Digoxin

Abstract: Background Controlled clinical trials have shown that beta-blockers can produce hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in chronic heart failure, but the effect of these drugs on survival has not been determined. Methods We enrolled 1094 patients with chronic heart failure in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified program, in which patients were assigned to one of four treatment protocols on the basis of their exercise capacity. Within each of the four protocols patients with mild, moderate, or severe heart failure with left ventricular ejection fractions ≤0.35 were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 398) or the beta-blocker carvedilol (n = 696); background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitor remained constant. Patients were observed for the occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons during the following 6 months (12 months for the group with mild heart failure). Results The overall mortality rate was 7.8 percent in t...

Abstract: Background and Methods. To define better the efficacy of vasodilator therapy in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure, we compared the effects of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate with those of enalapril in 804 men receiving digoxin and diuretic therapy for heart failure. The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive 20 mg of enalapril daily or 300 mg of hydralazine plus 160 mg of isosorbide dinitrate daily. The latter regimen was identical to that used with a similar patient population in the effective-treatment arm of our previous Vasodilator—Heart Failure Trial. Results. Mortality after two years was significantly lower in the enalapril arm (18 percent) than in the hydralazine—isosorbide dinitrate arm (25 percent) (P = 0.016; reduction in mortality, 28.0 percent), and overall mortality tended to be lower (P = 0.08). The lower mortality in the enalapril arm was attributable to a reduction in the incidence of sudden death, and this beneficial effect was m...

Abstract: Background The role of cardiac glycosides in treating patients with chronic heart failure and normal sinus rhythm remains controversial. We studied the effect of digoxin on mortality and hospitalization in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.Methods In the main trial, patients with left ventricular ejection fractions of 0.45 or less were randomly assigned to digoxin (3397 patients) or placebo (3403 patients) in addition to diuretics and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (median dose of digoxin, 0.25 mg per day; average follow-up, 37 months). In an ancillary trial of patients with ejection fractions greater than 0.45, 492 patients were randomly assigned to digoxin and 496 to placebo.Results In the main trial, mortality was unaffected. There were 1181 deaths (34.8 percent) with digoxin and 1194 deaths (35.1 percent) with placebo (risk ratio when digoxin was compared with placebo, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.07; P = 0.80). In the digoxin group, there was a trend toward a decrease in the risk of death attributed to worsening heart failure (risk ratio, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.01; P = 0.06). There were 6 percent fewer hospitalizations overall in that group than in the placebo group, and fewer patients were hospitalized for worsening heart failure (26.8 percent vs. 34.7 percent; risk ratio, 0.72; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.79; P < 0.001). In the ancillary trial, the findings regarding the primary combined outcome of death or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure were consistent with the results of the main trial.Conclusions Digoxin did not reduce overall mortality, but it reduced the rate of hospitalization both overall and for worsening heart failure. These findings define more precisely the role of digoxin in the management of chronic heart failure. (C) 1997, Massachusetts Medical Society.

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of vasodilator therapy on mortality among patients with chronic congestive heart failure, we randomly assigned 642 men with impaired cardiac function and reduced exercise tolerance who were taking digoxin and a diuretic to receive additional double-blind treatment with placebo, prazosin (20 mg per day), or the combination of hydralazine (300 mg per day) and isosorbide dinitrate (160 mg per day). Follow-up averaged 2.3 years (range, 6 months to 5.7 years). Mortality over the entire follow-up period was lower in the group that received hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate than in the placebo group. This difference was of borderline statistical significance. For mortality by two years, a major end point specified in the protocol, the risk reduction among patients treated with both hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate was 34 percent (P less than 0.028). The cumulative mortality rates at two years were 25.6 percent in the hydralazine--isosorbide dinitrate group and 34.3 percent in the placebo group; at three years, the mortality rate was 36.2 percent versus 46.9 percent. The mortality-risk reduction in the group treated with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate was 36 percent by three years. The mortality in the prazosin group was similar to that in the placebo group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (measured sequentially) rose significantly at eight weeks and at one year in the group treated with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate but not in the placebo or prazosin groups. Our data suggest that the addition of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate to the therapeutic regimen of digoxin and diuretics in patients with chronic congestive heart failure can have a favorable effect on left ventricular function and mortality.