TL;DR: It is hypothesized that the high availability of homopteran honeydew provides a key resource for ant mosaics, where dominant ant colonies and species maintain mutually exclusive territories on trees.
Abstract: Ant-plant interactions in the canopy of a lowland Amazonian rainforest of the upper Orinoco, Venezuela, were studied using a modified commercial crane on rails (Surumoni project). Our observations show a strong correlation between plant sap exudates and both abundance of ants and co-occurrence of ant species in tree canopies. Two types of plant sap sources were compared: extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) and honeydew secretions by homopterans. EFNs were a frequent food source for ants on epiphytes (Philodendron spp., Araceae) and lianas (Dioclea, Fabaceae), but rare on canopy trees in the study area, whereas the majority of trees were host to aggregations of homopterans tended by honeydew-seeking ants (on 62% of the trees examined). These aggregations rarely occurred on epiphytes. Baited ant traps were installed on plants with EFNs and in the crowns of trees from three common genera, including trees with and without ant-tended homopterans: Goupia glabra (Celastraceae), Vochysia spp. (Vochysiaceae), and Xylopia spp. (Annonaceae). The number of ant workers per trap was significantly higher on plants offering one of the two plant sap sources than on trees without such resources. Extrafloral nectaries were used by a much broader spectrum of ant species and genera than honeydew, and co-occurrence of ant species (in traps) was significantly higher on plants bearing EFNs than on trees. Homopteran honeydew (Coccidae and Membracidae), on the other hand, was mostly monopolised by a single ant colony per tree. Homopteran-tending ants were generally among the most dominant ants in the canopy. The most prominent genera were Azteca, Dolichoderus (both Dolichoderinae), Cephalotes, Pheidole, Crematogaster (all Myrmicinae), and Ectatomma (Ponerinae). Potential preferences were recorded between ant and homopteran species, and also between ant-homopteran associations and tree genera. We hypothesize that the high availability of homopteran honeydew provides a key resource for ant mosaics, where dominant ant colonies and species maintain mutually exclusive territories on trees. In turn, we propose that for nourishment of numerous ants of lower competitive capacity, Philodendron and other sources of EFNs might be particularly important.
TL;DR: In this article, a novel dicarbonyl compound (C10H14O2) was extracted from D, acanthoclinea clarki (Wheeler), and D. myrmecodiae (Emery).
Abstract: Terpenoid constituents have been isolated from the following Dolichoderus and Iridomyrmex ants. Dolichodial, a novel dicarbonyl compound (C10H14O2), has been extracted from D, acanthoclinea clarki (Wheeler), and D. acanthoclinea dentata (Forel). It has also been obtained from I. myrmecodiae (Emery). The known compounds, methylheptenone and iridodial, have been isolated from I. nitidiceps (Andre). D. diceratoclinea scabridus (Roger) yields (i) methylheptenone and iridodial, or (ii) isoiridomyrmecin, or (iii) dolichodial, dependent on the ant colony. Such variations in the nature of the chemical secretion of different colonies of ants, which are taxonomically indistinguishable, have not previously been reported. Similarly, I. rufoniger (Lowne) yields (i) methylheptenone and iridodial, or (ii) dolichodial.
TL;DR: Two species of ants, Formica obscuripes Forel and Dolichoderus ( Hypoclinea ) taschenbergi (Mayr), attended species of Cinara, mainly C .
Abstract: Two species of ants, Formica obscuripes Forel and Dolichoderus (Hypoclinea) taschenbergi (Mayr), attended species of Cinara, mainly C. gracilis (Wilson) on Pinus banksiana Lamb., in the Sandilands Forest Reserve, Man. The aphids occurred only on trees near ant hills. Removing the aphids by spraying had no serious effect on the ants. Destruction of an ant colony was followed by the disappearance of the aphids. The trees benefited through removal of defoliating insects by the ants.
TL;DR: Prof. Auguste Forel was the first to describe such an occurrence and to designate it as parabiosis, to distinguish it from those peculiar forms of social symbiosis, called "compound nests " and " mixed colonies," among certain Nearctic and Palearctic species.
Abstract: The mutual hostility of ants belonging to colonies of different or even of the same species is so nearly universal, that it is surprising to find colonies belonging to different taxonomic subfamilies actually living in the same nest in a state of mutual toleration or even amity. Prof. Auguste Forel was the first to describe such an occurrence and to designate it as parabiosis, to distinguish it from those peculiar forms of social symbiosis, called "compound nests " and " mixed colonies," among certain Nearctic and Palearctic species. While on a trip to Colombia in i896 he made the following observations (i898): "I often observed, for the first time in the neighborhood of Santa Martha, two species of ants belonging to different genera and even to different subfamilies, a Dolichoderus and a Crenastogaster, both of a shining black color, the former much the larger and especially broader than the latter, and of a very different form, running very generally in common files, both over the ground and on the undergrowth. The files were very long and dense, so that the ants met and elbowed one another continually. " The two species were foraging on the bushes, the Cremastogaster seeking especially the plant-lice or scale insects, the Dolichoderus especially the juices of plants. Hence towards their terminations the files divided, each species proceeding to its own feeding ground. I finally succeeded in discovering on the trunk of a mango a large termite nest which had been appropriated by the two species of ants in question and was serving them as a habitation of a character hitherto unknown. The time for observation was unusually propitious, as each species had its sexual phases and its pupae in the nest. The latter was inhabited just as it had been abandoned by the termites, without any alterations or additions. In no part of it were the two species of ants actually mixed. Some of the corners were still occupied by the termites. " The chambers and galleries were nearly everywhere occupied either by the Cremastogaster with their females, males and pupae or by the Dolichoderus with their females, males and pupae. Each species, therefore, had its own separate menage, unlike the conditions seen in the mixed formicaries of our PolYergus and Formica, which carry on their households in common.