About: Flathead sole is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 51 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1352 citations. The topic is also known as: Hippoglossoides elassodon.
TL;DR: In this paper, a retrospective analysis of the relationship of physical oceanography and biology and recruitment of three Eastern Bering Sea flatfish stocks: flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra), and arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias) for the period 1978-1996 was provided.
TL;DR: Results suggest that a complex suite of density-dependent and density-independent factors may determine the response of EBS flatfish spatial distributions to increasing temperatures.
Abstract: The general warming of the eastern Bering Sea (EBS) and the wide range of abundance exhibited by several eastern Bering Sea flatfish motivated an examination of how density-dependent and density-independent factors may influence the spatial distributions of EBS flatfish. In this study, EBS trawl survey data from 1982 to 2006 were used to examine how temporal changes in the distributions of six flatfish species groups [yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera), rock sole (Lepidopsetta sp.), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides sp.), Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus), arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes sp.), and Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)] are related to temporal changes in the location of the ‘cold pool’ (bottom water < 2� C), and how the area occupied by flatfish are related to the cold pool and population abundance. Rock sole and flathead sole distributions have generally moved northwest since 1982 and are significantly correlated with the movement of the cold pool, whereas arrowtooth flounder avoid the cold pool and their area occupied is inversely related to the size of the cold pool. The area occupied by arrowtooth flounder and rock sole are also significantly related to stock abundance. Multivariate statistical models indicate that the location of rock sole is more strongly related to stock abundance than to the cold pool, whereas the area occupied by arrowtooth flounder is more strongly related to the area of the cold pool rather than abundance. The temperatures occupied by several flatfish stocks indicate a substantial variability in suitable temperatures. These results suggest that a complex suite of density-dependent and density-independent factors may determine the response of EBS flatfish spatial distributions to increasing temperatures.
TL;DR: In this article, three transects in Kachemak Bay, Alaska, were sampled in September 1994, May and August 1995, and February, May, and August 1996.
TL;DR: Norcross et al. as mentioned in this paper used a categorical analysis regression tree (CART) model to predict the abundance of flatfish in the nursery habitats of Alaska's Alaska Peninsula.
Abstract: Because it is unrealistic to assess fishes in all locations, models are needed to characterize the nursery habitats of flatfish species. Descriptive habitat models of species presence and categorical analysis regression tree (CART) models of species abundance have been developed in previous studies. Based on collections around Kodiak Island, Alaska in 1991 and 1992, these models have been developed for: age-0 flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon); age-0 Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis); age-1 yellowfin sole (Pleuronectes asper); and age-0 rock sole (Pleuronectes bilineatus). In 1995, collections were made in bays along the Alaska Peninsula (an area never before sampled for juvenile flatfishes) and were compared with the previous models developed for Kodiak Island in 1991 and 1992. Very simple descriptive models for Kodiak Island ( Norcross et al., 1995 , Neth. J. Sea Res. 34: 161–175) accurately predicted the abundance along the Alaska Peninsula of flathead sole (78%), Pacific halibut (96%), yellowfin sole (75%) and rock sole (99%) in specific depth ranges and on specific substrate types. More complex CART models of species abundance ( Norcross et al., 1997 , Fish. Bull. (US) 95: 504–520) were more precise but not as accurate as the descriptive models because some parameters were not always available at the test locations. Flathead sole were found at temperatures ≤ 8.9°C on mud and mixed mud substrates in similar proportions in 1995 (66%) as in 1991–92 (71%). Similarly, Pacific halibut were ≤ 7.9 km inside bays and at depths ≤ 40 m in 93% of the sites of this study, compared with 89% previously. Seventy-five per cent of yellowfin sole were at depths ≤ 28 m on mixed substrates in both study periods. Rock sole were found on sand and muddy sand substrates at temperatures above 8.7°C in 52% of the sites in present and 69% of the sites in previous studies. This field test demonstrated that both descriptive and CART models were very useful at identifying juvenile habitat parameters, but are insufficient for areas not previously sampled. The resource-selection models verified the importance of a subset of parameters used in earlier models and provided a statistical means (78–87% correct) for prediction of fish distribution in similar areas of the eastern North Pacific.
TL;DR: In this paper, the physical characteristics found to be most important in determining distribution of juveniles for each species of pleuronectid flatfish were hypothesize the following relationships: Age-0 rock sole are found predominantly in water depths less than 50 m, on sand or mixed sand substrate outside of or within bays.