About: Ficus is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1423 publications have been published within this topic receiving 18785 citations. The topic is also known as: the fig genus.
TL;DR: The Wiebes’ chapter in this volume is the most recent review of the details of the interaction of fig wasps with figs, and stresses interactions among many parts of the system.
Abstract: The 900-odd species of Ficus (20, 21) constitute the most distinctive of the widespread genera of tropical plants. Figs have (a) a complex obligatory mutualism with their pollinating agaonid fig wasps, yet are found in almost all tropical habitat types and geographic locations [this sets them apart from ant-acacias (63-65), euglossine-orchids (24,26), moth-yuccas (45, 88, 89,), ant-epiphytes (66, 98) and ant-fungi (109)]; (b) fruits eaten by a large variety of vertebrates, most of which appear to be fig seed dispersers rather than seed predators; (c) minute seeds despite the adults’ long-lived woody life form; (d) exceptionally numerous congeners in almost any mainland tropical forest habitat; (e) every woody life-form (deciduous, evergreen; tree, strangler, epiphyte, vine, scandent shrub, bush); (f) intra-population inter-tree asynchronous flowering and fruiting in many habitats, yet strong intra-tree synchronous flowering and fruiting; (g) heavy outcrossed pollination even when the density of flowering conspecifics is extremely low; (h) no inter-specific competition for pollinators within a habitat irrespective of the number of Ficus species present and the timing of sexual reproduction; (i) heavy visitation of fruiting crowns by seed dispersers even when the density of conspecifics is extremely low; and (j) over 50% predispersal seed predation of all seed crops. There is a voluminous literature on the taxonomy and biology of fig flowers, fig fruits, and fig wasps (see reviews in 1, 9, 16, 20-22, 34-36, 41, 47, 52, 86, 90-96, 101, 112, 113), but each author focused on particular aspects of the system. Here I stress interactions among many parts of the system. Wiebes’ chapter in this volume is the most recent review of the details of the interaction of fig wasps with figs. However, a very brief overview of fig biology is useful here. First, ignore the atypical commercial fig, Ficus carica, since it occupies extra-tropical to sub-tropical habitats, has decidu-
TL;DR: The consumption of figs by vertebrates is reviewed using data from the literature, unpublished accounts and new field data from Borneo and Hong Kong, supporting previous claims that Ficus is the most important plant genus for tropical frugivores.
Abstract: The consumption of figs (the fruit of Ficus spp.; Moraceae) by vertebrates is reviewed using data from the literature, unpublished accounts and new field data from Borneo and Hong Kong. Records of frugivory from over 75 countries are presented for 260 Ficus species (approximately 30% of described species). Explanations are presented for geographical and taxonomic gaps in the otherwise extensive literature. In addition to a small number of reptiles and fishes, 1274 bird and mammal species in 523 genera and 92 families are known to eat figs. In terms of the number of species and genera of fig-eaters and the number of fig species eaten we identify the avian families interacting most with Ficus to be Columbidae, Psittacidae, Pycnonotidae, Bucerotidae, Sturnidae and Lybiidae. Among mammals, the major fig-eating families are Pteropodidae, Cercopithecidae, Sciuridae, Phyllostomidae and Cebidae. We assess the role these and other frugivores play in Ficus seed dispersal and identify fig-specialists. In most, but not all, cases fig specialists provide effective seed dispersal services to the Ficus species on which they feed. The diversity of fig-eaters is explained with respect to fig design and nutrient content, phenology of fig ripening and the diversity of fig presentation. Whilst at a gross level there exists considerable overlap between birds, arboreal mammals and fruit bats with regard to the fig species they consume, closer analysis, based on evidence from across the tropics, suggests that discrete guilds of Ficus species differentially attract subsets of sympatric frugivore communities. This dispersal guild structure is determined by interspecific differences in fig design and presentation. Throughout our examination of the fig-frugivore interaction we consider phylogenetic factors and make comparisons between large-scale biogeographical regions. Our dataset supports previous claims that Ficus is the most important plant genus for tropical frugivores. We explore the concept of figs as keystone resources and suggest criteria for future investigations of their dietary importance. Finally, fully referenced lists of frugivores recorded at each Ficus species and of Ficus species in the diet of each frugivore are presented as online appendices. In situations where ecological information is incomplete or its retrieval is impractical, this valuable resource will assist conservationists in evaluating the role of figs or their frugivores in tropical forest sites.
TL;DR: The free radical scavenging activity of different fractions obtained from successive fractionation of the six methanol extracts with organic solvents of different polarities; petroleum ether, CHCl 3, EtOAc and n-BuOH; showed that, the EtO Ac and n -BuOH fractions have the high activity with SC 50− 3 fractions have weak activity at SC 50 ≥ 200 and 100μg/ml, respectively as discussed by the authors.
TL;DR: Large numbers of Ficus species are able to coexist because many are extremely rare as a result of limited recruitment opportunities, which limits competition, and they are nevertheless able to breed at low densities because they possess an efficient, long-range pollination system.
Abstract: Ficus (Moraceae) is arguably one of the most important plant genera in lowland tropical rainforests. A brief review of tropical florulas also demonstrates that Ficus is the only ubiquitously diverse genus in lowland rainforests. Monoecious hemiepiphytic figs, constituting independent radiations in each tropical biome, make up a significant proportion of species everywhere, but in Asia dioecious figs have diversified into a variety of niches, making the assemblages of this region especially speciose. Pioneer attributes have endowed figs with tremendous evolutionary flexibility, while long-range seed dispersal ensures that a high proportion of the regional species pool is represented in local assemblages. Large numbers of Ficus species are able to coexist because many are extremely rare as a result of limited recruitment opportunities, which limits competition. They are nevertheless able to breed at low densities because they possess an efficient, long-range pollination system. These factors are li...
TL;DR: The associations of pollinating fig wasps were congruent with host fig phylogeny and further supported a revised classification of Ficus and suggested that functionally dioecious figs are not monophyletic and that monoecious subg.
Abstract: Figs (Ficus, Moraceae) are either monoecious or gynodioecious depending on the arrangement of unisexual florets within the specialized inflorescence or syconium. The gynodioecious species are functionally dioecious due to the impact of pollinating fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae) on the maturation of fig seeds. The evolutionary relationships of functionally dioecious figs (Ficus subg. Ficus) were examined through phylogenetic analyses based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA and morphology. Forty-six species representing each monoecious subgenus and each section of functionally dioecious subg. Ficus were included in parsimony analyses based on 180 molecular characters and 61 morphological characters that were potentially informative. Separate and combined analyses of molecular and morphological data sets suggested that functionally dioecious figs are not monophyletic and that monoecious subg. Sycomorus is derived within a dioecious clade. The combined analysis indicated one or two origins of functional dioecy in the genus and at least two reversals to monoecy within a functionally dioecious lineage. The exclusion of breeding system and related characters from the analysis also indicated two shifts from monoecy to functional dioecy and two reversals. The associations of pollinating fig wasps were congruent with host fig phylogeny and further supported a revised classification of Ficus.