TL;DR: It is argued that there is enormous potential in using big data to study a variety of phenomena that remain difficult to observe, however, there are some recurring vulnerabilities that should be addressed.
Abstract: Social life increasingly occurs in digital environments and continues to be mediated by digital systems Big data represents the data being generated by the digitization of social life, which we break down into three domains: digital life, digital traces, and digitalized life We argue that there is enormous potential in using big data to study a variety of phenomena that remain difficult to observe However, there are some recurring vulnerabilities that should be addressed We also outline the role institutions must play in clarifying the ethical rules of the road Finally, we conclude by pointing to a few trends that are not yet common in research using big data but will play an increasing role in it Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Sociology Volume 43 is July 30, 2017 Please see http://wwwannualreviewsorg/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates
TL;DR: The authors discusses texts recommending digital detox and how these accentuate dilemmas of what it means to be authentically "authentic" in contemporary culture, and how they accentuate the desire for the authentic.
Abstract: A fascination for the authentic is pervasive in contemporary culture. This article discusses texts recommending digital detox and how these accentuate dilemmas of what it means to be authentically ...
TL;DR: In this paper, a digital life server is provided and a method is provided to determine if the data is stored at the remote server and also to provide the data to the authenticated user.
Abstract: In various embodiments, a digital life server is provided. In an embodiment, a method is provided. The method includes receiving at a remote server from an authenticated user a request for data. The method further includes determining if the data is stored at the remote server. The method also includes providing the data to the authenticated user.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify three contemporary normative responses to these complex issues: digital citizenship, digital rights and digital literacy, and explore the effectiveness of each in addressing the philosophical, ethical and practical issues raised by datafication, and the limitations of human agency.
Abstract: Using digital media is complicated. Invasions of privacy, increasing dataveillance, digital-by-default commercial and civic transactions and the erosion of the democratic sphere are just some of the complex issues in modern societies. Existential questions associated with digital life challenge the individual to come to terms with who they are, as well as their social interactions and realities. In this article, we identify three contemporary normative responses to these complex issues –digital citizenship, digital rights and digital literacy. These three terms capture epistemological and ontological frames that theorise and enact (both in policy and everyday social interactions) how individuals learn to live in digitally mediated societies. The article explores the effectiveness of each in addressing the philosophical, ethical and practical issues raised by datafication, and the limitations of human agency as an overarching goal within these responses. We examine how each response addresses challenges in policy, everyday social life and political rhetoric, tracing the fluctuating uses of these terms and their address to different stakeholders. The article concludes with a series of conceptual and practical ‘action points’ that might optimise these responses to the benefit of the individual and society.
TL;DR: The Internet of Us as mentioned in this paper explores the philosophical implications of the digital way of life and shows how our digital way-of-life makes us overvalue some ways of processing information over others, and thus risks distorting what it means to be human.
Abstract: With far-reaching implications, this urgent treatise promises to revolutionize our understanding of what it means to be human in the digital age. We used to say "seeing is believing"; now googling is believing. With 24/7 access to nearly all of the world's information at our fingertips, we no longer trek to the library or the encyclopedia shelf in search of answers. We just open our browsers, type in a few keywords and wait for the information to come to us. Indeed, the Internet has revolutionized the way we learn and know, as well as how we interact with each other. And yet this explosion of technological innovation has also produced a curious paradox: even as we know more, we seem to understand less. While a wealth of literature has been devoted to life with the Internet, the deep philosophical implications of this seismic shift have not been properly explored until now. Demonstrating that knowledge based on reason plays an essential role in society and that there is much more to knowing than just acquiring information, leading philosopher Michael Patrick Lynch shows how our digital way of life makes us overvalue some ways of processing information over others, and thus risks distorting what it means to be human. With far-reaching implications, Lynch's argument charts a path from Plato's cave to Shannon's mathematical theory of information to Google Glass, illustrating that technology itself isn't the problem, nor is it the solution. Instead, it will be the way in which we adapt our minds to these new tools that will ultimately decide whether or not the "Internet of Things"all those gadgets on our wrists, in our pockets and on our lapswill be a net gain for humanity. Along the way, Lynch uses a philosopher's lens to examine some of the most urgent issues facing digital life today, including how social media is revolutionizing the way we think about privacy; why a greater reliance on Wikipedia and Google doesn't necessarily make knowledge "more democratic"; and the perils of using "big data" alone to predict cultural trends. Promising to modernize our understanding of what it means to be human in the digital age, The Internet of Us builds on previous works by Nicholas Carr, James Gleick and Jaron Lanier to give us a necessary guide on how to navigate the philosophical quagmire that is the Information Age.