About: EMA401 is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 20 publications have been published within this topic receiving 541 citations. The topic is also known as: [S]-enantiomer of EMA400 & [S]-enantiomer of PD-126,055.
TL;DR: EMA401 (100 mg twice daily) provides superior relief of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at the end of 28 days of treatment and was well tolerated by patients.
TL;DR: The angiotensin II (AngII) receptor subtype 2 (AT2R) is expressed in sensory neurons and may play a role in nociception and neuronal regeneration.
TL;DR: Some forms of direct influence on voltage-gated ion channels have a place in the treatment of NP, while the development of entirely novel Ang II AT2 receptor antagonists or NGF inhibitors may be available for many chronic pain sufferers in the foreseeable future.
Abstract: Introduction: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition that arises from a lesion or dysfunction of the somatosensory nervous system. However, there are several new targets and novel technologies in the pipeline to address this unmet medical need.Areas covered: In this review, the authors briefly discuss a direction of the development of agents that could be potentially used in NP treatment. Special attention is paid to 1.7-selective voltage-gated sodium channels, N-type voltage-gated calcium channels, angiotensin II (Ang II) AT2 receptors and nerve growth factor (NGF) as promising targets for new drugs. Furthermore, the article also presents and discusses, in detail, the results of Phase II clinical studies with the AT2 receptor antagonist − EMA401 in NP (the results of Phase II clinical trials of other described compounds are not available, yet).Expert opinion: There is a real hope that new drugs for NP may be available soon. This hope is based on advancing methods of genomics, developing new targets...
TL;DR: The AT2R is receiving considerable attention as a new therapeutic target with human validation for the relief of peripheral neuropathic and chronic inflammatory pain conditions on the basis of preclinical findings and recent clinical trial data showing that the peripherally restricted, small-molecule At2R antagonist EMA401 successfully alleviated neuropathic pain in a Phase II clinical trial.
Abstract: Introduction: Neuropathic pain and chronic inflammatory pain are large unmet medical needs. Over the past two decades, numerous ’pain targets’ have been identified for analgesic drug discovery. Despite promising results in rodent pain models, many compounds modulating such targets lacked efficacy in clinical trials. An exception is oral EMA401, a small-molecule angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) antagonist.Areas covered: Herein, angiotensin II/AT2R signaling-induced hyperexcitability and abnormal sprouting of cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons, together with radioligand binding, pharmacokinetics, analgesic efficacy and mode of action of small-molecule AT2R antagonists in rodent models of peripheral neuropathic and chronic inflammatory pain, are reviewed. The findings of a successful Phase IIa clinical trial of EMA401 in patients with neuropathic pain are presented in brief.Expert opinion: The functional importance of angiotensin II/AT2R signaling has remained enigmatic for decades, and there are no ...
TL;DR: The analgesic efficacy and safety of two phase 2b studies of EMA401 (a highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist) in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (EMPHENE) and painful diabetic neuropathy (EMPADINE) were reported as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The analgesic efficacy and safety of 2 phase 2b studies of EMA401 (a highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist) in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (EMPHENE) and painful diabetic neuropathy (EMPADINE) were reported. These were multicentre, randomised, double-blind treatment studies conducted in participants with postherpetic neuralgia or type I/II diabetes mellitus with painful distal symmetrical sensorimotor neuropathy. Participants were randomised 1:1:1 to either placebo, EMA401 25 mg, or 100 mg twice daily (b.i.d) in the EMPHENE and 1:1 to placebo or EMA401 100 mg b.i.d. in the EMPADINE. The primary outcome for both the studies was change in weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score, using a numeric rating scale from baseline to week 12. Both the studies were prematurely terminated due to preclinical hepatotoxicity on long-term dosing, although not observed in these studies. Out of the planned participants, a total of 129/360 (EMPHENE) and 137/400 (EMPADINE) participants were enrolled. The least square mean reduction in numeric rating scale pain score was numerically in favour of EMA401 100 mg arm in both EMPHENE (treatment difference: -0.5 [95% confidence interval: -1.6 to 0.6; P value: 0.35]) and EMPADINE (treatment difference: -0.6 [95% confidence interval: -1.4 to 0.1; P value: 0.10]) at the end of week 12. However, as the studies were terminated prematurely, no firm conclusion could be drawn but the consistent clinical improvement in pain intensity reduction across these 2 studies in 2 different populations is worth noting.