Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Foundation (engineering)
  4. 2005
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Foundation (engineering)
  4. 2005
Showing papers on "Foundation (engineering) published in 2005"
Journal Article•10.1680/GEOT.2005.55.4.287•
Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations

[...]

Guy T. Houlsby, R. B. Kelly, J. Huxtable, Byron W. Byrne
01 May 2005-Geotechnique
TL;DR: In this article, a program of testing on suction caisson foundations in an artificially prepared sand test bed near Luce Bay, in Scotland, is described, with the results relevant to the design of either monopod or quadruped foundations for offshore wind turbines.
Abstract: A programme of testing on suction caisson foundations in an artificially prepared sand test bed near Luce Bay, in Scotland, is described The tests are relevant to the design of either monopod or quadruped foundations for offshore wind turbines Records are presented for suction installation of the caissons, cyclic moment loading under both quasi-static and dynamic conditions to simulate the behaviour of a monopod foundation, and cyclic vertical loading and pullout of caissons to simulate one footing in a quadruped foundation Variations of stiffness with loading level of the foundation are observed, with high initial stiffness followed by hysteretic behaviour at moderate loads and degradation of response at high loads Some implications for the design of wind turbine foundations are briefly discussed

210 citations

Journal Article•10.1002/PSE.202•
Beams and plates on elastic foundations: a review

[...]

Y H Wang1, Leslie George Tham2, Y.K. Cheung2•
Huazhong University of Science and Technology1, University of Hong Kong2
01 Oct 2005-Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials
TL;DR: A review of the state-of-the-art in this field can be found in this article, highlighting the key areas of development, including the modelling of the soil media and various analytical as well as numerical approaches in analysing the interaction action between the foundation and soil.
Abstract: The interaction action between structures and supporting soil media is of fundamental importance in foundation design and it has always attracted the attention of both researchers and engineers. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art in this field, highlighting the key areas of development, including the modelling of the soil media and various analytical as well as numerical approaches in analysing the interaction action between the foundation and soil. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

203 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/J.GEOTEXMEM.2004.10.001•
Design and behaviour of a geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall and bridge abutment on a yielding foundation

[...]

Graeme D. Skinner1, R. Kerry Rowe2•
Golder Associates1, Queen's University2
01 Jun 2005-Geotextiles and Geomembranes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the numerical analysis of a 6-m high geosynthetic reinforced soil wall supporting a bridge abutment and approach road constructed on a 10-m thick yielding clayey soil deposit.

155 citations

Journal Article•10.1680/GRIM.2005.9.4.137•
Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil

[...]

Tahar Ayadat, Adel Hanna
1 Oct 2005
TL;DR: In this article, the performance of columns made of sand were tested with different lengths, degrees of inundation and different strengths of geofabric reinforcement, and the carrying capacity of the columns and their settlement characteristics were investigated.
Abstract: Quite often, foundation engineers encounter a thick layer of collapsible soil. This type of soil possesses considerable strength, which is largely lost when the soil becomes wet. Excessive settlement and lateral deformation accompany this significant loss in strength. As an alternative to conventional deep foundations, stone columns encapsulated in geofabric reinforcement may be used to transmit foundation loads to suitable bearing strata below the collapsible soil layer. This paper presents an experimental investigation on the performance of stone columns encapsulated in geofabric installed in a collapsible soil layer and subjected to inundation. The carrying capacity of the columns and their settlement characteristics were investigated. Columns made of sand were tested with different lengths, degrees of inundation and different strengths of geofabric. Based on the results of the present experimental investigation, it can be reported that unreinforced sand columns in collapsible soil did not contribute s...

132 citations

Book•
Analysis and Design of Shallow and Deep Foundations

[...]

Lymon C. Reese, William M. Isenhower
25 Nov 2005
TL;DR: Preface Acknowledgments Symbols and Notations Chapter
Abstract: Preface Acknowledgments Symbols and Notations Chapter

119 citations

Book•10.4324/9781849772570•
Felt knowing: A foundation for local government practice

[...]

Gregory M Walkerden
1 Jan 2005

106 citations

10.3233/978-1-61499-656-9-123•
Challenges of offshore geotechnical engineering

[...]

