Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Faculty development
  4. 2025
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Faculty development
  4. 2025
Showing papers on "Faculty development published in 2025"
Journal Article•10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328364•
WIP: Designing Faculty Mentorship at Scale: Lessons from the Mentorship 360 Faculty Mentoring Program at Arizona State University

[...]

Jennifer Bekki, Samantha Brunhaver, Ann McKenna
2 Nov 2025
TL;DR: This WIP paper describes the Mentorship 360 program, a multi-level faculty mentoring initiative at Arizona State University, integrating localized mentorship, coaching, and professional development to address diverse faculty needs and promote academic success, retention, and wellbeing.
Abstract: This innovative practice WIP paper describes the Mentorship 360 (M360) Faculty Mentoring Program, a multi-level initiative implemented within the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Faculty mentorship is a critical yet often under-resourced element of academic success and retention, especially within large, interdisciplinary engineering colleges. Designed to address the diverse needs of faculty across career stages and appointment types, M360 integrates localized school-based mentorship, individualized coaching, cross-unit collaboration through a community of practice, and values-driven professional development workshops. The program aligns with best practices in formal mentoring, emphasizing intentional mentor-mentee matching, institutional support, and inclusive design. We describe the program's structure, implementation across multiple academic units, key lessons learned, and strategies for sustaining engagement and impact. Findings highlight both the promise and challenges of embedding mentorship into faculty culture at scale, offering insights for institutions seeking to foster faculty development, wellbeing, and belonging through systemic mentorship.
Journal Article•10.1080/19415257.2025.2472186•
Teachers’ professional development within art experiences: Pedagogical narratives for hopeful educational futures

[...]

André Freitas, Fátima Pereira, Paulo Nogueira
26 Feb 2025-Journal of In-service Education
Journal Article•10.1080/13664530.2025.2496441•
A teacher professional development program for online learning in times of crisis

[...]

Noa Shapira, Meital Amzalag
02 May 2025-Teacher Development
TL;DR: This study develops an Online Learning in Times of Crisis (OLTC) model for teacher professional development, incorporating modeling, peer collaboration, and emotional support to enhance teachers' capabilities and address stress, anxiety, and isolation during crises.
Abstract: ABSTRACT In response to the unforeseen challenges posed by the COVID-19 crisis, this study explores the abrupt transition to online teaching and the subsequent need for an effective Online Learning in Times of Crisis (OLTC) model. Drawing on a comprehensive framework for Teacher Professional Development (TPD) geared towards Online and Blended Learning, the findings contribute to the development of a model adaptable to the diverse needs of teachers across various disciplines and age groups. Modifications to the framework advocate for the incorporation of modeling, peer collaboration, and strategies to address educators’ emotions, such as managing stress, reducing anxiety, and combating feelings of isolation, during crises. The results highlight the positive impact of the TPD for OLTC model, improving teachers’ capabilities and providing valuable support during challenging times. This model may serve as a model for online TPD programs during future challenges and when faced with unexpected events.
Journal Article•10.3928/01484834-20240923-01•
Faculty Development Needs in Southeastern Conference Nursing Schools

[...]

Victoria Niederhauser, Demetrius J. Porche, Suzanne S. Prevost, Julie Sanford, Lori Popjoy, Arindam Sarkar, Jeanette S. Andrews 
01 Jan 2025-Journal of Nursing Education
TL;DR: This study examines faculty development needs in Southeastern Conference nursing schools, identifying differences in interests based on years in academia, tenure status, faculty rank, and work setting, highlighting the importance of investing in faculty development for excellent academic nursing education.
Abstract: Background This study examined nurse faculty members' teaching, scholarship, and professional development interests across Southeastern Conference (SEC) nursing schools, and evaluated differences in these needs associated with years in academia, tenure status, faculty rank, and Accountable Health Communities (AHC) versus non-AHC settings. Method Rosenthal and Stanberry's framework for faculty development provided the theoretical foundation for this cross-sectional study to explore topics of interests of faculty at 12 SEC nursing schools. Results A total of 470 faculty responded to the online survey (57% response rate). Top interests in the categories of teaching, scholarship and research, and professional development items are discussed. There were significant differences in interests in all three categories and in rank, years in academia, tenure status, and place of employment. Conclusion To ensure the delivery of excellent academic nursing education, academic nursing leaders must promote and invest in faculty development as a critical nursing professional development action. [ J Nurs Educ . 2025;64(1):7–14.]
Journal Article•10.1007/s11528-025-01123-8•
Generative AI for Teachers’ Self-Directed Professional Development: A Mixed-Methods Study

[...]

