E2F

Abstract: Much has been written about the functions of the E2F transcription factor and the product of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene (pRB). These proteins have been described in terms that vary from ‘‘master regulators of cell cycle and differentiation’’ to ‘‘peripheral factors that lie outside the core cell cycle machinery.’’ Most often, pRB and E2F are described in short and simple terms as opposing molecules that control the G1to Sphase transition. There is an element of truth in each of these descriptions. E2Fand pRB-family proteins clearly play important roles in cell proliferation and differentiation. The extent to which they are master regulators or peripheral factors is a question of semantics, and these terms tell us more about the writer than the proteins. Perhaps the most important development in the E2F literature is the appreciation that E2F and pRB are not unique molecules with functions that can be defined in black and white terms. Instead, E2F and pRB represent families of related proteins that have diverse and occasionally contradictory activities. We now know a great deal about E2F complexes and pRB-family proteins and the emerging picture defies a one-line explanation. The fascinating variety of activities ascribed to various E2F complexes challenges us to place these into context and to find the right perspective. This review is presented into two sections. The first section summarizes the tremendous progress into the composition and properties of E2F and the many interactions that coordinately regulate E2F-dependent transcription. The rapid growth in the size of the E2F literature hides the fact that several fundamental questions have not been fully answered. Because of this, the second section of this review details five unresolved issues that have been highlighted by recent publications. It is impossible to cover all of the relevant E2F literature in a single review and readers are referred to reviews by Farnham (1995); Sardet et al. (1997); Helin (1998); and Yamasaki (1998) for a comprehensive survey.

Abstract: The product (pRb) of the retinoblastoma gene (RB-1) prevents S-phase entry during the cell cycle, and inactivation of this growth-suppressive function is presumed to result from pRb hyperphosphorylation during late G1 phase. Complexes of the cyclin-dependent kinase, cdk4, and each of three different D-type cyclins, assembled in insect Sf9 cells, phosphorylated a pRb fusion protein in vitro at sites identical to those phosphorylated in human T cells. Only D-type cyclins activated cdk4 enzyme activity, whereas cyclins A, B1, and E did not. When Sf9 cells were coinfected with baculovirus vectors encoding human pRb and murine D-type cyclins, cyclins D2 and D3, but not D1, bound pRb with high stoichiometry in intact cells. Introduction of a vector encoding cdk4, together with those expressing pRb and D-type cyclins, induced pRb hyperphosphorylation and dissociation of cyclins D2 and D3, whereas expression of a kinase-defective cdk4 mutant in lieu of the wild-type catalytic subunit yielded ternary complexes. The transcription factor E2F-1 also bound to pRb in insect cells, and coexpression of cyclin D-cdk4 complexes, but neither subunit alone, triggered pRb phosphorylation and prevented its interaction with E2F-1. The D-type cyclins may play dual roles as cdk4 regulatory subunits and as adaptor proteins that physically target active enzyme complexes to particular substrates.