscation to minimize this correlation. We discuss the persuasiveness or otherwise of defenses that can be used against demand effects criticisms when such correlation remains an issue.
TL;DR: In this paper, an elaborated framing model is presented, and subsequently the constructionist approach is compared with priming and agenda setting, in order to develop a strategy to reconstruct frame packages.
Abstract: This article aims, within the constructionist paradigm, at integrating culture into the framing process. Four characteristics are important for this approach: the distinction between the event, the media content, and the frame; the explicit attention to the reconstruction of frame packages; the relationship between frame packages and cultural phenomena; and the interaction between frame sponsors, key events, media content, schemata, and the stock of frames. An elaborated framing model is presented, and, subsequently, the constructionist approach is compared with priming and agenda setting. Finally, the methodological implications are discussed, in order to develop a strategy to reconstruct frame packages.
TL;DR: This article examined whether certain biases in probability assessments and perceptions of loss, previously found in experimental studies, affect consumers' decisions about insurance and found that these biases lead the consumers studied here to make hypothetical insurance-purchase choices that violate basic laws of probability and value.
Abstract: A series of studies examines whether certain biases in probability assessments and perceptions of loss, previously found in experimental studies, affect consumers’ decisions about insurance. Framing manipulations lead the consumers studied here to make hypothetical insurance-purchase choices that violate basic laws of probability and value. Subjects exhibit distortions in their perception of risk and framing effects in evaluating premiums and benefits. Illustrations from insurance markets suggest that the same effects occur when consumers make actual insurance purchases.
TL;DR: In this article, a formal system model is used as a framing device to deliver the benefits of taking account of critical success factors while avoiding the problems associated with "critical success factors" that give rise to the criticisms.
TL;DR: In this article , the characteristics and distinct contributions of bibliometric research are discussed and a multifaceted approach that researchers can utilize to develop and demonstrate the potential contributions of their bibliometrics research and referees (e.g., editors and reviewers) can rely on to effectively decipher and evaluate the framing, positioning, and contributions of Bibliometrical research.
Abstract: Bibliometric research presents unique opportunities to contribute to theory and practice. Top journals and scholars from various disciplines have published numerous highly impactful articles utilizing bibliometric techniques to study different fields’ evolutionary nuances and capture emerging trends. However, studies using bibliometric techniques have often attracted criticism for failing to adequately link their derived analytical and visual outputs with theory building and practice improvement. Consequently, we ask the following question: How can bibliometric research contribute to theory and practice? To this end, this editorial (i) premiers the characteristics and distinct contributions of bibliometric research and (ii) proposes a multifaceted approach that (a) researchers can utilize to develop and demonstrate the potential contributions of their bibliometric research and (b) referees (e.g., editors and reviewers) can rely on to effectively decipher and evaluate the framing, positioning, and contributions of bibliometric research. In doing so, we hope to enhance the understanding and contributions of bibliometric research in advancing theory and practice.