TL;DR: D dosage reduction of vinblastine to 0.3 mg/kg can produce equivalent therapeutic results with diminished toxicity, and it is no longer recommended to recommend the 0.4mg/kg vin Blastine dosage.
Abstract: Seventy-eight patients with disseminated testicular cancer were entered on a random prospective study evaluating three separate remission induction arms. Therapy with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (20 mg/M2 for five consecutive days every three weeks for 3-4 courses) and bleomycin (30 units intravenous push weekly for 12 consecutive weeks) was constant. Patients were allocated at random to one of the following induction regimens (in combination with platinum plus bleomycin): (1) vinblastine 0.4 mg/kg every three weeks for four courses; (2) vinblastine 0.3 mg/kg every three weeks for four courses; or (3) vinblastine 0.2 mg/kg plus Adriamycin 50 mg/M2 every three weeks for four courses. All patients received maintenance therapy with vinblastine 0.3 mg/kg once a month for 20 months (total therapy two years) unless progressive disease intervened. The incidence of granulocytopenic fever and sepsis was highest with regimen 1, as 9 patients (35%) developed granulocytopenic fever requiring hospitalization and antibiotics; only 4 (15%) patients on regimen 2 developed granulocytopenic fever. No patients on regimen 2 had documented sepsis. Fifty-three patients (68%) achieved complete remission and an additional 11 patients were rendered free of disease with surgical resection of residual localized disease. Fifty-three patients (68%) remain alive and continuously free of disease from 15+ to 39+ months. There was no difference in the complete remission rate or disease-free status with the higher dosage of vinblastine (regimen 1) during remission induction therapy compared to the less toxic lower dosage of vinblastine (regimen 2). This suggests that dosage reduction of vinblastine to 0.3 mg/kg can produce equivalent therapeutic results with diminished toxicity, and we no longer recommend the 0.4 mg/kg vinblastine dosage.
TL;DR: Analysis within groups having pain versus no pain at entry revealed a marked advantage after 80 weeks for chemotherapy when pain was initially present and a slight advantage during treatment (throughout follow‐up) when the pain was absent.
Abstract: A prospective trial from July 1976 to September 1980 by the National Prostatic Cancer Project randomized newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer patients to DES 1 mg orally three times daily or orchiectomy; or DES, 1 mg, three times daily, plus cyclophosphamide at 1 mg/m2 iv every three weeks, or cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 iv every three weeks plus estramustine phosphate (Estracyt) at 600 mg/m2 orally daily in three divided doses. There were 246 patients evaluated for response of 301 entered. These consisted of 83 on the DES/orchiectomy arm, 77 on DES plus cyclophosphamide, and 86 on Estracyt plus cyclophosphamide. Objective response rates, initially evaluated at 12 weeks, were similar among the treatments. However, chemotherapy as used in this study early in the diagnosis of metastatic disease appears to exhibit an improved effect on overall survival compared to hormone therapy alone. Analysis within groups having pain versus no pain at entry revealed a marked advantage after 80 weeks for chemotherapy when pain was initially present and a slight advantage during treatment (throughout follow-up) when the pain was absent. Median survival times were 92, 91, and 94 weeks, respectively, for the three treatments. The progression-free interval for responders showed no difference between initial treatments, although nearly one half of the patients are still in remission; hence, further follow-up will be essential. Side effects were not excessive for the chemotherapy treatment arms and patient compliance was good. This national multicenter trial provides the basis for further testing of chemotherapy agents at an earlier phase for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel given at the same dose intensity and administered weekly (arm A) or every 3 weeks (arm B), and to assess the safety of intravenous steroids versus standard peroral premedication.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel given at the same dose intensity and administered weekly (arm A) or every 3 weeks (arm B), and to assess the safety of intravenous steroids versus standard peroral premedication. Two hundred and eight patients with advanced ovarian cancer previously treated with no more than one platinum-containing regimen were randomized to receive either a weekly infusion of paclitaxel or an infusion every 3 weeks. The median delivered dose intensity was 77.6 mg/m 2 /week in the weekly arm, and 72.7 mg/m 2 /week in the every 3 weeks arm. WHO grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological toxicity occurred more frequently in arm B. No difference in number of severe events of hypersensitivity, response rate, time to progression or survival between arms was observed. Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 67 mg/m 2 /week was found to have a better safety profile and seemed to be as effective as the equivalently dosed schedule every 3 weeks. Intravenous st...
TL;DR: The use of weekly paclitaxel regimens is recommended for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer and the observed survival benefit does not seem to stem from an increased potency of the drug with weekly regimens.
TL;DR: This study demonstrates that this combination treatment with platinum and etoposide is highly effective in the management of brain metastases from breast carcinoma.
Abstract: Twenty-two consecutive patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma were treated with a combination of platinum (100 mg/m2 day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 days 4, 6, 8) every three weeks. Five (23%) achieved a complete response (CR) while 7 (32%) obtained a partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 55%. The 95% confidence interval for combined CR and PR was 34-76%. Five patients received brain irradiation after reaching the maximum degree of objective remission by chemotherapy. Median duration of combined CR plus PR was 40 weeks (12+; 152). Median duration of survival was 58 weeks (2; 208+). Fifty-five percent of the patients were alive at one year. Our study demonstrates that this combination treatment is highly effective in the management of brain metastases from breast carcinoma.