Zixi Li, Chaoran Wang, Curtis J. Bonk
25 Jul 2025-Techtrends
Journal Article•10.1080/13664530.2025.2511739•
Developing an adaptive professional learning model: educator insights on their infrastructure needs

[...]

Suzanne Myers, Jocelyn Washburn, Amber Rowland, Sean J. Smith
31 May 2025-Teacher Development
TL;DR: Researchers developed a technology-based tool to support school teams launching new initiatives, exploring its feasibility and educators' experiences with a simulated writing instruction implementation, highlighting intersections of professional development, coaching, and instructional practices.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Each year, teachers are introduced to new initiatives and innovations, which can be overwhelming, especially when support mechanisms are not thoughtfully planned and implemented. This article explores a new technology-based tool to support school teams launching new initiatives. The study focused on a progress monitoring tool to inform writing instruction. Researchers aimed to determine tool feasibility and learn about participants’ experiences with their school’s readiness for a new writing initiative. Two teams of six to eight educators at two Midwest US middle schools participated in simulated implementation team meetings. Simulation-based research was the investigative methodology, and meeting transcripts were analyzed using deductive coding and thematic analysis with modified constant comparison procedures. Other sources of data were surveys and an observation protocol. Findings explore intersections of professional development, instructional coaching, and instructional practices, and each system’s resources, personnel, and processes for implementation. Implications for future tool research and applications are discussed.
Journal Article•10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100790•
Addressing gaps in IPE faculty development: The Affiliate Faculty & Ambassador Program as a successful, scalable strategy

[...]

Alexandra Zagoloff, Bonnie Horgos, Sara North
22 Nov 2025-Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice
Journal Article•10.1177/23328584251338817•
An Exploration of Teacher Sense-Making Around Whiteness During a Critical Professional Development Course

[...]

Jami Carmichael, Carlos R. Casanova, Justine Parnell, Jordan King, Molly Cashion, Richard V. McGehee 
01 May 2025-AERA Open
TL;DR: This study explores P-12 educators' understanding of whiteness during a critical professional development course, revealing complexities in their awareness of systemic racism and challenges in explicitly naming whiteness, highlighting the need for sustained CPD to support anti-racist practices.
Abstract: There is a dearth in research on how practicing teachers understand and grapple with whiteness during critical professional development (CPD). To address this, we explored P-12 educators’ sense-making around whiteness as they learned about the theories that underpin Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) during CPD. Utilizing a critical whiteness studies lens, we found that educators recognized the connection between systemic racism and student harm, and both named and avoided naming whiteness as they navigated its influence. Our findings highlight the complexities of how educators engage with whiteness during CPD, revealing both an awareness of systemic racism and its consequences and the challenge of explicitly naming whiteness. We underscore the need for CPD to help educators interrogate and name whiteness, without centering it, and to build teacher capacity to support students of Color. Future research should explore how CPD can sustain these efforts and support educators in developing actionable anti-racist practices.
Journal Article•10.1007/s10763-025-10601-7•
From Conception to Practice: Junior High School Science Teachers’ Changes in the Conceptual Change Professional Development

[...]

Nuo Li, Zhenyan Liu, Enshan Liu
12 Aug 2025-International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Journal Article•10.1186/s41077-025-00399-3•
Building collaborative prescribers: development and analysis of a novel simulation-based role exchange education programme between pharmacy and medical students

[...]

