TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess the process of rural land registration in Ghana and its outcomes for poor and marginalised groups and show that very little rural land has actually been affected by this registration process.
Abstract: Assesses the process of rural land registration in Ghana and its outcomes for poor and marginalised groups.In Ghana, deeds registration has been in place since colonial times, and enables right holders to record their land transactions. However, very little rural land has actually been affected by this registration process. The research shows a general lack of awareness of the registration process among the majority of cash and food crop farmers. High monetary and transaction costs and a long and cumbersome process also constrain use of deeds registration. As a result, while farmers in both Western and Eastern Regions increasingly make use of written documents to secure their transactions, very few bother to register those documents with the deeds registry.On the other hand, deeds registration is commonly used by agribusiness, and by mining and timber companies acquiring interests in land. In other words, while the deeds registration system seems to cater for the needs of medium to large-scale enterprises, it does not respond to the needs of small holders. The ongoing land administration reform programme needs to address these issues in order to establish institutions and processes that secure the land rights of poorer and more vulnerable groups.This report forms part of a series of seven papers based on a research programme entitled “Securing Land Rights in Africa: Can land registration serve the poor?” led by IIED.
TL;DR: In this article, a quality performance measurement model is proposed to analyze quality performance in land administration work processes, based on below expected quality results obtained at one of the sites, a root cause analysis was conducted to establish recurring and underlying causal factors upon which quality improvement strategies can be built on.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyze the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two systems of registration and suggest that the eventual ascendancy of title registration was due less to any inherent superiority than to external factors.
Abstract: A system of registration of title to land was first introduced int England by the Land Transfer Act 1862. Many commentators have since charted its development and have described the struggle between those espousing title registration and those advocating a reformed system of unregistered conveyancing. There has, however, been little discussion of an alternative which was strongly advocated in the nineteenth century; a general register of deeds, rather than title. The article explains the difference between the two systems and describes the various proposals for the establishment of a deeds register. It then analyses the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two systems of registration and suggests that the eventual ascendancy of title registration was due less to any inherent superiority than to external factors.
TL;DR: Sri Lanka has two types of cadastral system operating in the country and is in the process of migrating from deeds registration to titles registration as discussed by the authors, however, the deeds system has several drawbacks while the titles system meets unexpected difficulties.
Abstract: Sri Lanka has two types of cadastral system operating in the country and is in the process of cadastral system migration from deeds registration to titles registration. The deeds system, which was introduced in 1863, is well established, and the titles registration system, the introduction of which is ongoing, was initiated in 1998. Expectedly, the deeds system has several drawbacks, while the titles system meets unexpected difficulties. The purpose of this paper is to give an overview and a comparative analysis of both systems, thereby suggesting options for improvement.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the use of cell-phone technology for obtaining information about off-register transfers in land as are commonly undertaken by the urban poor in South Africa.
Abstract: This article investigates the concept of using cell-phone technology for obtaining information about unofficial (off-register) transfers in land as are commonly undertaken by the urban poor in South Africa. Since the introduction of social housing programmes in South Africa after the democratic elections in 1994, mass land distribution and housing projects have been undertaken. Formal transfer of these properties has been discouraged by policy (such as a moratorium on transfers for a period of years), and the inaccessibility of land professionals and formal processes to the poor. From the disuse of formal transfer mechanisms one can conclude that these fail, at least in part, to meet the needs of this segment of society. Cell- (mobile) phone technology penetrates urban poverty more than other interactive technologies such as the internet, largely due to the lack of access to computers and the 'digital divide'. The aim of this article is exploratory. It investigates the potential use of cell-phone technology as a means to inform authorities that a transfer of property has taken place informally or semi-formally. Such information could pave the way for a process of formal registration and hence aid the upkeep of the deeds registration system. Research into the potential use of the cell-phone as an information and communication technology (ICT) tool of land administration, particularly in the developing world, is undertaken. It is envisaged that a more detailed investigation will follow, which will include an analysis of organisational and legislative capacity. Further study in which the use of cell-phone technology in land administration is tested, taking into consideration structural/organisational factors as well as socio-economic and cultural factors and motivating factors for use, may be required.