About: Entoprocta is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 69 publications have been published within this topic receiving 2381 citations. The topic is also known as: entoprocts & entoproct.
TL;DR: The trochaea theory predicts that Porifera and Cnidaria have only monociliate cells and lack ciliary bands used in filter-feeding, and that the gastroneuralian larvae have downstream-collecting ciliated bands with prototroch and metatroch of compound cilia on multiciliate cells.
Abstract: Ciliated epithelia, especially the ciliary bands used in swimming and filter feeding, of representatives of the following phyla have been investigated: Porifera, Cnidaria, Annelida, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Nemertini, Platyhelminthes, Entoprocta, Ectoprocta, Rotifera, Pterobranchia, Phoronida, Brachiopoda, Echinodermata and Enteropneusta. The trochaea theory predicts that Porifera and Cnidaria have only monociliate cells and lack ciliary bands used in filter-feeding, that the gastroneuralian larvae have downstream-collecting ciliary bands with prototroch and metatroch of compound cilia on multiciliate cells, and that notoneuralian larvae have an upstream-collecting neotroch on monociliate cells. The observations generally fit these predictions and the exceptions are discussed. In all the ciliated epithelia, except that of the sponge larva, each ciliated cell has an accessory centriole perpendicular to the basal body of the cilium and situated on its downstream side.
TL;DR: The results favour the conclusion that the trochophore, if defined as a feeding larval form using opposed bands, should not be regarded as an ancestral (= plesiomorphic) type for the Spiralia, or any other large taxon such as the Polychaeta or Mollusca.
Abstract: «Trochophore» is a term used in a strict sense for larvae having an opposed-band method of feeding, involving a prototroch and metatroch. Other ciliary bands such as a telotroch and neurotroch may be present. The trochophore has been proposed to represent the ancestral larval form for a group of metazoan phyla (including all members of the Spiralia). The name trochophore is also often applied to larvae that do not conform to the above definition. A cladistic analysis of spiralian taxa (with special reference to polychaete annelids), based on a suite of adult and larval characters, is used to assess several hypotheses: (1) that the trochophore (in a strict sense) is a plesiomorphic form for the Spiralia; (2) that the strictly defined trochophore is plesiomorphic for members of the Spiralia such as the Polychaeta. The homology of each of the various separate ciliary bands of spiralian larvae, and features such as the apical tuft and protonephridia is also assessed. The results favour the conclusion that the trochophore, if defined as a feeding larval form using opposed bands, should not be regarded as an ancestral (= plesiomorphic) type for the Spiralia, or any other large taxon such as the Polychaeta or Mollusca. The evidence suggests that the various ciliary bands have differing evolutionary histories, and only the Echiura (possibly an annelid group) has members with the classical trochophore. The trochophore is re-defined as a larval form with a prototroch. This broad definition covers a wide variety of larvae, and matches the current usage more accurately than the restricted term. Features such as the neurotroch, telotroch and opposed-band feeding show convergence and reversals. The nature of the metatroch requires further investigation. The presence of a prototroch (and hence trochophore larvae) is used to identify an apomorphy-based taxon, Trochozoa, that includes the first ancestor to have evolved a prototroch and all its descendants. This minimally includes the Annelida (sensu lato), Echiura, Entoprocta, Mollusca and Sipuncula and is a less inclusive taxon than the Spiralia.
TL;DR: Phylogenetic analyses show that entoprocts and lophophorates have spiralian, protostomous affinities, and advocate a Spiralia-Radialia-based classification rather than one based on the Protostomia-Deuterostomía concept.
Abstract: The Ento- and Ectoprocta are sometimes placed together in the Bryozoa, which have variously been regarded as proto- or deuterostomes. However, Entoprocta have also been allied to the pseudocoelomates, while Ectoprocta are often united with the Brachiopoda and Phoronida in the (super)phylum Lophophorata. Hence, the phylogenetic relationships of these taxa are still much debated. We determined complete 18S rRNA sequences of two entoprocts, an ectoproct, an inarticulate brachiopod, a phoronid, two annelids, and a platyhelminth. Phylogenetic analyses of these data show that (1) entoprocts and lophophorates have spiralian, protostomous affinities, (2) Ento- and Ectoprocta are not sister taxa, (3) phoronids and brachiopods form a monophyletic clade, and (4) neither Ectoprocta or Annelida appear to be monophyletic. Both deuterostomous and pseudocoelomate features may have arisen at least two times in evolutionary history. These results advocate a Spiralia-Radialia-based classification rather than one based on the Protostomia-Deuterostomia concept.
TL;DR: The morphology of Emschermannia may be considered intermediate between that of solitary and colonial forms, with relevance to evolutionary development within Entoprocta.
Abstract: A new genus and species of solitary entoproct, Emschermannia ramificata , is described from the Kara Sea. It is an epibiont of the nephtyid polychaete Aglaophamus malmgreni , collected from 25–472 m depth. The species is about 250–300 μm long, with 8–10 tentacles, and buds are formed from a frontal area of the calyx. The calyx and stalk are not separated from each other by a cuticular septum, and a star-cell complex is absent. Emschermannia ramificata attaches to a substratum via a basal plate from which pseudostolons grow. Zooidal morphology conforms to that of the Loxosomatidae, but the attachment structure is unique among solitary entoprocts; it resembles basal plates and stolons of colonial entoprocts, but pseudostolons of Emschermannia serve only for attachment, not for budding. Overall, the morphology of Emschermannia may be considered intermediate between that of solitary and colonial forms, with relevance to evolutionary development within Entoprocta.