TL;DR: Practical work enhances the quality and extent of scientific understanding achieved by students and is critical for achieving expertise in the meaningful use of scientific procedures for problem solving and for applying scientific understanding to one’s own life.
Abstract: Educology is knowledge about education, and the educology of science education is knowledge about the process of teaching and studying science in some setting, e.g. in schools, colleges and universities. Part of scientific expertise is having the process skills associated with scientific inquiry. Expertise in science process skills is a basic and integral part of having effective science teaching skills. Such expertise obviously is not innate. One is not born with it. To become expert, one must receive guidance in the ways of scientific inquiry, and one must conduct extensive guided appropriate practice in the use of the skills of scientific inquiry. The development of skills in scientific inquiry requires that students of science be provided with appropriate and adequate guidance in their study of science. This guidance is to be found in the instructional programs provided by schools, colleges and universities. Competent, adequate and appropriate guidance must meet a number of conditions. These include guidance in practical work which enhances the quality of a teacher’s International Journal of Educology, 2002, Vol 16, No 1 12 learning. As Ausubel notes, practical work creates a “discovery-reception continuum” as opposed to a “meaningful rote learning” experience. In short, practical work enhances the quality and extent of scientific understanding achieved by students. Experiences for school students in their guided study of science should include experiences which promote process skills, such as measuring, observing, classifying and predicting. These skills are critical for the development of a worthwhile and fruitful understanding by students of scientific concepts and propositions. These experiences are also critical for achieving expertise in the meaningful use of scientific procedures for problem solving and for applying scientific understanding to one’s own life. The Nigerian context is one in which science teaching in primary and secondary schools all too often emphasizes rote learning without sufficient meanings and connections being made by students with their ordinary lives. Students often come away from science classes with a memorized set of definitions, but without a scientific attitude, without any appreciable expertise in scientific process skills and without any substantial ability to relate scientific concepts to their day-to-day lives. This state of affairs needs rectifying, and an obvious place to start is with the education of the teachers themselves (1) in science and (2) in the educology of science education.
TL;DR: The authors examined the role that theory and practice play in the preparation of new teachers and concluded that education is theory all the way down and that educologists in teacher education programs have a particular obligation to address theoretical issues in their work with future teachers.
Abstract: This study examines the role that theory and practice play in the preparation of new teachers. It presents multilayered observational, anecdotal and performance data relating to a group of undergraduate “interns” in an urban elementary teacher education program. These data lend support to the hypothesis that the understanding by new teachers of the relationship between theory and practice influences (1) the way they position themselves as professionals, (2) the conceptual stance they take in developing curriculum and (3) the degree to which they come to see themselves as change agents who can make a difference in the lives of children. Observational data are provided for four interns during their student teaching experience and two years later when they are teaching on their own. The authors conclude that education is theory all the way down and that educologists in teacher education programs have a particular obligation to address theoretical issues in their work with future teachers. International Journal of Educology, 2002, Vol 16, No 2
TL;DR: The relationship between psychology and education may be expressed in terms of two general models: the traditional hierarchical model, according to which psychology is the "parent" discipline; and a parallel model, in which the relationship between pure theory and its application is metaphoric rather than paradigmatic as mentioned in this paper.
TL;DR: In the 1990s, Croatian pedagogical theory and practice has featured developmental qualities of the so-called Germanic circle pedagogy, which was a normative and empirical science focused on practical learning about upbringing as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Until the 1990s, Croatian pedagogical theory and practice has featured developmental qualities of the so-called ‘Germanic circle pedagogy’. This means that it was a normative and empirical science focused on practical learning about upbringing. However, attempts to constitute pedagogy as a complete science about upbringing were not to be neglected. During the transition following the communist ideology’s collapse and the intensification of globalisation, pedagogy began to ‘Americanise’ terminology. This replaced the terms ‘education’ (Cro. ‘obrazovanje’) and ‘upbringing’ (Cro. ‘odgoj’) with ‘education’ (Cro. ‘edukacija’), while the term ‘educology’ was introduced to represent the science about education. Americanisation is visible through changes to the Croatian pedagogical tradition’s standard terminology, which generated doubts and discrepancies in both content guidelines and application. Regardless of the paradigm war, these and similar theoretical side-tracks do not ensure a sufficiently solid theoretical identity for pedagogy. This status is reflected in today’s study of pedagogy, which was designed according to principles of the Bologna process and the pedagogical profession, which is searching for space for practical action.