About: Deep inguinal ring is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 148 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1204 citations. The topic is also known as: internal inguinal ring.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that PPV is an etiologic factor and a risk factor for acquiring an indirect inguinal hernia in adults and a significant correlation between age and the prevalence of PPV was observed.
Abstract: Background Inguinal hernias are a common entity with nearly 31,000 repairs annually in The Netherlands and over 800,000 in the USA. The aim of the present study is to determine whether a laparoscopically diagnosed patent processus vaginalis (PPV) is a risk factor for the development of groin hernia. Methods The study population was originally composed of 599 consecutive cases (189 male, 32%) of laparoscopic transperitoneal surgery for different indications performed in 4 teaching hospitals in The Netherlands between November 1998 and February 2002. During laparoscopy, the deep inguinal ring was inspected bilaterally. The PPV group was compared with the obliterative processus vaginalis (OPV) group. Results After a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, the studied population consisted of 337 cases (94 male, 28%). In this study 12% of the studied population appeared to have PPV in adult life. The percentage PPV of our study group is much higher than the percentage of hernia repairs performed in the Dutch population. A greater proportion (12%) of hernia repairs in the PPV group was found as compared with the OPV group (3%). The chance of developing an inguinal hernia within 5.3 years is four times higher in the group with PPV. No significant correlation between age and the prevalence of PPV was observed. Conclusion This study demonstrates that PPV is an etiologic factor and a risk factor for acquiring an indirect inguinal hernia in adults.
TL;DR: Results suggest that recurrence occurs most often because of failure to fully expose the deep inguinal ring and/or to adequately spread the mesh inferiorly and laterally.
Abstract: Background: The totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is increasingly favoured for inguinal hernia repair. The learning curve is slow with high, early recurrence rates but the exact cause of recurrence is unknown. Objective: To determine the reasons for recurrence, identify the critical operative steps and examine the influence of surgical experience and training on results. Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing TEP between 1993 and 2004 were included. Patients requiring re-operation for recurrence were identified and examined in detail. Results: Eight surgical teams performed 1682 TEP repairs. Fifty five hernias recurred (3.27%) with a median follow-up of seven years (range 1–11 years). In six recurrences, the first repair was itself for recurrence and in 24, the initial repair was bilateral. The initial hernia was direct in 26 and indirect in 29 patients. These distributions were similar to a control sample. At re-operation, indirect recurrence was more common with 18 direct, and 37 indirect cases (P=0.020). At re-operation, when the original mesh could be identified (18 repairs), it appeared to have moved superiorly in 13 cases. Typically, recurrence occurred in 10% of a surgeon's first 20 cases, 4% of the next 60 cases and falling to below 2% thereafter. Conclusion: TEP repairs have a tendency for indirect recurrence even after direct repair. Meshes tend to migrate superiorly. Results suggest that recurrence occurs most often because of failure to fully expose the deep inguinal ring and/or to adequately spread the mesh inferiorly and laterally. We recommend particular attention be paid to these technical aspects. Acceptable results are obtainable after an experience of 20 cases but further improvement in results occurs as experience reaches 80 operations. With a large number of consultants having little or no experience in TEP surgery, there is an urgent need for ‘hands-on' training courses so that all patients have access to TEP, particularly those with bilateral or recurrent inguinal herniae
TL;DR: The results of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are important for discussion as operative methods differ from that of herniotomy and longer term prospective data collection is needed to compare these methods of operative hernia management.
Abstract: Open herniotomy with or without hernioscopy has been performed in our unit for a decade. Since 2005 the laparoscopic repair was also introduced. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare detection rates for direct visualization of the contralateral deep inguinal ring via the known sac using a 70° scope and via umbilical 30° laparoscopy and (2) to compare operative timings, metachronous and recurrence rates for the three different management pathways for inguinal hernia. A retrospective case note review was carried out over a 29 month period since the introduction of the laparoscopic hernia repair. All patients with inguinal hernia were identified from the work load of six surgeons encompassing the three methods of hernia management. Case notes were retrieved and the data analyzed using SPSS v.17. A total of 308 patients had 326 hernias performed. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 1 year (median 8 months). The male–female ratio was 4:1. Of the patients, 12% were neonates; 299 children presented with unilateral hernia. Of those, 164 (55%) children had open herniotomy without contralateral inspection, and 5 (3%) had metachronous hernia; 77 (26%) children had an open herniotomy with 70° hernioscopy; 2 (3%) children, who were considered to have closed contralateral deep inguinal ring during hernioscopy, had metachronous hernia, and 58 (19%) children had a laparoscopic hernia repair and none of them had metachronous hernia. Detection of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring for 70° hernioscopy and 30° laparoscopy was 10 (13%) and 16 (28%), respectively (P = 0.0465). Operative timing was significantly longer for laparoscopic repair (P ≤ 0.0001). During the study period there were 11 recurrences; 9 (5%) in the open only group and 2 (3%) in the laparoscopic group. The results of the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are important for discussion as operative methods differ from that of herniotomy. The detection rate of contralateral patent deep inguinal ring appears to be higher for direct visualization via umbilical 30° laparoscopy versus 70° scope via the hernia sac. Whilst laparoscopy offers potential advantage of improved visualization, longer term prospective data collection is needed to compare these methods of operative hernia management.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the inguinal canal ‘lipoma’ is a common feature in an adult male population and may be of sufficient size to cause clinical misdiagnosis.
TL;DR: An anatomical study allowed, after evisceration, dissection of the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches, particularly those supplying the inguinofemoral region: iliohypogastric and ilio-inguinal nerves, the genit ofemoral nerve, the femoral nerve and the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh.
Abstract: Laparoscopic techniques currently constitute an alternative proposed for the repair of hernias of the inguinofemoral region. Nerve injuries have led some teams to recommend technical principles based on the anatomical relations of these nerves with the subperitoneal fascia transversalis and inguinal fossae. An anatomical study consisting of dissection of nonembalmed cadavres, allowed, after evisceration, dissection of the lumbar plexus and its terminal branches, particularly those supplying the inguinofemoral region: iliohypogastric and ilio-inguinal nerves, the genitofemoral nerve, the femoral nerve and the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh. Via transperitoneal laparoscopy, the posterior surface of the anterior abdominal wall is centered on the deep inguinal ring, containing testicular vessels and the vas deferens. This deep inguinal ring receives the genitofemoral nerve. Medially, the anterior parietal peritoneum describes three folds formed by the outline of the epigastric artery, umbilical artery and urachus on the midline. The outline of Hesselbach's ligament separates the deep inguinal ring from Hesselbach's triangle, the zone of weakness of direct inguinal hernia. The iliac psoas muscle pass laterally underneath the inguinal ligament, while the external iliac vessels, subsequently becoming the femoral vessels, are located medially. Pectineal ligament lies on the posterior surface of the femoral ring between the umbilical artery and the epigastric artery. Installation of an abdominal wall prosthesis, either transperitoneally or retroperitoneally, must be centered on the deep inguinal ring, and its solid sutures are located medially to the pectineal ligament and anterior abdominal wall. On the other hand, the nerves at risk of being damaged are situated laterally: the ilio-inguinal and ilio-hypogastric nerves in the plane between external oblique and internal oblique above the anterior superior iliac spine, lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh under the inguinal ligament close to the anterior superior iliac spine, genitofemoral nerve with the spermatic cord in the deep inguinal ring and femoral nerve underneath the inguinal ligament with the psoas muscle lateral to the external iliac artery. No stapling must be performed under the plane of the inguinal ligament to avoid damage to the femoral vessels and lateral to the deep inguinal ring to avoid nerve damage.