About: Dichotomy is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 99 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1870 citations. The topic is also known as: duality.
TL;DR: A conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors are discussed in this article . But, as mentioned before, the proposed framework does not consider the role of functional microglia in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases.
TL;DR: The authors examines three interconnected themes in political science: the nuts and bolts of government, the complex and evolving relationship between politics and administration, and continuity and change in government, and empirically demonstrates how government bodies at different levels of governance are driven by pragmatism characterised by the coexistence of multiple decision-making premises.
Abstract: This volume examines three interconnected themes in political science: the nuts and bolts of government, the complex and evolving relationship between politics and administration, and continuity and change in government. Government ministries and agencies are vital components of the executive branch of government that play fundamental roles in the democratic governing of modern societies. Contemporary public administration is conventionally portrayed as being based on a series of dichotomies: politics versus administration, coordination versus fragmentation, integration versus disintegration, trust versus distrust, etc. As an alternative, this volume, which is composed of a series of case studies from the Nordics and beyond, conceptualises and empirically demonstrates how government bodies at different levels of governance are driven by pragmatism characterised by the co-existence of multiple decision-making premises. To account for the composite aspect of government, this volume illustrates how institutional and organisational factors can structure elements in the policymaking process and how these elements are powerful tools available to purposeful design.
TL;DR: Empirically based pluralism provides a rigorous but dappled view of the etiology of psychiatric illness, based not on how the world should be but how the difference-makers for psychiatric illness are in fact distributed.
Abstract: The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: replacing the organic–functional/hardware–software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism
TL;DR: In this paper, a more dynamic model of human-nature relations is presented which connects humans and information in the participatory process, and the authors find that cooperation between actors can provide distinct but complementary and mutually rewarding outcomes.
Abstract: Analyses of participation usually assume a dichotomy between ‘instrumental’ and ‘transformative’ approaches. However, this study of voluntary biological monitoring experiences and outcomes finds that they cannot be fitted into such a dichotomy. They can enhance the information base for environmental management; change participants through education about scientific practice and ecological change; lead to changes in life direction or group organisation; and influence decision-makers. Personal transformation can take place within a conventionally top-down context. Conversely, grassroots data collection can shore up the status quo and protect local interests. Partnerships between actors can provide distinct but complementary and mutually rewarding outcomes. Power is not located in a data-consuming centre, and data are not meaningless materials that leave the collector unmoved. A more dynamic model of human-nature relations is presented which connects humans and information in the participatory process.
TL;DR: The book explores the relational nature of civil society, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various actors and organizations. It challenges rigid dichotomies and introduces a framework for understanding the diverse modes of coordination within civil society.
Abstract: Civil society is frequently conceived as a field of multiple organizations, committed to highly diverse causes and interests. When studied empirically, however, its properties are often reduced to the sum of the traits and attitudes of the individuals or groups that are populating it. This book shows how to move from an 'aggregative' to a relational view of civil society. Drawing upon field work on citizens' organizations in two British cities, this book combines network analysis and social movement theories to show how to represent civil society as a system of relations between multiple actors. 'Modes of coordination' enables us to identify different logics of collective action within the same local settings. The book exposes the weakness of rigid dichotomies, separating the voluntary sector from social movements, 'civic' activism oriented to service delivery from 'un-civic' protest, grassroots activism external to institutions from formal, professionalized organizations integrated within the 'system'.