Niall O’Boyle, Peter Currie, R. O'Hare, Richard McCrory, Niall Edwin Leonard, Stephen Kirk 
23 Dec 2025-Advances in simulation
TL;DR: A novel simulation-based role exchange education programme between pharmacy and medical students improved interprofessional collaboration, skills in history taking and prescribing, and professional identity formation, with 96% of students believing they could apply the skills in future practice.
Abstract: Undergraduate curricula across a number of healthcare professions have increased their focus on interprofessional education. From 2026 all pharmacy graduates in the UK will be independent prescribers, which will require them to develop skills of patient history taking and clinical assessment. Likewise, medical graduates will face increasingly complex prescribing challenges in an aging population with chronic illnesses, polypharmacy and personalised medicine. Developing these skills via collaborative practice is essential to meet the healthcare challenges of the future. We developed a novel interprofessional educational programme focused on medical admissions for final year medical and pharmacy students in a teaching hospital between January and March 2025. We utilised the concept of role exchange in simulation to foster development of mutual skills as well as enhanced professional identity formation and unique role recognition. We researched participant’s ability to work collaboratively, their skill development and their perceptions of IPL using a mixed methods approach. Pre and post course questionnaires using the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) self-assessment tool were completed by participants in addition to questions on skill acquisition and free text questions regarding their experiences of the programme. Statistical analysis using independent t-testing was performed and a summary of narrative data was used to analyse the qualitative data. The cohort size was 59 students (25 medical and 34 pharmacy). The pre-course response rate was 92% (n = 23) for medicine and 88% (n = 30) for pharmacy and the post course response rate was 88% (n = 22) for medicines and 91% (n = 31) for pharmacy. A total of 106 responses were analysed. A significant improvement was observed across: Interprofessional Values, Interprofessional Interactions and total score. Review of student comments identified several benefits and areas for future development. Students rated the course highly and 96% (n = 51) believed that they would be able to use the skills and knowledge gained in their future practice. Authentic simulated scenarios designed to align with professional practice, facilitated by role exchange, improves interprofessional collaboration and mutually develops skills in history taking and prescribing. This programme supports new standards for education in both medicine and pharmacy but delivery remains challenging due to its resource-intensive nature.
Journal Article•10.1080/19415257.2025.2480777•
Complex understanding of teachers’ professional development and learning in specific, concrete learning situations - new methodological options

[...]

Nóra Rapos, Katalin Tókos, Fruzsina Eszes, Krisztina Nagy, Dóra Czirfusz 
25 Mar 2025-Journal of In-service Education
Journal Article•10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101019•
Promoting inclusive practices with emerging technologies in higher education: Faculty professional development through blended-learning

[...]

Anabel Moriña, Víctor Hugo Perera Rodríguez
01 May 2025-Internet and Higher Education
Journal Article•10.12688/mep.21403.1•
Applied insights for using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Faculty Development in Health Professions Education

[...]

Melchor Sánchez Mendiola, Megan Anakin, Ardi Findyartini, Rachel Levine, Ana da Silva, Farhan Vakani 
08 Dec 2025-MedEdPublish
TL;DR: This article explores the application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Faculty Development for Health Professions Education, highlighting its potential to enhance quality, inclusivity, and standards through co-design, innovative formats, and equity-driven practices.
Abstract: By considering these insights, faculty developers can harness GenAI to co-design educational materials, extend their reach through innovative formats, and maintain ethical and equity-driven educational practices. This article highlights the transformative potential of GenAI in FD when thoughtfully integrated. GenAI can empower faculty developers to enhance the quality and inclusivity of HPE while safeguarding educational standards.
Journal Article•10.1007/s40670-025-02422-8•
What Keeps Faculty Coming Back? Factors Associated with Continued Pursuit of Faculty Development

[...]

David A Lindholm, Jessica T. Servey, Rhiana D. Saunders, Thomas McFate, S A Sidoti, Diego Borges Cordeiro, Dana M Blyth, Diane F. Hale, Gayle Haischer‐Rollo 
21 Jun 2025-Medical science educator
TL;DR: This study examines factors influencing clinician-educators to pursue faculty development, finding demographic and workshop factors, such as instructor type and hospital location, significantly impact attendance and return rates among physician faculty.
Abstract: Abstract Introduction Faculty development benefits clinician-educators, yet little is known about what influences clinical faculty to pursue development as educators. To optimize faculty development attendance at a federal medical school with geographically dispersed teaching hospitals, we assessed how demographic and workshop factors impacted attendance by comparing physician faculty who attended faculty development on a single day with those returning any future day. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of our faculty development website database for attendee, instructor, and workshop factors among physicians attending their first workshop in 2014–2022. We employed a multivariate model to determine a relative return ratio (RRR) and evaluate independent factors for return. Results Of 3,213 attendees, 2,204 (68.6%) returned on any future day, with 966/2,204 (43.8%) returning within one week. Surgical faculty were 11% less likely to return than medical faculty (RRR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.95), an effect heightened when both attendee and first instructor were surgeons. Workshops delivered by community-based instructors demonstrated decreased return compared to those delivered by university-based instructors (RRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99). Attendees whose first workshop occurred at large teaching hospitals with an instructor traveling from main campus were more likely to return than in other contexts. Day, month, and time of workshops also correlated with return. Discussion Our study suggests that demographic and workshop factors can influence clinician-educators to continue attending faculty development. We encourage faculty development leaders to evaluate attendance patterns vis-à-viz van Bruggen’s 4Cs of competence, context, community, and career to meet the dynamic needs of their faculty.
Journal Article•10.1128/jmbe.00215-24•
Faculty perceptions of a professional development program for developing CUREs and promoting inclusive and equitable teaching

[...]

