TL;DR: Groups of adult male field crickets caged in small arenas form essentially linear dominance hierarchies which are stable for short periods of time and can be described in terms of several characteristics.
Abstract: Most contacts between adult male field crickets involve aggressive behavior by one or both individuals and terminate with the obvious retreat of one individual. Aggressive behavior consists of one or more of several actions: in mild encounters there is either rearing of the forebody, lashing of the antennae, and shaking of the body, or else rearing of the hind body, kicking with the hind legs, and shaking of the body; in intense encounters, antennal lashing and rearing of the forebody are followed by spreading the mandibles, stridulating distinctively, rushing forward, sparring with the forelegs, butting with the head, and grappling, wrestling, or biting with the mandibles. A male is often flipped back or thrown sideways, but mutilation as a result of fighting is rare, and only in the most intense encounters is the winner determined by what seems to be superior strength or fighting ability. The outcomes of most encounters are determined by the relative tenacity of the two males, and the intensity of aggression exhibited is correlated with the length of the fight, continued aggressive activity developing into increasingly severe combat until one male finally retreats. Groups of adult male field crickets caged in small arenas form essentially linear dominance hierarchies which are stable for short periods of time and which can be described in terms of several characteristics: (1) each male dominates all or nearly all of his encounters with males below him in the hierarchy, (2) the total number of encounters by individual males decreases gradually toward the bottom of the hierarchy, (3) the intensity of aggression exhibited during encounters decreases more or less gradually toward the bottom of the hierarchy and the numbers of no-decision and no-aggression encounters and actively homosexual contacts increase, and (4) encounters between males which rank next to each other are usually more intense than encounters between males which are far apart in the hierarchy.
TL;DR: This study shows that multiple mating is a potential mechanism of mate choice and a function of multiple mating may be to dilute the sperm stored from previous matings with that of the current male, so increasing his representation in offspring production.
TL;DR: Octopamine has been called the 'fight or flight' hormone of insects as discussed by the authors and has been shown to be released as a neurohormone to prepare the animal for a period of extended activity or to assist the animal in recovering from an increased energy demand.
Abstract: Octopamine has been called the 'fight or flight' hormone of insects. We tested this hypothesis by measuring octopamine levels in the haemolymph of field crickets after fighting, flying, courting and escape behaviours. Octopamine levels in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus increased during aggressive (agonistic) behaviour from baseline levels of 4.5 +/- 2.1 pg microliters-1 haemolymph to 24.3 +/- 15.2 pg microliters-1 haemolymph, regardless of whether the cricket won or lost the encounter. Octopamine levels also increased after 5 min of flying (to 44.6 +/- 22.3 pg microliters-1) and during courtship. However, crickets did not exhibit an increase in their haemolymph octopamine levels after performing an escape run. Therefore, neurohormonal octopamine shows some, but not all, of the characteristics that would be expected if it were a component of a nonspecific 'arousal' system. Rather, octopamine may be released as a neurohormone to prepare the animal for a period of extended activity or to assist the animal in recovering from a period of increased energy demand. Antennal contact with conspecifics may provide a sensory cue that results in the release of octopamine into the haemolymph.
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of population density on the nature of encounters between males, and factors affecting individual competitive ability were examined in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.
TL;DR: A geographic trend of size variation and its adaptive background is described, one of the most variable and easily discernible external characters among the local populations of this field cricket, and yet the broad tendency of this geographic variation has remained to be investigated.
Abstract: This article describes a geographic trend of size variation and its adaptive background. The Emma field cricket, Teleogryllus emma (Ohmachi et Matsuura) is one of the most conspicuous and widely distributed insects between 30 and 440 north latitude in the Japanese islands. This species produces only one generation a year. The nymph hatches in late spring or early summer and matures in autumn. The adult lays diapause eggs in the soil. This pattern of the life cycle is stable throughout the islands, posing a question about geographic adaptation. A conspicuous climatic gradient exists within the range of this species. The annual mean temperature is about 7 C in the northernmost habitat of Hokkaido, while it reaches as high as 19 C in the island of Tanegasima near the southern limit of distribution. Under such circumstances, local adjustments of development are required for stabilizing the univoltine cycle. Otherwise, the life cycle would tend to depart from the established pattern in different climates. A physiological cline has been found in the intensity of egg diapause of this cricket, which is closely correlated with the local climatic conditions (Masaki, 1965). The nymphs of a northern strain give rise to smaller adults after a shorter period of development than do the nymphs of a southern strain, and intercrossing between them produces hybrids of intermediate size (Masaki, 1963). Body size is one of the most variable and easily discernible external characters among the local populations of this field cricket, and yet the broad tendency of this geographic variation has remained to be investigated. Variation in size frequently occurs in many other insects and has been the concern of entomologists in the past. Previously, geographic regularities of such variations have been reported for several species (for example, Dobzhansky, 1951; Huxley, 1963). Nevertheless, the difficulty in determining their adaptive significance is particularly acute (Mayr, 1963), and no principle comparable to Bergmann's rule for warm-blooded animals has been established for insects. This is probably due to the difficulty in distinguishing between environmental and genetic variations of field material. Without this distinction, the real adaptive significance of size trends cannot be recognized and factors of natural selection cannot be inferred with certainty. The close examination of field specimens and the experimental study of local populations in the laboratory seem, in most cases, indispensable for elucidating the genetic and adaptive background of size trends. In the following account such an analysis is attempted.