Mark Randolph, Mark Cassidy, Susan Gourvenec, Carl Erbrich
1 Sep 2005
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe design principles for foundation and anchoring systems ranging from shallow footings to piles and caissons, highlighting differences between onshore and offshore practice and also the link (or gap) between research and practice.
Abstract: Design practice in offshore geotechnical engineering grew out of onshore practice, but the two application areas have tended to diverge over the last 30 years, driven partly by the scale of the foundation elements used offshore, and partly by fundamental differences in construction (or installation) techniques. Groups of many moderate-sized piles are replaced by a few very large diameter piles; excavation of shallow soft sediments is replaced by the use of deep skirts, transferring the effective foundation depth to the level of the skirt tips, or by forcing footings to penetrate several diameters into the seabed; underwater installation has allowed the use of 'suction' (or under-pressure) to aid installation of skirted foundations and caissons. Emphasis in design is focused more on capacity, paying particular attention to the effects of cyclic loading but generally with less concern on deformations compared with onshore design. These differences have led to the development of separate design codes for offshore structures, which are in most cases more prescriptive than onshore codes but are also more sophisticated in key areas. The paper describes design principles for foundation and anchoring systems ranging from shallow footings to piles and caissons, highlighting differences between onshore and offshore practice and also the link (or gap) between research and practice.

103 citations

Book•
Foundation Engineering Handbook: Design and Construction with 2006 International Building Code

[...]

Robert W Day
21 Nov 2005
TL;DR: The Foundation Engineering Handbook as discussed by the authors is a complete tool for designing and engineering foundations, with engineering data, procedures and calculations necessary to comply with international building codes, including International Building Code Regulations for Soil and International Building Codes Regulations for Foundations.
Abstract: Created as a comprehensive tool for designing and engineering foundations, the Foundation Engineering Handbook is a complete resource with engineering data, procedures and calculations necessary to comply with international building codes. Divided into four parts, the wide ranging topics include: 1. Geotechnical Engineering featuring Subsurface Exploration, Laboratory Testing and Soil Mechanics; 2. Foundation Design detailing Shallow and Deep Foundations, Bearing Capacity of Foundations, Settlement of Foundations, Consolidation, Foundations on Expansive Soil, Slope Stability, Retaining Walls, Foundation Deterioration and Cracking, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering for Soils and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering for Foundations and Retaining Walls; 3. Foundation Construction incorporating Grading and Other Soil Improvement Methods, Foundation Excavation, Underpinning and Field Load Tests, and Geosynthetics and Instrumentation; and 4. International Building Codes including International Building Code Regulations for Soil and International Building Codes Regulations for Foundations.

95 citations

Proceedings Article•10.1061/40783(162)20•
Foundation of Constructions on Very Soft Soils with Geotextile Encased Columns - State of the Art

[...]

M. Raithel, A. Kirchner, C. Schade, E. Leusink
9 Oct 2005
TL;DR: In this article, Raithel et al. described the essential main features of the calculation of the bearing and deformation behavior of the geotextile encased columns (GEC) and compared the gained settlement reduction between encased and non-encased columns.
Abstract: Foundation systems with geotextile encased columns (GEC) are used for soil improvement and primarily for road embankment foundations in Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands since almost 10 years (Raithel et al, 2004), but latterly they are also used in dike construction. In this paper the essential main features of the calculation of the bearing and deformation behaviour are described. Further the know-how gained by using the different installation methods and measurement results of the foundation system ‘geotextile encased columns’ are discussed. Also a comparison of the gained settlement reduction between encased and non-encased columns (i.e. granualar piles) will be shown. Bearing System GEC and calculation model Bearing System GEC With the foundation system GEC gravel-sand-columns are installed into a bearing layer to relieve the load on the soft soils. Different installation methods are thereby used. Due to the geotextile casing in combination with the surrounding soft soils the column has a radial support, whereas the casing is strained by ring tensile forces (Raithel et al, 2004). Due to the supporting effects of the casing, a special range of application, in opposite to conventional column foundations (i.e. granualar piles), is in very soft soils (cu < 15 kN/m²) like peat or very soft silt/clay as well as sludge. As opposed to conventional stone column foundations, geotextile encased sand or gravel columns can be used as a ground improvement method for very soft soils. By a non -encased column, the horizontal support of the soft soil must be equal to the horizontal pressure in the column. By a GEC, the horizontal support of the soft soil can be much lower, due to the radial supporting effect of the geotextile casing. The horizontal support depends also on the vertical pressure over the soft soil, which can be much smaller. As a result a stress concentration on the column head and a lower vertical pressure over the soft soil and therefore a large settlement reduction is o btained. To withstand the high ring tension forces, the geotextile casings are manufactured seamlessly. The columns act simultaneously as ve rtical drains, but the main effect is the load transfer to a deeper bearing layer. The GEC are arranged in a regular column grid. Based on the unit cell concept, a single column in a virtual infinite

