TL;DR: The links between canalization, plasticity and developmental stability, the three major processes involved in the control of phenotypic variability, are clarified.
Abstract: The relationship between genotype and phenotype is not one to one. This statement is central to our understanding of how natural selection shapes phenotypic evolution. Here, we clarify the links between canalization, plasticity and developmental stability, the three major processes involved in the control of phenotypic variability. We present a short historical review, including the original definitions of these concepts, and then summarize their current meaning and use, highlighting possible sources of confusion. Some of the perspectives allowed by a more synthetic conceptual framework are presented, in the light of the recent advances in molecular and developmental genetics.
TL;DR: Old and new methods of measuring fluctuating asymmetry are reviewed, including measures of dispersion, landmark methods for shape asymmetry, and continuous symmetry measures, and attempts to explain conflicting results.
Abstract: Fluctuating asymmetry consists of random deviations from perfect symmetry in populations of organisms. It is a measure of developmental noise, which reflects a population’s average state of adaptation and coadaptation. Moreover, it increases under both environmental and genetic stress, though responses are often inconsistent. Researchers base studies of fluctuating asymmetry upon deviations from bilateral, radial, rotational, dihedral, translational, helical, and fractal symmetries. Here, we review old and new methods of measuring fluctuating asymmetry, including measures of dispersion, landmark methods for shape asymmetry, and continuous symmetry measures. We also review the theory, developmental origins, and applications of fluctuating asymmetry, and attempt to explain conflicting results. In the process, we present examples from the literature, and from our own research at “Evolution Canyon” and elsewhere.
TL;DR: An illustrative list is presented of human and animal studies which each point to the existence of a third source, in addition to genetic and environmental factors, underlying phenotypic differences in development.
Abstract: An illustrative list is presented of human and animal studies which each point to the existence of a third source, in addition to genetic and environmental factors, underlying phenotypic differences in development. It is argued that this third source may consist of nonlinear epigenetic processes that can create variability at all phenotypical-somatic and behavioral-levels. In a quantitative genetic analysis with human subjects, these processes are confounded with within-family environmental influences. A preliminary model to quantify these influences is introduced.
TL;DR: A measure of developmental instability is introduced, the residual variance, obtainable from either a major axis regression, which is equivalent to a principal component analysis on l and r, or a general structural model, and examples of developmental stability estimated from directionally asymmetric and antisymmetric traits are presented.
Abstract: Three widely used methods of estimating fluctuating asymmetry may yield serious overestimates if directional asymmetry is present. When two sides of a bilateral trait grow at different rates, then the asymmetry variance (Var[ l−r ]) increases with size, even when developmental noise is nil. But the residual variance around a population's mean developmental trajectory is invariant with respect to size. Thus, it can be used as a measure of developmental instability. We introduce a measure of developmental instability, the residual variance ( s 2 δ ), obtainable from either a major axis regression, which is equivalent to a principal component analysis on l and r , or a general structural model. This residual variance can be estimated from directionally asymmetric or even antisymmetric traits. We present examples of developmental instability estimated from directionally asymmetric mandibles (house mouse) and leaves (soybean), and antisymmetric claws (fiddler crab).
TL;DR: Non-directional asymmetry of paired organs is attributed to developmental ‘noise’ and the action of polygenes with a quasi-continuous distribution is consistent with this observation.
Abstract: Non-directional asymmetry of paired organs is attributed to developmental ‘noise’. The level of asymmetry is inversely correlated to the degree of developmental stability. Children affected with familial cleft lip ± cleft palate have an increased asymmetry of their dermatoglyphics and molar teeth. The action of polygenes with a quasi-continuous distribution is consistent with this observation.