About: Finite difference method is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 21603 publications have been published within this topic receiving 468852 citations. The topic is also known as: Finite-difference methods & FDM.
TL;DR: In this paper, the finite difference methods of Godunov, Hyman, Lax and Wendroff (two-step), MacCormack, Rusanov, the upwind scheme, the hybrid scheme of Harten and Zwas, the antidiffusion method of Boris and Book, and Glimm's method, a random choice method, are discussed.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a method of characteristics used for numerical computation of solutions of fluid dynamical equations is characterized by a large degree of non standardness and therefore is not suitable for automatic computation on electronic computing machines, especially for problems with a large number of shock waves and contact discontinuities.
Abstract: The method of characteristics used for numerical computation of solutions of fluid dynamical equations is characterized by a large degree of non standardness and therefore is not suitable for automatic computation on electronic computing machines, especially for problems with a large number of shock waves and contact discontinuities. In 1950 v. Neumann and Richtmyer proposed to use, for the solution of fluid dynamics equations, difference equations into which viscosity was introduced artificially; this has the effect of smearing out the shock wave over several mesh points. Then, it was proposed to proceed with the computations across the shock waves in the ordinary manner. In 1954, Lax published the "triangle'' scheme suitable for computation across the shock" waves. A deficiency of this scheme is that it does not allow computation with arbitrarily fine time steps (as compared with the space steps divided by the sound speed) because it then transforms any initial data into linear functions. In addition, this scheme smears out contact discontinuities. The purpose of this paper is to choose a scheme which is in some sense best and which still allows computation across the shock waves. This choice is made for linear equations and then by analogy the scheme is applied to the general equations of fluid dynamics. Following this scheme we carried out a large number of computations on Soviet electronic computers. For a check, some of these computations were compared with the computations carried out by the method of characteristics. The agreement of results was fully satisfactory.
TL;DR: In this article, a set of radiation and outflow boundary conditions compatible with the DRP schemes is constructed, and a sequence of numerical simulations is conducted to test the effectiveness of the time-marching dispersion-relation-preserving (DRP) schemes.
TL;DR: This work presents an adaptive method based on the idea of multiple, component grids for the solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations using finite difference techniques based upon Richardson-type estimates of the truncation error, which is a mesh refinement algorithm in time and space.
Abstract: We present an adaptive method based on the idea of multiple, component grids for the solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations using finite difference techniques. Based upon Richardson-type estimates of the truncation error, refined grids are created or existing ones removed to attain a given accuracy for a minimum amount of work. Our approach is recursive in that fine grids can themselves contain even finer grids. The grids with finer mesh width in space also have a smaller mesh width in time, making this a mesh refinement algorithm in time and space. We present the algorithm, data structures and grid generation procedure, and conclude with numerical examples in one and two space dimensions.