About: Emoia is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 68 publications have been published within this topic receiving 957 citations. The topic is also known as: Emoias & Skinks.
TL;DR: Osteological and morphological characters are used to divide the skinks traditionally placed in the catchall genus Leiolopisma and their relatives into three major groups comprising 22 genera.
Abstract: Osteological and morphological characters are used to divide the skinks traditionally placed in the catchall genus Leiolopisma and their relatives into three major groups comprising 22 genera. Group I includes Scincella, Ablepharus, Lobulia, gen. nov., Lipinia, and Prasinohaema, gen. nov.; Group II includes Eugongylus, Tachygia, Phoboscincus, gen. nov., Morethia, Emoia, Cryptoblepharus, Leiolopisma, Proablepharus, and Anotis; Group III includes Lampropholis, Geomyersia, Notoscincus, Carlia, Menetia, Panaspis, Cophoscincopus, and Afroablepharus. A diagnosis, generic key, and a discussion of broad phylogenetic relationships are provided for each major group, and a generic synonymy, diagnosis, list of species, range map and a discussion of distribution and intergeneric relationships are provided for each genus.
TL;DR: The hypothesis that skinks colonized Tasmantis by over-water dispersal initially to New Caledonia, then to Lord Howe Island, and finally to New Zealand is supported, and the lineage is 35.4-40.74 million years old.
TL;DR: Emoia cyanura and Emoia impar, recognized recently as cryptic species of skinks sympatric throughout much of the Pacific, are here each shown to be composed of several genetically distinct but morphologically similar lineages.
Abstract: It has been suggested recently that morphological and genetic evolution may be decoupled in skinks, resulting in morphological similarity between species despite extensive genetic divergence. Emoia cyanura and Emoia impar , recognized recently as cryptic species of skinks sympatric throughout much of the Pacific, are here each shown to be composed of several genetically distinct (on the basis of mitochondrial DNA sequences) but morphologically similar lineages. Furthermore, similarly coloured polymorphic individuals are found in both species, and these individuals have the same mtDNA haplotypes as their sympatric conspecifics. Although the morphological similarity of cryptic species is usually attributed to recent speciation, this is ruled out in the case of E. cyanura and E. impar , as both species are more closely related genetically to other currently recognized species than they are to each other. We suggest a genetic review of current Pacific skink systematics, given the possibility that morphologically indistinguishable populations may in fact represent cryptic species.