TL;DR: Substantial skeletons of Eocene primates like those of adapoid Darwinius and Europolemur from Messel in Germany and Notharctus and Smilodectes from western North America constrain phylogenetic interpretation of primate relationships much more than dental remains ever can.
Abstract: The mammalian order Primates made its first appearance in the fossil record during the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum (PETM), the global greenhouse warming event that marks the beginning of the Eocene. Two primate superfamilies, Tarsioidea and Adapoidea, dominate early and middle Eocene primate faunas. Warm climates enabled primates to thrive, and warming events within the Eocene facilitated cosmopolitan dispersal. Declining diversity at the end of the Eocene reflects environmental cooling. Fossils of earliest Tarsioidea and Adapoidea are similar dentally, often confused, and appear closely related as stem or crown Haplorhini. The superfamily Tarsioidea is represented by a single genus, Tarsius, living today, while Adapoidea appear to be ancestral to living Anthropoidea. Little is known of the Eocene history of strepsirrhine Lemuroidea and Lorisoidea. Temporal scaling of molecular clock ages suggests that Strepsirrhini appeared before Haplorhini in the Paleocene or possibly with Haplorhini at the beginning of the Eocene. Substantial skeletons of Eocene primates like those of adapoid Darwinius and Europolemur from Messel in Germany and Notharctus and Smilodectes from western North America constrain phylogenetic interpretation of primate relationships much more than dental remains ever can. A specialised grasping foot distinguishes early primates from other mammals. Traits associated in a functional complex include replacement of claws by nails on all digits; movement of the pedal fulcrum from the metatarsals to the tarsals; elongation of digit IV relative to digit III, with reduction of digit II and sometimes III; and then secondary development of a grooming claw or claws on digits II and sometimes III. The specialised grasping foot of early primates was later moderated in the emergence of anthropoid primates.
TL;DR: The determining factor for lifestyle is the autopodia: 2D-mammals need nothing more than compression-transmitting balls with reinforced anterior margins (hooves) and primates as 3D-animals need prehensile hands and feet, which can transmit tensile forces and even torques.
Abstract: Eocene mammals from Grube Messel are divided into those that lived terrestrially on the ground (2D-mammals) or arboreally (3D-mammals). Their biomechanics and locomotion are discussed on the basis of equids (Eurohippus, Propalaeotherium) and Leptictidium as examples of 2D-mammals and primates (Europolemur, Darwinius) of 3D-mammals. The determining factor for lifestyle is the autopodia: 2D-mammals need nothing more than compression-transmitting balls with reinforced anterior margins (hooves). These autopodia do not require much energy, but metapodia and even phalanges can elongate the functional length of the free limbs. Primates as 3D-animals need prehensile hands and feet, which can transmit tensile forces and even torques. Their metapodials are part of the prehensile organ. Their strong and energy-requiring musculature increases the masses on the distal limb segments and so influences the locomotor modes.
TL;DR: In this article, the first primates from the Middle Eocene Eckfeld maar (SW Eifel, Germany) were described and determined as the cercamoniines Europolemur klatti and Periconodon sp.
Abstract: Two isolated upper molars and a mandible with an almost complete dentition represent the first primates from the Middle Eocene Eckfeld maar (SW Eifel, Germany). They are described and determined as the cercamoniines Europolemur klatti and Periconodon sp. respectively. The specimens result from excavations undertaken in 1995 by the “Naturhistorisches Museum Mainz/Landessammlung fur Naturkunde Rheinland-Pfalz”. Taxonomy, biochronology, palaeoecology, palaeobiogeography, and the taphonomy of the discoveries are discussed.
TL;DR: A detailed system of morphological types is established that differentiates pedal distal phalanges in adapoids, and it is shown that both species of Europolemur had a differentiated grooming claw.
Abstract: Pedal distal phalanges of the Eocene adapoids Europolemur and Darwinius from Messel and Notharctus from Wyoming have been compared morphologically and metrically to representatives of all six superfamilies of extant primates. A detailed system of morphological types is established that differentiates pedal distal phalanges. Four major groups and 12 types can be recognised in primates. Primates additionally show a primary interruption of homogeneity (PIH) between the hallux and other pedal rays, as well as two distinct secondary interruptions of homogeneity (SIH) within more lateral pedal rays. Using morphology, PIH and SIH, we have developed a formula for pedal distal phalanges. Differences among Adapoidea are unexpectedly large. Notharctus shows less differentiation in the pedal phalanges than does Europolemur. Our analyses show that both species of Europolemur had a differentiated grooming claw. Preservation of the second distal phalanx in Darwinius is not sufficient for a detailed classification. Despite similarities of the grooming claws of Europolemur to those of some lemurs and lorises, we hesitate to classify adapoids with Lemuroidea and Lorisoidea as there are significant differences and a possibility of parallelism.