Laura Gough, Rommel J. Miranda, Matthew R. Hemm, Leann L. Norman, Brian Jara 
13 Jan 2025-Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
TL;DR: This qualitative study explores 11 biology faculty members' perceptions of a professional development program that helped them create CUREs, promoting inclusive and equitable teaching practices, and found faculty were motivated to teach CUREs for various reasons, including integrating research and fostering inclusivity.
Abstract: ABSTRACT The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) model can be used to explore how faculty prioritize learning about and adopting new pedagogical approaches. Here, we use the DOI framework to contextualize biology faculty perceptions of a professional development (PD) program designed to help them create a full semester course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) class at a large, public comprehensive university. PD sessions included exploring self-reflexive identity while fostering inclusive classroom spaces through understanding and interrupting implicit bias and microaggressions. This qualitative study sought to determine 11 biology faculty members’ beliefs about the influence of their year-long PD on their CURE development and teaching practices. Findings suggest that faculty were motivated to teach CUREs for a variety of reasons. A common incentive was integrating research into a CURE to bring their passion into their classroom and to engage more students in research. This may be particularly important at institutions where faculty have a heavy teaching load. Faculty also reported modifying their teaching in their CUREs and other courses to be more inclusive and equitable. The importance of peer interactions in the PD was emphasized repeatedly as faculty learned from experts, the literature, and faculty who had already developed a CURE. Our results illustrate that a community of practice structure can enhance the learning aspect of the community, helping faculty consider their implementation of inclusive, equitable, and high-impact practices as an ongoing educational process for themselves and emphasizing the importance of reflection and iteration in a DOI framework.
Journal Article•10.1080/87567555.2025.2485128•
Faculty and Student Views on Specifications Grading Following a College-Wide Faculty Development Program

[...]

Carole L. Yue
29 Mar 2025-College Teaching
Journal Article•10.1007/s10639-025-13432-9•
Effects of technology-mediated professional development on special education teacher collective efficacy

[...]

Shantanu Tilak, Mindy Gumpert, Taryn A. Myers
27 Feb 2025-Education and Information Technologies
Journal Article•10.1152/advan.00118.2025•
Research Training in Physiology Course: Students’ Perspective for Outcomes, Gaps, and Solutions

[...]

Puja Dulloo, Steffy Amit, Neeraj Vedi
04 Sep 2025-Advances in Physiology Education
TL;DR: This study investigates first-year medical students' experiences with research training in physiology, identifying learning outcomes, challenges, and solutions, and concludes that early integration of research training improves research competencies and team-building skills with institutional support.
Abstract: The Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) curriculum, launched in 2019 by the National Medical Commission (NMC), India, emphasises the early integration of research training in undergraduate medical education to foster critical thinking, lifelong learning, and evidence-based practice. Despite this intent, systematic and structured research training for first-year medical students remains limited in implementation. This study investigated the perceived learning outcomes, challenges, and potential solutions experienced by first-year undergraduate medical students in the physiology department, who participated in a research activity aligned with the CBME framework. A cross-sectional, observational, qualitative study was conducted among undergraduate medical students in their first year of the 2023–2024 academic year. Following a sensitisation session on research methodology, students engaged in a group research activity. One hundred twenty-three students voluntarily submitted written feedback in response to three open-ended questions about their learning experiences, identified gaps, and suggested improvements. Two coders independently performed a thematic analysis of the reactions, with themes and categories finalised collaboratively. The analysis identified four central themes that reflected the learning outcomes: development of teamwork skills, improvement of research and problem-solving skills, personal development and flexibility, and intellectual and academic growth. Students gained an understanding of research methods and teamwork; challenges included formulating questions and managing time effectively. Solutions involved stronger mentorship, more precise guidance, and better group coordination. In conclusion, integrating early research training into the medical curriculum from the first year of the medical program improved students' research competencies and team-building skills. Institutional support and structured mentorship can further optimise these learning experiences.
Journal Article•10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328525•
Computer Science Literacy Atlas: Unpacking the Computer Science Education Standards Across Grade Levels

[...]

