Droseraceae

Abstract: Molecular support for the monophyly of Droseraceae and its phylogenetic relationships to other dicot families was investigated using parsimony analysis of nucleotide sequences of the large subunit of ribulose1 ,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL). Analysis of 100 species of plants including families of subclasses Rosidae, Hamamelidae, Dilleniidae, and Caryophyllidae (sensu Cronquist) placed monophyletic Droseraceae in the same clade as Caryophyllidae and Nepenthaceae (Dilleniidae). In a second analysis of 14 species of Droseraceae, 15 caryophyllids, one Nepenthaceae, and three Santalales, a single most-parsimonious tree was found in which Droseraceae are monophyletic, although the position of Drosophyllum as a member of Droseraceae is only weakly supported. The rbcL tree identified four major lineages within genus Drosera: 1) Dionaea; 2) the regia-clade that contains only Drosera regia; 3) the capensis-clade that contains the South African and temperate species outside of Australia; and 4) the peltata-clade that consists of principally Australian endemics. A separate analysis of 14 morphological and phytochemical characters is in general agreement with the rbcL tree except for the placement of Nepenthes, Drosophyllum, and Drosera burmanni. A combined analysis of both data sets places Drosophyllum in a clade with Triphyophyllum (Dioncophyllaceae).

Abstract: Molecular support for the monophyly of Droseraceae and its phylogenetic relationships to other dicot families was investigated using parsimony analysis of nucleotide sequences of the large subunit of ribulose1 ,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL). Analysis of 100 species of plants including families of subclasses Rosidae, Hamamelidae, Dilleniidae, and Caryophyllidae (sensu Cronquist) placed monophyletic Droseraceae in the same clade as Caryophyllidae and Nepenthaceae (Dilleniidae). In a second analysis of 14 species of Droseraceae, 15 caryophyllids, one Nepenthaceae, and three Santalales, a single most-parsimonious tree was found in which Droseraceae are monophyletic, although the position of Drosophyllum as a member of Droseraceae is only weakly supported. The rbcL tree identified four major lineages within genus Drosera: 1) Dionaea; 2) the regia-clade that contains only Drosera regia; 3) the capensis-clade that contains the South African and temperate species outside of Australia; and 4) the peltata-clade that consists of principally Australian endemics. A separate analysis of 14 morphological and phytochemical characters is in general agreement with the rbcL tree except for the placement of Nepenthes, Drosophyllum, and Drosera burmanni. A combined analysis of both data sets places Drosophyllum in a clade with Triphyophyllum (Dioncophyllaceae).

Abstract: Recent phylogenetic analyses based on single gene and combined data sets have substantially increased our knowledge of the phylogeny of Caryophyllales s.l., indicating that additional carnivorous families are related to this alliance. In earlier contributions towards a reassessment of inter- and infrafamilial relationships slowly evolving genes had been preferred for phylogenetic inference. The resulting tree topologies based on rbcL and 18S rDNA, however, were characterized by limited resolution, low internal support and topological incongruence. Therefore genomic regions evolving more rapidly have been used in subsequent studies. Comparative sequencing of the matK gene and the flanking trnK intron region as well as combined analyses based on plastid matK, atpB, rbcL, and nuclear 18S rDNA have effectively improved resolution and internal support. Tree topologies revealed Caryophyllales s.l. as monophyletic group and indicated a clear division into two sister clades, the “core” and the “non-core” Caryophyllales (with Rhabdodendraceae and Simmondsiaceae with unclear affinities). Contrary to the “core” group (with Asteropeiaceae and Physenaceae as successive sister groups), which corresponds largely to the previous circumscription of the order, the monophyly of “non-core” Caryophyllales comprising Polygonaceae, Plumbaginaceae, Frankeniaceae, and Tamaricaceae along with the carnivorous families Droseraceae, Nepenthaceae, Drosophyllaceae, Dioncophyllaceae, and Ancistrocladaceae are a recent discovery. Based on reliable tree topologies it is hypothesized that pitfall traps of Nepenthes and snap traps typical for Aldrovanda and Dionaea were derived from a common ancestor with adhesive flypaper traps. With exception of Triphyophyllum carnivory was secondarily lost in the remaining Dioncophyllaceae (Dioncophyllum, Habropetalum) and all taxa of Ancistrocladaceae.

Abstract: The snap-trap leaves of the aquatic waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda) resemble those of Venus' flytrap (Dionaea), its distribution and habit are reminiscent of bladderworts (Utricularia), but it shares many reproductive characters with sundews (Drosera). Moreover, Aldrovanda has never been included in molecular phylogenetic studies, so it has been unclear whether snap-traps evolved only once or more than once among angiosperms. Using sequences from nuclear 18S and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK genes, we show that Aldrovanda is sister to Dionaea, and this pair is sister to Drosera. Our results indicate that snap-traps are derived from flypaper-traps and have a common ancestry among flowering plants, despite the fact that this mechanism is used by both a terrestrial species and an aquatic one. Genetic and fossil evidence for the close relationship between these unique and threatened organisms indicate that carnivory evolved from a common ancestor within this caryophyllid clade at least 65 million years ago.