Topic
Finite difference method
About: Finite difference method is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 21603 publications have been published within this topic receiving 468852 citations. The topic is also known as: Finite-difference methods & FDM.
Papers published on a yearly basis
1 / 2
Papers
TL;DR: In this article, a family of mass-lumped finite element schemes using edge elements was proposed, in particular linear elements that are equivalent to the standard Yee FDTD scheme, and cubic elements that have superior phase accuracy.
Abstract: Finite element and finite difference methods for approximating the Maxwell system propagate numerical waves with slightly incorrect velocities, and this results in phase error in the computed solution. Indeed this error limits the type of problem that can be solved, because phase error accumulates during the computation and eventually destroys the solution. Here we propose a family of mass-lumped finite element schemes using edge elements. We emphasize in particular linear elements that are equivalent to the standard Yee FDTD scheme, and cubic elements that have superior phase accuracy. We prove theorems that allow us to perform a dispersion analysis of the two common families of edge elements on rectilinear grids. A result of this analysis is to provide some justification for the choice of the particular family we use. We also provide a limited selection of numerical results that show the efficiency of our scheme. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 14: 63–88, 1998
102 citations
TL;DR: A Galerkin finite element method with quadratic interpolation is employed in solving Poisson's equation to yield the electric potential solution in this article, and a backward difference method is utilized to compute the space charge density from the continuity equation.
Abstract: An accurate and efficient numerical scheme is presented for calculating electrical conditions inside wire‐duct electrostatic precipitators. A Galerkin finite‐element method with quadratic interpolation is employed in solving Poisson’s equation to yield the electric potential solution. A backward difference method is utilized to compute the space‐charge density from the continuity equation. The two methods are iteratively applied until convergence criteria for electric potential and current density are met. Computed potential and electric field values show good agreement with analytic solutions and experimental measurements. Comparisons between the present scheme and a finite‐difference scheme show that the finite‐element method offers distinct advantages in predicting the electrical characteristics of precipitators.
102 citations
1 Jan 1980
TL;DR: The Split Coefficient Matrix (SCM) finite difference method for solving hyperbolic systems of equations is presented in this paper, which is a new method based on the mathematical theory of characteristics.
Abstract: The Split Coefficient Matrix (SCM) finite difference method for solving hyperbolic systems of equations is presented. This new method is based on the mathematical theory of characteristics. The development of the method from characteristic theory is presented. Boundary point calculation procedures consistent with the SCM method used at interior points are explained. The split coefficient matrices that define the method for steady supersonic and unsteady inviscid flows are given for several examples. The SCM method is used to compute several flow fields to demonstrate its accuracy and versatility. The similarities and differences between the SCM method and the lambda-scheme are discussed.
102 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the Hilbert uniqueness method was used to solve the exact and approximate boundary controllability problems for the adjoint heat equation using convex duality, and a combination of finite difference methods for the time discretization, finite element methods for space discretisation, and of conjugate gradient and operator splitting methods for iterative solution of discrete control problems.
Abstract: The present article is concerned with the numerical implementation of the Hilbert uniqueness method for solving exact and approximate boundary controllability problems for the heat equation. Using convex duality, we reduce the solution of the boundary control problems to the solution of identification problems for the initial data of an adjoint heat equation. To solve these identification problems, we use a combination of finite difference methods for the time discretization, finite element methods for the space discretization, and of conjugate gradient and operator splitting methods for the iterative solution of the discrete control problems. We apply then the above methodology to the solution of exact and approximate boundary controllability test problems in two space dimensions. The numerical results validate the methods discussed in this article and clearly show the computational advantage of using second-order accurate time discretization methods to approximate the control problems.
102 citations
TL;DR: The individua band profiles obtained for binary mixtures are more accurate than those derived using one of several possible finite difference methods, and the advantage of the better accuracy is compensated by a considerably higher computation time.
102 citations
Related Topics (5)
Performance Metrics
| Year | Papers |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 53 |
| 2024 | 136 |
| 2023 | 170 |
| 2022 | 357 |
| 2021 | 733 |
| 2020 | 690 |