Sumi Hagiwara, Katherine G. Herbert, Minsun Shin
2 Nov 2025
TL;DR: This paper introduces the Computer Science Literacy Atlas, a resource for elementary teachers to integrate computer science into curricula, unpacking New Jersey State Student Learning Standards in Computer Science through a cross-disciplinary collaboration and participatory action research.
Abstract: This innovative practice paper introduces the Computer Science Literacy Atlas (CSLA), a resource for teachers to integrate computer science (CS) into curricula for scaffolded and developmentally appropriate instruction. Designed with elementary (grades K-6) teachers in mind, the CSLA serves as a tool for novice CS teachers to unpack the New Jersey State Student Learning Standards in Computer Science (NJSLS-CS). Developed through a state-funded grant, the Computer Science Project (CSP) is a cross-disciplinary collaboration between university faculty in CS and education and 19 K-12 teachers participating in a Professional Learning Community (PLC) at a major university in New Jersey. The collaborators engaged in participatory action research to respond to a need: resources to support teachers in integrating grade-appropriate CS knowledge and skills into their curriculum. The CSLA is a visual framework outlining the progression of students' concepts and skills toward CS literacy over time. A key focus of this work is to encourage educators to consider CS learning progressions over time and the relationships among CS concepts across grade levels. In particular, recognizing that pre-requisite skills are essential when applying state-level standards and scaffolding knowledge through multiple pathways.
Journal Article•10.1002/tesj.70005•
Multilingual Voices: Transforming Professional Development Based on Student Perceptions of Literacy Learning

[...]

Nicole Ferguson‐Sams, Emily L. Howell, Rebecca Kaminski, Mihaela Gazioglu, Victoria Pennington 
28 Jan 2025-TESOL Journal
TL;DR: This study explores multilingual learners' perceptions of literacy learning to inform professional development for teachers, using grounded theory coding and design-based research to create actionable implications for curriculum and instructional design to meet diverse learners' needs.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Acknowledging student perceptions of academic learning has been shown to increase the effectiveness of classroom instruction. However, existing research on multilingual learners (MLs) often focuses on their pedagogical and linguistic needs, overlooking their perceptions of literacy learning. This research, part of a large‐scale, design‐based research (DBR) project, explores MLs' perceptions of literacy learning to increase the capacity of instruction through professional development to classroom teachers in a high‐needs school district. Using grounded theory coding, we analyzed MLs' responses from a self‐efficacy survey to gain insight into their perceptions of literacy learning. Those findings were used to inform DBR modifications, including creating a writing module, a JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion) Escape Room, and a course for ML caregivers. By centering the voices of MLs, this study provides actionable implications for teachers and researchers, contributing to a deeper understanding of literacy education. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering student perceptions in curriculum and instructional design to meet the needs of diverse learners.
Journal Article•10.5539/ies.v18n5p171•
Exploring Incentive Mechanisms for the Sustainable Professional Development of Young Teachers in Vocational Colleges in Hunan Province

[...]

