TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a tax option-enhanced portfolio value, which is defined as the sum of the hold value and the value of the tax option, including time value.
Abstract: After-tax performance measurement requires a rigorous definition of after-tax portfolio value. An understanding of after-tax value is also a prerequisite for effective management of taxable portfolios. We propose that the tax option, which is the right to execute tax-beneficial transactions – colloquially referred to as ‘tax-loss selling’– should be included in the value of the portfolio.Currently there are several definitions of after-tax portfolio value in use, including ‘hold’ value and ‘intrinsic’ value. Hold value is the present value of the after-tax cash flows assuming a buy-and-hold strategy. The shortcoming of hold value is that it fails to consider tax-beneficial transactions. Intrinsic value partially corrects for this by recognizing current tax-beneficial transactions. However, intrinsic value does not consider potential future tax-beneficial transactions, i.e. the time value of the tax option. Our proposed definition of after-tax portfolio value is the sum of the hold value and the value of the tax option, including time value. Incorporating the time value of an option is in line with contemporary finance theory. The tax option can be valued with existing industry standard methodology, incorporating investor-specific parameters such as tax rates and mortality rates.Exercise of the tax option is a trade-off: cashflow savings in exchange for forfeited option value. Reinvestment of the proceeds automatically gives rise to a new tax option, whose value should be incorporated into the sale decision. Thus sale and reinvestment also entails swapping an in-the-money tax option for an at-the-money option. Reinvestment in a ‘like’ security ensures that the asset allocation and the risk characteristics of the portfolio remain the same. While the concept of the tax option is applicable to any asset class, municipal bonds, which are normally held in taxable accounts, are especially suitable to illustrate the basic concepts. Due to tax-related factors the hold value of a municipal bond can substantially differ from its market price. This contributes to the complexity of the valuation of the tax option, and it can guide issuers in designing products to appeal to tax-aware investors. According to our analysis, intermediate 5% bonds callable in 10 years are ideal tax-beneficial structures. Remarkably, this coincides with the current market practice of issuing 5% non-call 10 bonds. Unlike a conventional embedded bond option, such as a call or a put, the value of the tax option is not reflected in the market value of the portfolio. Nevertheless, this value should be recognized. Even if option-enhanced value is not practical for external reporting, it provides an added dimension for the portfolio manager by quantifying the value of potential tax-beneficial trading opportunities.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce prevention in a model of insurance and study the equilibrium of a game, where the agent may by testing acquire an information about his loss probability, and point out that the value of information is a complex concept.
Abstract: This paper introduces prevention in a model of insurance and studies the equilibrium of a game, where the agent may by testing acquire an information about his loss probability. We point out that the value of information is a complex concept. Contrary to main papers that define at most two ways of measuring the value of information, five definitions make sense in our setting. This enlargement allows to precise the working mechanisms.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors confine themselves to one standard of value market value and survey several of the usual premises of value which can complement it, in order to cut down on the proliferation of the number of separate standards of value.
Abstract: A premise of value when attached to a standard of value in binary combination completes the description of a transactional event. In this paper we confine ourselves to one standard of value market value and survey several of the usual premises of value which can complement it. Use of a premise of value to qualify a standard of value also serves to cut down on the proliferation of the number of separate standards of value. As a byproduct of our delving into the theoretical structure of standards and premises of value we discern possible additions to the plant & machinery valuer's toolkit.
TL;DR: The Value Measurement and Reporting on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital Assets (VMRC) as mentioned in this paper is a global effort intended to help boards of directors, senior management, investors and other stakeholders make better strategic decisions using value measurement and reporting.
Abstract: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * THE VALUE MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING Collaborative (VMRC) is a global effort intended to help boards of directors, senior management, investors and other stakeholders make better strategic decisions using value measurement and reporting. Its members believe the value of a company lies not only in its present operational value but also in its potential to create value in the future. * BUSINESSES REPORT VERY LITTLE EXTERNALLY about their human, relational or organizational capital. As a result it's difficult for investors to know how well a company measures or manages factors that have the potential to create future value. The VMRC did research on how human capital, customers and clients and innovation affect future value creation in three industries--natural resources, pharmaceuticals and telecommunications. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * A LARGE MAJORITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES companies did not disclose any measures that would allow observers to better understand the value of their customer base. Among pharmaceutical companies, only 19% commented on human capital and even then it was to report only the number of employees. * THE VMRC RESEARCH CONFIRMED THERE IS LITTLE publicly available information on the factors that drive a business's future value. No companies in the three sectors commented about the number of product categories purchased per customer or the expected life of a customer. Only pharmaceuticals companies disclosed products they had under development. * WHILE MORE WORK IS NEEDED BEFORE COMPANIES disclose information about their potential for future growth, some have begun to reveal these critical data. Two companies in the research sample disclosed information about their virtual R&D team and two others provided details about the number of new ideas they had generated. What creates value in a company? The Value Measurement and Reporting Collaborative (VMRC) believes value is defined not only in monetary units but also in objects, ideas, events or processes. The VMRC, in which the AICPA participates, is a global effort of the accounting profession to help boards of directors, senior management, investors and other stakeholders make better strategic decisions using value measurement and reporting. Its members say a company's worth exists not only in its present operational value as accounted for historically in its financial statements, but also in its potential to create future value. Managing the factors that influence corporate performance is one way management adds value to the bottom line. Every investment analyst tries to look beyond the financial data for information about a company's potential. Accordingly, CPAs in senior management, board members, analysts and investors should be interested in a framework of principles and criteria to measure and report value creation and maintenance. Research undertaken on the VMRC's behalf by Roland J. Burgman, Reporting on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital Assets, shows the market value of equity and net debt is larger than the present value of current operations for companies in the Russell 3000 index (excluding real estate companies). This difference between the two--which the research refers to as a company's intellectual capital of a human, relational or organizational nature--is called future growth value. THE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE VALUE Depending on the definition, intellectual capital can be the term for all value drivers or value drivers can encompass intellectual capital. Regardless of how CPAs apply the term, the issue is that while information about factors that have the potential to create value may be available internally, businesses report very little of it externally. Companies sometimes disclose future value information quantitatively or qualitatively in a management discussion and analysis (MD&A) statement, in the president's message or on their corporate Web sites. …