About: Encephalization quotient is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 81 publications have been published within this topic receiving 5715 citations.
TL;DR: The outstanding intelligence of humans appears to result from a combination and enhancement of properties found in non-human primates, such as theory of mind, imitation and language, rather than from 'unique' properties.
TL;DR: Re-examination of brain–body size relationships for large samples of species from three major vertebrate groups now shows that there is no empirical foundation for the concept of scaling to body surface area, and it seems that brain size may be linked to maternal metabolic turnover.
Abstract: Studies of the relationship between brain size and body size in terrestrial verteberates have a long history1–4. Demonstrations of regular relationships between brain and body size across species within selected vertebrate groups serve two purposes: (1) in comparison of species of different body size, empirically recognized ‘scaling effects’ can be taken into account; (2) empirical relationships may suggest useful working hypotheses regarding functional constraints (although they cannot directly reveal casual connections). It is widely accepted5,6 that brain size is scaled to keep pace with changes in body surface area (rather than volume), and this provides the basis for many interpretations of relative brain size. Re-examination of brain–body size relationships for large samples of species from three major vertebrate groups (mammals, birds, reptiles) now shows that there is no empirical foundation for the concept of scaling to body surface area. Instead, it seems that brain size may be linked to maternal metabolic turnover. This has implications not only for assessment of relative brain size in particular species, but also for pursuing links between brain size and ‘life strategies’.
TL;DR: In birds, innovation rate is associated with the ability of species to deal with seasonal changes in the environment and to establish themselves in new regions, and it also appears to be related to the rate at which lineages diversify.
Abstract: Several comparative research programs have focused on the cognitive, life history and ecological traits that account for variation in brain size. We review one of these programs, a program that uses the reported frequency of behavioral innovation as an operational measure of cognition. In both birds and primates, innovation rate is positively correlated with the relative size of association areas in the brain, the hyperstriatum ventrale and neostriatum in birds and the isocortex and striatum in primates. Innovation rate is also positively correlated with the taxonomic distribution of tool use, as well as interspecific differences in learning. Some features of cognition have thus evolved in a remarkably similar way in primates and at least six phyletically-independent avian lineages. In birds, innovation rate is associated with the ability of species to deal with seasonal changes in the environment and to establish themselves in new regions, and it also appears to be related to the rate at which lineages diversify. Innovation rate provides a useful tool to quantify inter-taxon differences in cognition and to test classic hypotheses regarding the evolution of the brain.
TL;DR: This estimate of general cognitive ability across primates is not strongly correlated with neuroanatomical measures that statistically control for a possible effect of body size, such as encephalization quotient or brain size residuals, and there was no indication that neocortex-based measures were superior to measures based on the whole brain.
Abstract: For over a century, various neuroanatomical measures have been employed as assays of cognitive ability in comparative studies. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether these measures actually correspond to cognitive ability. A recent meta-analysis of cognitive performance of a broad set of primate species has made it possible to provide a quantitative estimate of general cognitive ability across primates. We find that this estimate is not strongly correlated with neuroanatomical measures that statistically control for a possible effect of body size, such as encephalization quotient or brain size residuals. Instead, absolute brain size measures were the best predictors of primate cognitive ability. Moreover, there was no indication that neocortex-based measures were superior to measures based on the whole brain. The results of previous comparative studies on the evolution of intelligence must be reviewed with this conclusion in mind.
TL;DR: It is apparent that the (significant) increase in volume documented for the Middle Pleistocene individuals is not simply a consequence of larger body mass, and Encephalization quotient values confirm this finding.