About: Fluperlapine is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 63 publications have been published within this topic receiving 5695 citations. The topic is also known as: C10967 & fluoroperlapine.
TL;DR: It is proposed that since N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction can cause psychosis in humans and corticolimbic neurodegenerative changes in the rat brain, and since these changes are prevented by certain antipsychotic drugs, including atypical neuroleptic agents, a better understanding of this mechanism may lead to improved pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia.
Abstract: In this article, we advance a unified hypothesis pertaining to combined dysfunction of dopamine andN-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors that highlights N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction as a key mechanism that can help explain major clinical and pathophysiological aspects of schizophrenia. The following fundamental features of schizophrenia are accommodated by this hypothesis: (1) the occurrence of structural brain changes during early development that have the potential for producing subsequent clinical manifestations of schizophrenia, (2) a quiescent period in infancy and adolescence before clinical manifestations are expressed, (3) onset in early adulthood of psychotic symptoms, (4) involvement of dopamine (D2) receptors in some cases but not others that would explain why some but not all patients are responsive to typical neuroleptic therapy, and (5) ongoing neurodegenerative changes and cognitive deterioration in some patients. We propose that since N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction can cause psychosis in humans and corticolimbic neurodegenerative changes in the rat brain, and since these changes are prevented by certain antipsychotic drugs, including atypical neuroleptic agents (clozapine, olanzapine, fluperlapine), a better understanding of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction mechanism and ways of preventing its neurodegenerative consequences in the rat brain may lead to improved pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia.
TL;DR: All of the compounds examined elevated FLI in the nucleus accumbens and medial striatum, indicating that potential antipsychotic activity is predicted most consistently on this basis.
Abstract: Clozapine and haloperidol produce different induction patterns of c-fos expression in the forebrain, with haloperidol increasing Fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, lateral septal nucleus and clozapine producing such effects in the nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex and lateral septal nucleus. Accordingly, it was deemed possible that this approach may be useful in characterizing compounds with known or suggested antipsychotic actions. We therefore examined the effects of 17 compounds considered to be either typical, or atypical, antipsychotics on FLI in the prefrontal cortex, medial and dorsolateral striatum, nucleus accumbens and the lateral septal nucleus. Consistent with the hypothesis that the prefrontal cortex may be a target for some antipsychotic actions, FLI was elevated in this structure by clozapine, ICI 204,636, fluperlapine, RMI-81,582, remoxipride, molindone, melperone and tiospirone. Likewise, the ability of all of the compounds, except for risperidone, to enhance FLI in the lateral septal nucleus suggests that this limbic region also may be an important locus of antipsychotic action. All of the compounds examined elevated FLI in the nucleus accumbens and medial striatum, indicating that potential antipsychotic activity is predicted most consistently on this basis. Neuroleptics with a clearly documented liability for producing extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) such as chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, loxapine, metoclopramide and molindone elevated FLI in the dorsolateral striatum. In contrast, compounds unlikely to produce EPS such as clozapine, thioridazine, risperidone, remoxipride, fluperlapine, sulpiride, melperone and RMI-81,582 either failed to increase or produced minor elevations in FLI in the dorsolateral striatum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
TL;DR: Clozapine's unusual efficacy in refractory schizophrenic patients and its low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects may be explained, but because most other atypical neuroleptics studied lacked high affinity and selectivity at muscarinic receptor subtypes, it is likely that other mechanisms are involved as well.
Abstract: We determined the affinity and selectivity of binding for 24 compounds: nine antimuscarinics (including some antiparkinson drugs) and 15 neuroleptics (including the atypical compounds clozapine, fluperlapine, melperone, rilapine, risperidone, tenilapine, tiosperone and zotepine) at the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) were obtained from competitive radioligand binding studies with [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate and membranal preparations of these cells. As expected, QNB had the highest affinity of the compounds studied at the five receptor subtypes and was not selective (Kd ranged from 0.027-0.088 nM). Benztropine had the next highest affinity of the antimuscarinic compounds and thioridazine had the highest affinity of the neuroleptics. Among the antiparkinson drugs, biperiden was the only one selective for the m1 subtype; and among the neuroleptics, the atypical drug clozapine was also selective for the m1 subtype. This selectivity may explain clozapine's unusual efficacy in refractory schizophrenic patients and its low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects. However, because most other atypical neuroleptics studied lacked high affinity and selectivity at muscarinic receptor subtypes, it is likely that other mechanisms are involved as well.
TL;DR: The results indicate that although several putative atypical antipsychotic agents have high affinities for the cloned rat 5-HT1C receptor, the spectrum of drug binding does not correlate with the atypicals nature of these compounds.
Abstract: We determined the affinities of clozapine and 21 other typical and atypical antipsychotic agents for the cloned 5-hydroxytryptamine-1C (5-HT1C) receptor. For these studies, 5-HT1C receptors were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells using the vector pSVK3-5HT1C. We discovered that clozapine and several other putative typical and atypical antipsychotic agents (loxapine greater than tiosperone greater than SCH23390 greater than fluperlapine greater than rilapine greater than chlorpromazine) had relatively high affinities (7-30 nM) for the cloned 5-HT1C receptor. Other antipsychotic agents (risperidone greater than tenilapine greater than mesoridazine greater than thioridazine greater than cis-fluphenthixol) had intermediate affinities (30-100 nM), whereas many other antipsychotics (fluphenazine greater than spiperone greater than amperozide greater than melperone greater than thiothixene greater than haloperidol, metoclopramide, pimozide, domperidone, sulpiride) had low affinities (greater than 500 nM) for the cloned 5-HT1C receptor. The results indicate that although several putative atypical antipsychotic agents have high affinities for the cloned rat 5-HT1C receptor, the spectrum of drug binding does not correlate with the atypical nature of these compounds.
TL;DR: D4 dopamine receptor affinity, used as a single measure, does not distinguish between the group of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs analyzed.
Abstract: The affinities of 13 atypical and 12 typical antipsychotic drugs for the cloned rat D4 dopamine receptor and the D4/D2 ratios were examined. Of the atypical antipsychotic drugs tested, only clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, zotepine and tiospirone had affinities less than 20 nM. In fact, many atypical antipsychotic drugs had relatively low affinities for the cloned rat D4 receptor, with Ki values greater than 100 nM (Seroquel, fluperlapine, tenilapine, FG5803 and melperone). Additionally, several typical antipsychotic drugs had high affinities for the cloned rat D4 receptor, with Kis less than 20 nM (loxapine, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, mesoridazine, thioridazine and trifluoroperazine). The ratios of D2/D4 affinities did not differentiate between these two types of antipsychotic drugs. Thus, D4 dopamine receptor affinity, used as a single measure, does not distinguish between the group of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs analyzed.