Qian Liu, Thanida Sujarittham, Sarayuth Sethakhajorn, Phatchareephorn Bangkheow, Trai Unyapoti, S Wuttiprom, Jintawat Tanamatayarat 
29 Sep 2025-International Education Studies
TL;DR: This study investigates incentive mechanisms for young teachers in Hunan Province's vocational colleges, revealing significant relationships among dimensions of personal, professional, and interpersonal needs, and recommending tailored incentives to foster sustainable professional development and retention.
Abstract: This study investigates incentive mechanisms for the sustainable professional development of young teachers in vocational colleges in Hunan Province, focusing on perceptions, relationships among key factors, and demographic influences. A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilizing both a questionnaire and open-ended questions. The study sampled 248 young teachers from three purposively selected colleges, ensuring proportional representation across institutions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze four dimensions: Teachers’ Personal Material Needs (TPMN), Teachers’ Professional Development (TPD), Teachers’ Interpersonal Needs (TIN), and Teachers’ Satisfaction with Incentive Mechanisms (TSIM). Inferential analyses, including Pearson correlation and regression, revealed significant relationships among these dimensions, with TIN demonstrating the strongest predictive power for sustainable professional development. Demographic factors such as years of experience, job titles, and salary significantly influenced perceptions, while educational background showed no notable differences. Findings highlighted moderate satisfaction across all dimensions, with material needs and financial incentives identified as key areas for improvement. While professional development and interpersonal recognition were viewed positively, issues regarding fairness and transparency in career progression remained prevalent. Qualitative insights emphasized better material provisions, transparent evaluation systems, and more supportive workplace relationships. To foster sustainable professional development, the study recommends improving salary structures, establishing equitable and transparent career advancement systems, and enhancing workplace recognition. Tailored incentive mechanisms that align with teachers’ diverse needs are essential for creating an inclusive environment that supports growth, satisfaction, and retention. These findings provide valuable guidance for optimizing incentive mechanisms in vocational colleges.
Journal Article•10.21203/rs.3.rs-7622889/v1•
TPACK-based Professional Development for the AI Era: Fostering Pre-service Teachers' Acceptance of Generative AI in Mathematics Classrooms

[...]

Shreejana Shrestha, J. I. Yi
17 Sep 2025
TL;DR: This study evaluates a 90-minute TPACK-based professional development workshop's impact on pre-service teachers' acceptance of Generative AI in mathematics classrooms, revealing statistically significant positive shifts in technology acceptance and identifying key facilitators and barriers to adoption.
Abstract: Abstract As Generative AI (GenAI) becomes more prevalent, the need to prepare pre-service teachers (PSTs) for its use is a critical challenge for mathematics teacher educators (MTEs). Yet, little is known about how to best foster PSTs’ adoption and critical use of GenAI in mathematics classrooms. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the impact of a 90-minute professional development workshop, grounded in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, on PSTs’ technology acceptance in mathematics education. A mixed-methods design was employed, using pre- and post-surveys based on an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model for quantitative data and semi-structured interviews and workshop discussions for qualitative data. Quantitative analysis revealed statistically significant positive shifts in many aspects of technology acceptance, except for PSTs’ perceived risks of the technology. Qualitative analysis identified key facilitators to adoption, such as GenAI's utility for instructional efficiency, alongside significant barriers, including the lack of clear institutional guidance. The findings demonstrate that TPACK-based professional development opportunities can enhance PSTs’ responsible adoption of GenAI in mathematics education. This study provides actionable implications for MTEs on designing pedagogically grounded training that addresses GenAI's practical applications and ethical complexities in mathematics classrooms.
Journal Article•10.1187/cbe.24-11-0274•
Longitudinal Study of the FIRST IV Program: Biology Departments' Influence on Teaching

[...]

Diane Ebert‐May, Jessica Middlemis Maher, Lucas B. Hill, Adam Grimm
26 Aug 2025-CBE- Life Sciences Education
TL;DR: A longitudinal study of the FIRST IV program found that departmental environments significantly influence faculty teaching development, with departments fostering competence, autonomy, and community essential for lasting change in pedagogy and faculty growth.
Abstract: We explored the experience of biology faculty who completed the Faculty Institutes for Reforming Science Teaching (FIRST IV) program as postdoctoral fellows up to 13 years previously to better understand teaching professional development benefits for future faculty, and what departments can do to advance learner-centered teaching. We describe three kinds of departmental environments that can affect faculty in developing and maintaining three psychological elements needed for workplace satisfaction (competence, autonomy, and community) as defined by self-determination theory (SDT). We designed a reflection exercise for faculty that inquired about the three elements of SDT they experienced in their current departments. The response data were coded and reported as vignettes, a creative medium that illustrates the significant role that departments play in nurturing faculty growth, and development in pedagogy. The findings suggest that teaching development programs alone cannot affect deep and lasting change without departments that foster faculty competence, autonomy, and community. We can train current and future faculty to teach well, but authentic change will only happen with departmental support.
Journal Article•10.29333/iji.2025.18437a•
Exploring In-Service English Teachers’ Reflective Practice for Professional Development in Chinese Higher Education

[...]

Yan Sun, Nur Jahan Ahmad
19 Sep 2025-International Journal of Instruction
TL;DR: This study explores in-service English teachers' reflective practice in Chinese higher education, analyzing journals and surveys to identify key focusing areas and the significance of reflection in teacher professional development.
Abstract: Reflective practice is widely recognized as an essential component of teacher professional development (TPD), and journal writing is an effective way to enhance teachers’ engagement in it. This study explores how in-service English teachers perceive and implement reflective practice, and how it contributes to their professional growth. Despite its importance, few studies have systematically examined how experienced teachers reflect on their English teaching. Using a mixed-methods approach, this research analysed six weeks of reflective journals written by six in-service English teachers with 7–26 years of experience, employing thematic analysis. It also incorporated open-ended survey responses from over 180 teachers, analysed using multiple response analysis (MRA) to triangulate and complement findings. Five key focusing areas emerged: (1) evaluating teaching, (2) approaches and methods, (3) theories of teaching, (4) self-awareness, and (5) cross-cultural communication. Survey results confirmed the significant role of reflection in TPD, and revealed after-lesson individual reflection was the most common practice. The study offers insights into how experienced English teachers reflect on their teaching practices and how such reflection supports their professional development, providing practical implications for future TPD initiatives.
Journal Article•10.1002/ace.70005•
Learning and Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

[...]

Jennifer C. Friberg, Melanie Hamilton
02 Sep 2025-New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education
TL;DR: This article outlines critical steps for faculty to transition from scholarly teaching to the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), exploring pathways for learning, data collection, and institutional support to develop a scholarly teaching identity.
Abstract: ABSTRACT This article focuses on learning that can facilitate the transition from being a scholarly teacher to becoming a scholar of teaching and learning, outlining the critical steps faculty can take to deepen their engagement with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It begins by distinguishing between scholarly teaching, which involves applying research‐based strategies in the classroom, and being a SoTL scholar, which requires faculty to systematically investigate their own teaching practices and the learning outcomes of their students. The article explores various pathways through which course instructors can learn and engage with SoTL, such as attending workshops, collaborating with colleagues in interdisciplinary communities, or engaging with existing SoTL literature. It discusses how faculty can identify areas of inquiry in their teaching practice, collect and analyze data, and use this evidence to refine and transform their teaching methods. The article also highlights institutional support structures that can facilitate this transition, including mentorship, funding for SoTL research, and peer review opportunities. Through these approaches, faculty can develop a scholarly identity in teaching and contribute meaningfully to the field.
Journal Article•10.1080/10899995.2025.2530764•
Factors influencing undergraduate geoscience instructors’ decisions to attend institutional teaching-focused professional development programs and implement research-based teaching methods

[...]

Collette Wilfong, Leilani Arthurs
16 Jul 2025-Journal of geoscience education
Journal Article•10.70623/leqx4221•
Beyond Lecturing: Christian Higher Education Faculty Perceptions of Professional Development Expectations and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction

[...]

1 Jan 2025
Journal Article•10.1080/19415257.2025.2523321•
Exploring the utility of #TeacherTok as a classroom management development tool

[...]

Sarah K. Ura, Sarah Jerasa
25 Jun 2025-Journal of In-service Education
Journal Article•10.1002/cc.70008•
Doing More Together: Collaborative Leadership Models in Community College Faculty Development

[...]

Stephanie Whalen, Jennifer Kelley, Majda Schmidt, Holly Rey, Page Wolf 
18 Sep 2025-New Directions for Community Colleges
TL;DR: This study examines collaborative leadership models in community college faculty development, highlighting shared responsibility between faculty and administrators that supports responsive, sustainable, and effective professional learning through relationship-driven infrastructures and diverse approaches to shared leadership.
Abstract: ABSTRACT This article examines collaborative leadership models in faculty development at five community colleges in Northern Illinois, highlighting how shared responsibility between faculty and administrators supports more responsive, sustainable, and effective professional learning. Through rich, practice‐based descriptions, each case explores the relationship‐driven infrastructures that enable cross‐role collaboration, align faculty development with institutional goals, and meet the evolving needs of students and educators. By foregrounding diverse approaches to shared leadership, this article offers practice insight for faculty developers, center directors, and higher education leaders seeking to design inclusive and impactful professional learning structures.
Journal Article•10.1080/19415257.2025.2544293•
Improving K–12 STEM teacher self-efficacy: a scoping review of experimental professional development trials

[...]

Xuan Zhou, Lina Shu, Tian Chen, Zhihong Xu, Yolanda N. Padrón 
29 Aug 2025-Journal of In-service Education
...

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve