TL;DR: The following review of attempts to improve the mechanical properties of denture base material takes account of papers published during the last 30 years.
Abstract: The material most commonly used for the fabrication of complete dentures is poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). This material is not ideal in every respect and it is the combination of virtues rather than one single desirable property that accounts for its popularity and usage. Despite its popularity in satisfying aesthetic demands it is still far from ideal in fulfilling the mechanical requirements of a prosthesis. The fracture of dentures may be due to the mechanical properties of the acrylic resin or may be due to a multiplicity of factors leading to failure of the denture base material. Generally, there are three routes which have been investigated to improve the impact properties of PMMA: the search for, or development of, an alternative material to PMMA; the chemical modification of PMMA such as by the addition of a rubber graft copolymer; and the reinforcement of PMMA with other materials such as carbon fibres, glass fibres and ultra-high modulus polyethylene. The following review of attempts to improve the mechanical properties of denture base material takes account of papers published during the last 30 years.
TL;DR: A classification for partially edentulous maxillectomy dental arches is proposed based on the frequency of occurrence of maxillary defects in a population of 123 patients.
Abstract: A classification for partially edentulous maxillectomy dental arches is proposed. This classification is based on the frequency of occurrence of maxillary defects in a population of 123 patients.
TL;DR: The CAD-CAM fabrication process was the most accurate and reproducible denture fabrication technique when compared with pack and press, pour, injection, and injection denture base processing techniques.
Abstract: Statement of problem Currently no data comparing the denture base adaptation of CAD-CAM and conventional denture processing techniques have been reported. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the denture base adaptation of pack and press, pour, injection, and CAD-CAM techniques for fabricating dentures to determine which process produces the most accurate and reproducible adaptation. Material and methods A definitive cast was duplicated to create 40 gypsum casts that were laser scanned before any fabrication procedures were initiated. A master denture was made using the CAD-CAM process and was then used to create a putty mold for the fabrication of 30 standardized wax festooned dentures, 10 for each of the conventional processing techniques (pack and press, pour, injection). Scan files from 10 casts were sent to Global Dental Science, LLC for fabrication of the CAD-CAM test specimens. After specimens for each of the 4 techniques had been fabricated, they were hydrated for 24 hours and the intaglio surface laser scanned. The scan file of each denture was superimposed on the scan file of the corresponding preprocessing cast using surface matching software. Measurements were made at 60 locations, providing evaluation of fit discrepancies at the following areas: apex of the denture border, 6 mm from the denture border, crest of the ridge, palate, and posterior palatal seal. The use of median and interquartile range was used to assess accuracy and reproducibility. The Levine and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences between processing techniques at the 5 specified locations (α=.05). Results The ranking of results based on median and interquartile range determined that the accuracy and reproducibility of the CAD-CAM technique was more consistently localized around zero at 3 of the 5 locations. Therefore, the CAD-CAM technique showed the best combination of accuracy and reproducibility among the tested fabrication techniques. The pack and press technique was more accurate at 2 of the 5 locations; however, its interquartile range (reproducibility) was the greatest of the 4 tested processing techniques. The pour technique was the most reproducible at 2 of the 5 locations; however, its accuracy was the lowest of the tested techniques. Conclusions The CAD-CAM fabrication process was the most accurate and reproducible denture fabrication technique when compared with pack and press, pour, and injection denture base processing techniques.
TL;DR: A prototype 3-D tooth arrangement program is described in this article that serves as an example of the type of program than can be used to arrange prosthetic teeth virtually as part of the overall CAD/CAM fabrication of complete dentures.
Abstract: The clinical impression procedures described in this article provide a method of recording the morphology of the intaglio and cameo surfaces of complete denture bases and also identify muscular and phonetic locations for the prosthetic teeth. When the CAD/CAM technology for fabricating complete dentures becomes commercially available, it will be possible to scan the denture base morphology and tooth positions recorded with this technique and import those data into a virtual tooth arrangement program where teeth can be articulated and then export the data to a milling device for the fabrication of the complete dentures. A prototype 3-D tooth arrangement program is described in this article that serves as an example of the type of program than can be used to arrange prosthetic teeth virtually as part of the overall CAD/CAM fabrication of complete dentures.