82 citations

Journal Article•10.1139/T05-004•
Foundation design for the Emirates Twin Towers, Dubai

[...]

Harry G. Poulos, Andrew J Davids
01 Jun 2005-Canadian Geotechnical Journal
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the foundation design process adopted for two high-rise buildings in Dubai, the Emirates Twin Towers, and the foundation system for each of the towers was a piled raft, founded on...
Abstract: This paper describes the foundation design process adopted for two high-rise buildings in Dubai, the Emirates Twin Towers. The foundation system for each of the towers was a piled raft, founded on ...

79 citations

Journal Article•10.1093/EHR/CEI334•
Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents

[...]

James Howard-Johnston1•
University of Oxford1
01 Sep 2005-The English Historical Review
Journal Article•
The Semiotics of Time Structure in Ludic Space As a Foundation for Analysis and Design.

[...]

Craig A. Lindley
01 Jan 2005-Game Studies
Journal Article•
National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand

[...]

Andrew Tonkin, Philip J. Barter, James D. Best, Andrew Boyden, John Furler, K Hossack, David R. Sullivan 
01 Jan 2005-Heart Lung and Circulation
Journal Article•
Broadening Our Foundation for Instructional Design: Four Pillars of Practice

[...]

Brent G. Wilson
01 Jan 2005-Educational Technology archive
Book•
The Invention of Terra Nullius: Historical and Legal Fictions on the Foundation of Australia

[...]

Michael Connor
1 Jan 2005
Journal Article•10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(274)•
Interface Characteristics and Laboratory Constructability Tests of Novel Fiber-Reinforced Polymer/Concrete Piles

[...]

M. Sakr, M. H. El Naggar1, Moncef L. Nehdi•
University of Western Ontario1
01 Jun 2005-Journal of Composites for Construction
TL;DR: In this article, an experimental study on frictional FRP/dense sand interface characteristics and the constructability of FRP-concrete composite piles is presented. But the experimental program involves interface shear tests on small FRP samples and uplift load tests on large-scale model piles.
Abstract: Conventional pile materials such as steel, concrete, and timber are prone to deterioration for many reasons. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) concrete composites represent an alternative construction material for deep foundations that can eliminate many of the performance disadvantages of traditional piling materials. However, FRP composites present several difficulties related to constructability, and the lack of design tools for their implementation as a foundation element. This paper describes the results of an experimental study on frictional FRP/dense sand interface characteristics and the constructability of FRP–concrete composite piles. An innovative toe driving technique is developed to install the empty FRP shells in the soil and self-consolidating concrete is subsequently cast in them. The experimental program involves interface shear tests on small FRP samples and uplift load tests on large-scale model piles. Two different FRP pile materials with different roughness and a reference steel pile are...
Foundation to MEMS

[...]

Chang Liu
1 Aug 2005
Evaluation of Capacity of Rock Foundation Sockets

[...]

Fred H. Kulhawy1, Sami O. Akbas1, Widjojo Adi Prakoso2•
Cornell University1, University of Indonesia2
1 Jan 2005
Journal Article•10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(1014)•
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Anisotropic Non-Hoek–Brown Rock Masses

[...]

Mahendra Singh1, Mahendra Singh2, K. Seshagiri Rao1, K. Seshagiri Rao2•
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi1, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee2
01 Aug 2005-Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a method to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of non-Hoek-Brown rock masses using a simple parabolic equation to define the strength criterion.
Abstract: Rocks available for the foundations of civil engineering structures are often jointed and behave anisotropically. This paper presents a method to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of non-Hoek-Brown rock masses. The method makes use of the mapping of joints in the field and simple laboratory tests on intact specimens of rock. Charts can be used to simplify computations in the field. The method uses Bell's approach of computing bearing capacity, in which the ultimate bearing capacity is determined as the major principal stress at failure under a confining pressure acting on the mass beneath a smooth foundation. A simple parabolic equation is used to define the strength criterion. The uniaxial compressive strength of the jointed rock mass, which is an input parameter to the strength criterion, is determined using the joint factor concept.
Journal Article•10.3208/SANDF.45.4_133•
Seismic Effective-Stress Analysis of Caisson Quay Walls: Application to Kobe

[...]

Panos Dakoulas1, George Gazetas2•
University of Thessaly1, National Technical University of Athens2
01 Aug 2005-Soils and Foundations
TL;DR: In this article, an effective-stress analysis method based on an elasto-plastic constitutive model formulated into a finite-difference algorithm was proposed for gravity quay-walls.
Book•
Investigation of soil-flexible foundation-structure interaction for incident plane SH waves

[...]

Vlado Givec
1 Jan 2005
Posted Content•
Statistical Mechanics of Jammed Matter

[...]

Hernán A. Makse1, Jasna Brujic2, Sam F. Edwards2•
City College of New York1, University of Cambridge2
03 Mar 2005-arXiv: Soft Condensed Matter
TL;DR: In this paper, a thermodynamic formulation of jammed matter is reviewed and experiments and simulations of compressed emulsions and granular materials are used to provide a foundation for the thermodynamics.
Abstract: A thermodynamic formulation of jammed matter is reviewed. Experiments and simulations of compressed emulsions and granular materials are then used to provide a foundation for the thermodynamics.
Book Chapter•10.1201/NOE0415374521.CH171•
Three-dimensional numerical simulation of tunnel advancement on adjacent pile foundation

[...]

C. H. Pang, Yean Khow Chow, K Yong
11 Apr 2005
Journal Article•
Clinical considerations for densely sintered alumina and zirconia restorations: part 2.

[...]

Avishai Sadan1, Markus B. Blatz, Brien R. Lang2•
Case Western Reserve University1, University of Michigan2
01 Aug 2005-International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide guidelines for lamination of the densely sintered alumina- and zirconia-based restorations and proper try-in, and examine options for conventional and adhesive luting procedures.
Abstract: Part 1 of this series provided the foundation for understanding the nature of densely sintered alumina- and zirconia-based restorations, provided guidelines for case selection, and addressed framework design considerations. This article discusses guidelines for lamination of the densely sintered alumina- and zirconia-based restorations and proper try-in, and examines options for conventional and adhesive luting procedures.
Journal Article•10.1007/S11803-005-0008-9•
Earthquake safety assessment of concrete arch and gravity dams

[...]

Gao Lin1, Zhiqiang Hu1•
Dalian University of Technology1
01 Dec 2005-Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors developed a modified four-parameter Hsieh-Ting-Chen viscoplastic consistency model to simulate the rate-dependent behavior of concrete.
Abstract: Based on research studies currently being carried out at Dalian University of Technology, some important aspects for the earthquake safety assessment of concrete dams are reviewed and discussed. First, the rate-dependent behavior of concrete subjected to earthquake loading is examined, emphasizing the properties of concrete under cyclic and biaxial loading conditions. Second, a modified four-parameter Hsieh-Ting-Chen viscoplastic consistency model is developed to simulate the rate-dependent behavior of concrete. The earthquake response of a 278m high arch dam is analyzed, and the results show that the strain-rate effects become noticeable in the inelastic range. Third, a more accurate non-smooth Newton algorithm for the solution of three-dimensional frictional contact problems is developed to study the joint opening effects of arch dams during strong earthquakes. Such effects on two nearly 300m high arch dams have been studied. It was found that the canyon shape has great influence on the magnitude and distribution of the joint opening along the dam axis. Fourth, the scaled boundary finite element method presented by Song and Wolf is employed to study the dam-reservoir-foundation interaction effects of concrete dams. Particular emphases were placed on the variation of foundation stiffness and the anisotropic behavior of the foundation material on the dynamic response of concrete dams. Finally, nonlinear modeling of concrete to study the damage evolution of concrete dams during strong earthquakes is discussed. An elastic-damage mechanics approach for damage prediction of concrete gravity dams is described as an example. These findings are helpful in understanding the dynamic behavior of concrete dams and promoting the improvement of seismic safety assessment methods.
Journal Article•10.1097/00005237-200504000-00003•
Partnerships with families: a foundation to support them in difficult times.

[...]

Jacqueline M. McGrath1•
Arizona State University1
01 Apr 2005-Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing
Proceedings Article•10.1061/40777(156)9•
Geogrid-Reinforced and Pile-Supported Roadway Embankment

[...]

Reinaldo Vega-Meyer, Yong Shao
9 Oct 2005
TL;DR: In this article, a case study of a roadway embankment supported by a geogrid-reinforced platform and precast concrete piles in Colon City, Republic of Panama is presented.
Abstract: Settlement is one of the major concerns in roadway embankment construction in areas where soft soil deposits constitute the major portion of subsurface soil. A pile foundation system is an effective way to support an embankment in order to minimize total settlement. In recent years, geosynthetic reinforcement has been successfully incorporated with pile foundations to improve settlement performance. Referred to as Load Transfer Platform (LTP), or Geosynthetic Reinforced Platform (GRP), the system combines vertical piles and horizontal geosynthetics to form a relatively stiff platform that transfers embankment load to a deeper, competent bearing layer. The geosynthetic layers serve as the tensioned platform that bridges over the piles and reduces the differential settlement at top of the platform, which in turn reduces the differential settlement of the embankment. After a brief discussion of the system mechanism, this paper focuses on a case study of a roadway embankment supported by a geogrid-reinforced platform and precast concrete piles in Colon City, Republic of Panama. The embankment, a MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) retaining wall with a maximum height of 3.2 meters, was built on a 1.0-meter thick geogrid reinforced crushed stone LTP, which is supported by 30 cm diameter precast piles. Piles penetrate through 6 meters of organic clay to a very dense sandy silt bearing layer, 10 meters below the existing ground surface. Due to the complexity of the system a numerical method was used to model the system and evaluate settlement behavior. This paper presents a detailed discussion of the project information, the design methodology and the numerical modeling. In addition, field instrumentation is also presented in comparison with the design and analysis.
Journal Article•10.1260/030952405776234571•
Concrete is the Future for Offshore Foundations

[...]

P. Vølund
01 Dec 2005-Wind Engineering
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare the costs of using concrete foundations against steel monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines, and argue that concrete foundations will be cheaper than steel monopiles.
Abstract: This paper compares the costs of using concrete foundations against steel monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines, and argues that concrete foundations will be cheaper. Most offshore windfarms have steel monopile foundations, but in Denmark concrete gravity foundations have been used with success. Two projects have tendered for steel monopiles and for concrete foundations and have implemented the concrete foundations that proved cheaper. No project has tendered for both foundation concepts and chosen steel monopiles.Nysted Offshore Windfarm with concrete foundations has the cheapest foundations of any offshore windfarm so far. A conceptual foundation study carried out for the London Array West Offshore Windfarm indicates that the same method and very low-cost foundations as for Nysted can be used. Optimised design of light-weight concrete constructions is the key to low-cost installation. Cheap manufacture can be carried out near the site or at even lower cost in Eastern Europa from where it can b...
Patent•
Concrete foundation wall with a low density core and carbon fiber and steel reinforcement

[...]

Harold G. Messenger, Thomas Rotondo
1 Apr 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, a fabricated concrete foundation wall is provided with a plurality of insulation panels and reinforcing ribs to improve strength and reduce the density of the wall panel, and the foundation wall panels are easily placed and interconnected together to quickly provide a foundation adapted to support the main walls of a home.
Abstract: A fabricated concrete foundation wall is provided with a plurality of insulation panels and reinforcing ribs to improve strength and reduce the density of the wall panel. The foundation wall panels are easily placed and interconnected together to quickly provide a foundation adapted to support the main walls of a home, for example. The foundation panels in one embodiment generally include a facewall that may have at least one carbon fiber band positioned horizontally therethrough to provide additional stiffness.
Book Chapter•10.1016/B978-0-7506-7878-0.50007-7•
Chapter 3 – Developing a Foundation for a Successful Knowledge Management System

[...]

Charles H. Bixler
1 Jan 2005
...

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve