Fracture zone

Abstract: Seismic data strongly support recent theories of tectonics in which large plates of lithosphere move coherently with respect to one another as nearly rigid bodies, spreading apart at ocean ridges, sliding past one another at transform faults, and underthrusting at island arcs. Boundaries between adjacent plates of lithosphere are defined by belts of high seismic activity. Redetermination of more than 600 hypocenters in the Middle America region and previous studies in the Galapagos and Caribbean regions define the boundaries of two relatively small, nearly aseismic plates in the region of interest. The first, the Cocos plate, is bordered by the East Pacific rise, the Galapagos rift zone, the north-trending Panama fracture zone near 82° W., and the Middle America arc; the second, the Caribbean plate, underlies the Caribbean Sea and is bounded by the Middle America arc, the Cayman trough, the West Indies arc, and the seismic zone through northern South America. Focal mechanisms of 70 earthquakes in these regions were determined to ascertain the relative motion of these two plates with respect to the surrounding regions or plates. The results show underthrusting of the Cocos plate beneath Mexico and Guatemala in a northeasterly direction and beneath the rest of Central America in a more north-northeasterly direction. The Cocos plate is spreading away from the rest of the Pacific floor at the East Pacific rise and at the Galapagos rift zone. Motion is right-lateral strike-slip along the Panama fracture zone, a transform fault connecting the Galapagos rift zone and the Middle America arc. At the same time, the Caribbean plate is moving easterly with respect to the Americas plate, which is here taken to include both North and South America and the western Atlantic. Left-lateral strike-slip motion along steeply dipping fault planes is observed on the Cayman trough. The Americas plate is underthrusting the Caribbean in a westerly direction at the Lesser Antilles and near Puerto Rico. Unlike the Lesser Antilles, however, motion at present is not perpendicular to the Puerto Rico trench but instead is almost parallel to the trench along nearly horizontal fault planes. Computations of rates of motion indicate that underthrusting is at a higher rate in southeastern Mexico and Guatemala than in western Mexico and that the Caribbean is moving at a lower rate relative to North America than is the Cocos plate.

Abstract: Magnetic anomaly and fracture zone information is used to develop a self-consistent tectonic history of the Indian and South Atlantic oceans. Working backward in time we have made three reasonably well constrained (39, 53, and 65 Ma) and two speculative (80 and 115 Ma) reconstructions of the positions of the Gondwana continents (Ma is m.y.B.P.). Our final fit, which is constrained by the recognition of Mesozoic anomalies off Antarctica and in the Mozambique Basin, places Dronning Maud Land against southern Mozambique and Madagascar in the northern position against Kenya. We suggest that after the initial rifting, Antarctica moved away from Africa in a southerly direction relative to present-day Africa. This started the formation of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Most of the present length and geometry of the ridge result from migration of triple junctions so do not reflect predrift continental outlines. India and Madagascar moved with Antarctica until India separated from first Antarctica then Madagascar, when it started moving north toward Asia. In our reconstructions we find no necessity for significant relative motion between the Antarctic Peninsula and South America from the early Cretaceous to the Oligocene. From the breakup of Gondwanaland to the present we identify seven significant events. These are (1) first break in the late Triassic/early Jurassic between East and West Gondwanaland with initial motion along long transform faults parallel to the present African east coast, (2) early Cretaceous separation of Africa and South America and possibly simultaneous separation between India and Australia-Antarctica, (3) cessation of motion between Africa and Madagascar, (4) break between India and Madagascar in the late Cretaceous, (5) Paleocene reorganization in the northwest Indian Ocean when the Seychelles left India, (6) Eocene separation between Australia and Antarctica with Australia joining the Indian plate, and (7) India's collision with Asia and subsequent commencement of spreading on the Central Indian Ridge, and later opening of Drake Passage.

Abstract: The 1900-km-long, trench-parallel Sumatran fault accommodates a significant amount of the right-lateral component of oblique convergence between the Eurasian and Indian/Australian plates from 10°N to 7°S. Our detailed map of the fault, compiled from topographic maps and stereographic aerial photographs, shows that unlike many other great strike-slip faults, the Sumatran fault is highly segmented. Cross-strike width of step overs between the 19 major subaerial segments is commonly many kilometers. The influence of these step overs on historical seismic source dimensions suggests that the dimensions of future events will also be influenced by fault geometry. Geomorphic offsets along the fault range as high as ~20 km and may represent the total offset across the fault. If this is so, other structures must have accommodated much of the dextral component of oblique convergence during the past few million years. Our analysis of stretching of the forearc region, near the southern tip of Sumatra, constrains the combined dextral slip on the Sumatran and Mentawai faults to be no more than 100 km in the past few million years. The shape and location of the Sumatran fault and the active volcanic arc are highly correlated with the shape and character of the underlying subducting oceanic lithosphere. Nonetheless, active volcanic centers of the Sumatran volcanic arc have not influenced noticeably the geometry of the active Sumatran fault. On the basis of its geologic history and pattern of deformation, we divide the Sumatran plate margin into northern, central and southern domains. We support previous proposals that the geometry and character of the subducting Investigator fracture zone are affecting the shape and evolution of the Sumatran fault system within the central domain. The southern domain is the most regular. The Sumatran fault there comprises six right-stepping segments. This pattern indicates that the overall trend of the fault deviates 4° clockwise from the slip vector between the two blocks it separates. The regularity of this section and its association with the portion of the subduction zone that generated the giant (M_w 9) earthquake of 1833 suggest that a geometrically simple subducting slab results in both simple strike-slip faulting and unusually large subduction earthquakes.