About: Fluocinolone is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 182 publications have been published within this topic receiving 2972 citations. The topic is also known as: Fluocinolone.
TL;DR: The irreversible step in tumor promotion might be the result of an aberrant mitotic segregation event leading to the expression of carcinogen/mutagen-induced recessive genetic or epigenetic chromosomal changes.
Abstract: 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), a powerful tumor promoter, is shown to induce sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), whereas the nonpromoting derivative 4-O-methyl-TPA does not. Inhibitors of tumor promotion--antipain, leupeptin, and fluocinolone acetonide--inhibit formation of such TPA-induced SCEs. TPA is a unique agent in its induction of SCEs in the absence of DNA damage, chromosome aberrations, mutagenesis, or significant toxicity. Because TPA is known to induce several gene functions, we speculate that it might also induce enzymes involved in genetic recombination. Thus, the irreversible step in tumor promotion might be the result of an aberrant mitotic segregation event leading to the expression of carcinogen/mutagen-induced recessive genetic or epigenetic chromosomal changes.
TL;DR: A protocol to monitor IOP after IVT steroid injection/implantation is suggested that includes checking IOP within 30 minutes after injection, followed by 1 week after IVt triamcinolone and 2 weeks after implant insertion, then every 2 weeks for the first month and monthly for up to 6 months after IVCtriamcinlone and dexamethasone implantation.
TL;DR: The fluocinolone acetonide sustained drug delivery implant seems to be promising in patients with posterior uveitis who do not respond to or are intolerant to conventional treatment, and effectively controlled intraocular inflammation in the studied population.
TL;DR: F A is the most effective method to determine the presence (or absence) of macular cystoid edema, its extension, persistence, regression, or the degree of ischemia, and Fluorescein angiography (FA) remains essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of RVO.
Abstract: Retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) have been defined as retinal vascular disorders characterized by dilatation of the retinal veins with retinal and subretinal hemorrhages and macular edema, and/or retinal ischemia. Fluorescein angiography (FA) remains essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of RVO, allowing recognition of the diverse types of RVO, such as perfused or nonperfused, as well as detection of the different modalities in natural history. F A is the most effective method to determine the presence (or absence) of macular cystoid edema, its extension, persistence, regression, or the degree of ischemia. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) helps to quantify the changes in retinal thickness, the amount of cystoid macular edema, and supplies additional information, such as whether the accumulated fluid is located mostly within the retinal layers or additionally in the sub retinal space. SD-OCT can display the presence and integrity of the outer limiting membrane and of the inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors, useful information for prognosis and a guide for treatment in the management of RVO. Laser photocoagulation in a 'grid' pattern over the area, demonstrated as leaking by FA, remains the 'reference treatment for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion', according to the recent results of the SCORE Trial. Recent case series studies and prospective randomized trials strongly suggest an antiedematous effect of intravitreal steroids and an associated improvement in vision. These studies have suggested that intravitreal steroids (triamcinolone, fluocinolone, dexamethasone in a slow-release device) and intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, pegabtanib) may at least temporarily reduce foveal edema and correspondingly improve visual function. Surgical treatment modalities have been reported for RVOs. The positive action of vitrectomy seems durable; the combination of surgery and intravitreal injection of steroids and/or an injection of tissue plasminogen activator could permit a more rapid and lasting action. However, strong data from randomized trials are warranted.
TL;DR: New intraocular corticosteroid devices which are designed to deliver sustained-release drugs and obviate the need for systemic immunosuppressive treatment are developed.
Abstract: Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of the management of patients with uveitis. Topical corticosteroids are effective in the control of anterior uveitis, but vary in strength, ocular penetration and side effect profile. Systemic corticosteroids are widely used for the management of posterior segment inflammation which requires treatment, particularly when it is associated with systemic disease or when bilateral ocular disease is present. However, when ocular inflammation is unilateral, or is active in one eye only, local therapy has considerable advantages, and periocular injections of corticosteroid are a useful alternative to systemic medication and are very effective in controlling mild or moderate intraocular inflammation. More recently, the injection of intraocular corticosteroids such as triamcinolone have been found to be effective in reducing macular oedema and improving vision in uveitic eyes which have proved refractory to systemic or periocular corticosteroids. The effect is usually transient, lasting around 3 months, but can be repeated although the side effects of cataract and raised intraocular pressure are increased in frequency with intraocular versus periocular corticosteroid injections. This has led to the development of new intraocular corticosteroid devices which are designed to deliver sustained-release drugs and obviate the need for systemic immunosuppressive treatment. The first such implant was Retisert, which is surgically implanted (in the operating theatre) and is designed to release fluocinolone over a period of about 30 months. More recently, Ozurdex, a 'bioerodible' dexamethasone implant which can be inserted in an office setting, has completed phase III clinical trials in patients with intermediate and posterior uveitis. This implant lasts approximately 6 months, and has been found to be effective with a much better side effect profile than Retisert or intravitreal triamcinolone injection, at least for one injection.