TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored what type of industries have higher portion of companies with market value below book value and studied the change of the market value/book value gap in different industries between year 2000 and year 2015.
Abstract: This study explores what type of industries have higher portion of companies with market value below book value. In addition, this paper studied the change of the market value/book value gap in different industries between year 2000 and year 2015. Using correlation analysis and LOS regression, we tried to quantify the relationship between the market value/book value gap and firm characters. Furthermore, our quantitative results suggest that by forecasting market value/book value gap, we could make speculative investments and gain positive return by longing stocks with lower than expected market value.
TL;DR: The main idea of as mentioned in this paper is the importance of determination of the fair book entry value of these balance elements in accounting, because the users of the accounting-financial information appreciate it very much.
Abstract: All elements of asset, debts and personal capitals are presented in the financial statements with a corresponding value. The main idea of this article is the importance of determination of the fair book entry valueof these balance elementsin accounting, because the users of the accounting-financial information appreciate it very much. In the following pages, we shall present some important aspects regarding the value concept in accounting,the main types of values, economic factors which determin this value, all this informationsustaining the central idea of the article.
TL;DR: In this paper, the feasibility of using such a tool in a funds business of an international investment bank where parts of this process are based in Asia and Europe is investigated, based on surveying people that are currently working in the Net Asset Value validation process, and in turn analyse the results attained.
Abstract: Fund administration is a relatively new service that some banks and back office offer Investment Company’s. This service was regarded as “boutique” in some countries as it was not a necessity hence not enforced by law to have independent calculation and verification of a fund price. However, this sector of business was and has been a major factor in the economic boom for many countries worldwide. In general most companies have many human resources tagged to this service. This is mainly due to the high volume of manual work that needs to be carried out to validate a Net Asset Value. If the Net Asset Value is calculated incorrectly and hence not validated correctly then there is huge repercussions for the company that calculated the Net Asset Value (monetary, reputation, losing a client). With the turn in the current climate the operational requirements that was once affordable has snowballed out of control, this is why invest company’s are finding ways to reduce costs and hence use less labour intensive methods or relocate these specific jobs to lower cost countries such as Eastern Europe and India. However, this is not without its own set of problems, some being that most companies and in our case, the company always employs a distributed service requirement. Within the scope of a collaboration project which focuses on a Net Asset Value automated validation solution to replace a labour intensive manual approach. In this paper, we research the feasibility of using such a tool in a funds business of an international investment bank where parts of this process are based in Asia and Europe. Our approach is based on surveying people that are currently working in the Net Asset Value validation process, and in turn analyse the results attained. Throughout this process, we must not only focus on the efficient method of applying a Net Asset Value validation automated solution but we must also provide an overview of the important factors in building a solutions to be used in a fund administration environment.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that such a definition is misleading and, instead of creating more transparency and robustness, it could end up in creating more confusion, and propose a new definition for market consistent embedded value (MCEV) instead of the present value of future profits.
Abstract: Since the beginning of the development of the so-called embedded value methodology, actuaries have been using the present value of future profits as yardstick when valuing life insurance activities. However, using profits as a fundamental input is subject to criticism because profits are no actual cash flows. In an attempt to create more transparency and robustness the CFO forum (2008) has set a definition for market consistent embedded value (MCEV). Nevertheless, this definition refers again to the present value of future profits. In this note we show that such a definition is misleading and, instead of creating more transparency, it could end up in creating more confusion.