About: Epeirogenic movement is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 419 publications have been published within this topic receiving 17668 citations. The topic is also known as: epeirogeny.
TL;DR: The structural development of the Iranian ranges has certain peculiarities which contradict the conventional geosynclinal theory of mountain building as mentioned in this paper, and the conventional tripartite division of Iran into an extensive median mass and two bordering ranges of geosyclinal origin (Zagros, Alborz) cannot be maintained.
Abstract: The structural development of the Iranian ranges has certain peculiarities which contradict the conventional geosynclinal theory of mountain building. Early orogenic movements resulted in the consolidation of the Precambrian basement and the formation of a vast Iranian platform considered to be an extension of the Arabian shield. Only epeirogenic movements affected the region during the Paleozoic, which is represented by typical platform deposits. However, most of Iran went through all stages of a complete Alpine orogeny in spite of the prevailing platform character in preorogenic time. Important trends in the Alpine structural plan clearly were inherited from Precambrian structures. Precursory Alpine movements in Mesozoic time were strongest in Central Iran, although this region and the closely related Alborz (Elburz) Mountain area generally retained their epicontinental character, allowing for only a rudimentary geosynclinal development. More clearly geosynclinal conditions developed in peripheral fold belts: the Zagros, the Kopet Dagh, and the East Iranian ranges. Strong folding and thrusting during the Alpine orogeny proper in Late Cretaceous-Tertiary time affected most of Iran except the rigid Lut block in the eastern part of the country. The conventional tripartite division of Iran into an extensive median mass and two bordering ranges of geosynclinal origin (Zagros, Alborz) cannot be maintained. The writer replaces this oversimplified interpretation by recognizing the existence of more structural zones which differ in structural development and present tectonic style.
TL;DR: The stratigraphy and correlation of Triassic to Plio-Pleistocene sediments within the Iranian Oil Consortium Agreement Area are discussed in this paper, where rock-stratigraphic units are named and defined.
Abstract: The stratigraphy and correlation of Triassic to Plio-Pleistocene sediments within the Iranian Oil Consortium Agreement Area are discussed. Rock-stratigraphic units are named and defined. These are correlated with the Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabian stratigraphic successions. The Agreement Area, situated northeast of the Arabian shelf and including part of the Zagros orogenic area, has been the site of more or less continuous sedimentation from Triassic to Plio-Pleistocene time. Regional disconformities occur at the top of the Aptian, the Cenomanian-Turonian, the Cretaceous, and the Eocene. A major angular unconformity produced by Mio-Pliocene folding occurs at the top of the Fars Group. Carbonate and shale deposition controlled by epeirogenic movements dominated until Late Cretaceous time when movements within the Zagros area began to influence sedimentation. Upper Cretaceous, Paleocene, Eocene, and Oligocene deposits are characterized by sharp facies and thickness changes as a result of orogenic movements in the Zagros area. Following deposition of the O igocene-lower Miocene Asmari Formation the Agreement Area was part of a trough trending northwest-southeast. After initial evaporitic and marine phases, this trough was filled by clastics derived from the rising Zagros Mountains on the northeast. Conglomerates of the Bakhtyari, deposited unconformably upon the Fars Group, mark the end of this basinal filling.
TL;DR: In this article, a mechanism is proposed to explain epeirogenic motions of craton interiors in terms of the response of the lithosphere to subduction by analyzing the tilt of chronostratigraphic sequences in which the bounding horizons were deposited at approximately the same elevation with respect to sea level.
Abstract: A mechanism is proposed to explain epeirogenic motions of craton interiors in terms of the response of the lithosphere to subduction. The effects of changes in sea level are distinguished from subsidence of the basement by analyzing the tilt of chronostratigraphic sequences in which the bounding horizons were deposited at approximately the same elevation with respect to sea level. As an example, the Late Cretaceous subsidence and Tertiary uplift of the western interior of North America is examined, and a maximum tilt amplitude of 3 km, with a horizontal deflection scale of approximately 1400 km, is inferred. The link between platform sedimentation and subduction is tested by using numerical models of mantle convection which mimic the subduction and by examining the horizontal scale of the deflections to the overlying lithosphere. It is found that this scale is relatively insensitive to the temperature contrast between the slab and the surrounding mantle, the flexural rigidity of the lithosphere, and even the physical process assumed to govern the subduction. The most important factor affecting the scale is the dip of the subduction zone, and shallower subduction angles (less than 45°) can produce horizontal deflections of the order of 1000 km or more. In contrast, the vertical scale of the deflection is sensitive to all the above parameters. Using these results, two subduction models are introduced which predict both the time and length scales of the North American tilt, and it is conjectured that the process may be responsible for other regions of platform subsidence where subducted lithosphere may have passed beneath the continent at a shallow angle.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the often cryptic warping associated with incipient and smaller-scale epeirogenic deformation in both modern and ancient settings by recognizing tectonic tilting effects on rivers and their resultant sediments.
TL;DR: In this paper, the Cenozoic fill of the Gulf of Mexico basin contains a continuous record of sediment supply from the North American continental interior for the past 65 million years, and sediment volume was calculated from digitized hand-contoured unit thickness maps using a geographic information system (GIS) algorithm to sum volumes within polygons bounding interpreted North American river contribution.
Abstract: The Cenozoic fill of the Gulf of Mexico basin contains a continuous record of sediment supply from the North American continental interior for the past 65 million years. Regional mapping of unit thickness and paleogeography for 18 depositional episodes defines patterns of shifting entry points of continental fluvial systems and quantifies the total volume of sediment supplied during each episode. Eight fluvio-deltaic axes are present: the Rio Bravo, Rio Grande, Guadalupe, Colorado, Houston-Brazos, Red, Mississippi, and Tennessee axes. Sediment volume was calculated from digitized hand-contoured unit thickness maps using a geographic information system (GIS) algorithm to sum volumes within polygons bounding interpreted North American river contribution. General age-dependent compaction factors were used to convert calculated volume to total grain volume. Values for rate of supply range from >150 km to <10 km3/Ma.
Paleogeographic maps for eleven Cenozoic time intervals display the evolving matrix of elevated source areas, intracontinental sediment repositories, known and inferred drainage elements, and depositional fluvial/deltaic depocenters along the northern Gulf of Mexico basin margin. Patterns of sediment supply in time and space record the complex interplay of intracontinental tectonism, climate change, and drainage basin evolution. Five tectono-climatic eras are differentiated: Paleocene late Laramide era; early to middle Eocene terminal Laramide era; middle Cenozoic (Late Eocene–Early Miocene) dry, volcanogenic era; middle Neogene (Middle–Late Miocene) arid, extensional era; and late Neogene (Plio–Pleistocene) monsoonal, epeirogenic uplift era. Through most of the Cenozoic, three to four independent continental-scale drainage basins have supplied sediment to the Gulf of Mexico.