TL;DR: This protocol describes H&E staining of tissue and cell sections and discloses abundant structural information, with specific functional implications of hematoxylin staining.
Abstract: INTRODUCTIONHematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains have been used for at least a century and are still essential for recognizing various tissue types and the morphologic changes that form the basis of contemporary cancer diagnosis. The stain has been unchanged for many years because it works well with a variety of fixatives and displays a broad range of cytoplasmic, nuclear, and extracellular matrix features. Hematoxylin has a deep blue-purple color and stains nucleic acids by a complex, incompletely understood reaction. Eosin is pink and stains proteins nonspecifically. In a typical tissue, nuclei are stained blue, whereas the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix have varying degrees of pink staining. Well-fixed cells show considerable intranuclear detail. Nuclei show varying cell-type- and cancer-type-specific patterns of condensation of heterochromatin (hematoxylin staining) that are diagnostically very important. Nucleoli stain with eosin. If abundant polyribosomes are present, the cytoplasm will have a distinct blue cast. The Golgi zone can be tentatively identified by the absence of staining in a region next to the nucleus. Thus, the stain discloses abundant structural information, with specific functional implications. A limitation of hematoxylin staining is that it is incompatible with immunofluorescence. It is useful, however, to stain one serial paraffin section from a tissue in which immunofluorescence will be performed. Hematoxylin, generally without eosin, is useful as a counterstain for many immunohistochemical or hybridization procedures that use colorimetric substrates (such as alkaline phosphatase or peroxidase). This protocol describes H&E staining of tissue and cell sections.
TL;DR: Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.
Abstract: Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium, temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength) of UV-light influenced the differential staining. Exposure of blacklight of 10−5 M Hoechst 33528-stained BrdU-labeled chromosome specimens mounted in McIlvaine buffer (pH 8.0) at 50° C reproducibly allowed differential staining of sister chromatids within 15 min. On the other hand, Korenberg-Freedlender's method using no Hoechst 33258 was also UV-light-dependent. Thus, photolysis of BrdU-substituted DNA was considered the basic mechanism of the Giemsa methods where the photosensitive Hoechst 33258 played a role as a sensitizer.
TL;DR: Blastocyst staining patterns indicate that this modified technique represents a simple and reliable alternative to current bichromatic blastocystStaining techniques for the differential assessment of cell numbers and may be useful for the assessment of blastocysts derived from in-vitro maturation, novel culture systems and advanced reproductive technologies such as cloning.
Abstract: Histological staining and counting of blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) cells differentially with chromatin-specific dyes is a more accurate indicator of cultured blastocyst quality and normality than total cell number assessment. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of a simplified method of chemically-defined differential blastocyst staining. The TE of cultured mouse and bovine blastocysts of different developmental stages was stained when blastocysts were treated with a permeabilizing solution containing the ionic detergent Triton X-100 and the fluorochrome propidium iodide. Blastocysts were then incubated in a second solution containing 100% ethanol (for fixation) and the secondary fluorochrome bisbenzimide. Fixed and stained whole blastocysts were mounted and assessed for cell number using ultraviolet fluorescent microscopy. Using this method, in-vitro cultured mouse blastocysts (day 4.5) were shown to have an ICM:TE ratio of 1:2.63 with an average total cell count of 75.3 ± 3. While day 7 and 8 in-vitro produced bovine blastocysts were shown to have an ICM:TE ratio of 1:3.42 and 1:3.36 with an average total cell count of 151.3 ± 5.48 and 217.8 ± 8.75 respectively. Blastocyst staining patterns indicate that this modified technique represents a simple and reliable alternative to current bichromatic blastocyst staining techniques for the differential assessment of cell numbers and may be useful for the assessment of blastocysts derived from in-vitro maturation, novel culture systems and advanced reproductive technologies such as cloning.
TL;DR: The Gram stain differentiates bacteria into two fundamental varieties of cells: bacteria that retain the initial crystal violet stain (purple) and those that are decolorized and stain red with carbol fuchsin (or safranin) are said to be "gram-negative."
Abstract: The Gram stain differentiates bacteria into two fundamental varieties of cells. Bacteria that retain the initial crystal violet stain (purple) are said to be "gram-positive," whereas those that are decolorized and stain red with carbol fuchsin (or safranin) are said to be "gram-negative." This staining response is based on the chemical and structural makeup of the cell walls of both varieties of bacteria. Gram-positives have a thick, relatively impermeable wall that resists decolorization and is composed of peptidoglycan and secondary polymers. Gram-negatives have a thin peptidoglycan layer plus an overlying lipid-protein bilayer known as the outer membrane, which can be disrupted by decolorization. Some bacteria have walls of intermediate structure and, although they are officially classified as gram-positives because of their linage, they stain in a variable manner. One prokaryote domain, the Archaea, have such variability of wall structure that the Gram stain is not a useful differentiating tool.
TL;DR: In this article, an improved version of the Alexander's stain was proposed, which avoids the use of a regulated chemical chloral hydrate and two extremely toxic chemicals mercuric chloride and phenol, and requires a much shorter time period for sample preparation and staining.
Abstract: The ability to use chemical staining to discriminate aborted from non-aborted pollen grains has well-known practical applications in agriculture. A commonly used technique for assessing pollen vitality, Alexander’s stain, uses chloral hydrate, phenol and mercuric chloride, all of which are highly toxic. We describe here an improved pollen staining technique that avoids the use of a regulated chemical chloral hydrate and two extremely toxic chemicals mercuric chloride and phenol, and requires a much shorter time period for sample preparation and staining. This simplified method is very useful for field studies without high-end equipments such as fluorescence microscopes. Samples can be collected and fixed in the fields and examined in a simple laboratory that has light microscopes.