Decortication

Abstract: We report a prospective multi-centre study of the clinical course and hospital management of thoracic empyema in 119 patients (mean age 54.8). The commonest presenting symptom was malaise (75%), 55% were febrile; 31% were previously well with no predisposing condition. Initial treatments were antibiotics alone (5), needle aspirations (46), intercostal tube drainage (61), rib resection (3) and decortication (4). Overall, intercostal drainage was used in 77 patients (16 failed aspirations), surgical rib resection in 24 (1 failed aspirations, 20 failed drainage), and surgical decortication in 28 (6 failed aspirations, 17 failed drainage). Only 4 patients received intrapleural fibrinolytic agents. Aspiration and drainage were likely to fail if the empyema was > 40% of the hemithorax. Median time from treatment start to discharge was: aspirations, 26 days; drainage, 23 days; resection 11 days; decortication, 12 days. Overall 21 patients died (12 with empyema as the major cause); two had been surgically treated. Mortality correlated with age, diabetes, heart failure, and low serum albumin at admission. Infecting organisms, identified in 109 patients (92%) included anaerobes (37), Str. melleri (36), and Str. pneumoniae (28). Six months after discharge, all but six survivors had regained their previous health.

Abstract: A pleural effusion is an excessive accumulation of fluid in the pleural space. It can pose a diagnostic dilemma to the treating physician because it may be related to disorders of the lung or pleura, or to a systemic disorder. Patients most commonly present with dyspnea, initially on exertion, predominantly dry cough, and pleuritic chest pain. To treat pleural effusion appropriately, it is important to determine its etiology. However, the etiology of pleural effusion remains unclear in nearly 20% of cases. Thoracocentesis should be performed for new and unexplained pleural effusions. Laboratory testing helps to distinguish pleural fluid transudate from an exudate. The diagnostic evaluation of pleural effusion includes chemical and microbiological studies, as well as cytological analysis, which can provide further information about the etiology of the disease process. Immunohistochemistry provides increased diagnostic accuracy. Transudative effusions are usually managed by treating the underlying medical disorder. However, a large, refractory pleural effusion, whether a transudate or exudate, must be drained to provide symptomatic relief. Management of exudative effusion depends on the underlying etiology of the effusion. Malignant effusions are usually drained to palliate symptoms and may require pleurodesis to prevent recurrence. Pleural biopsy is recommended for evaluation and exclusion of various etiologies, such as tuberculosis or malignant disease. Percutaneous closed pleural biopsy is easiest to perform, the least expensive, with minimal complications, and should be used routinely. Empyemas need to be treated with appropriate antibiotics and intercostal drainage. Surgery may be needed in selected cases where drainage procedure fails to produce improvement or to restore lung function and for closure of bronchopleural fistula.

Abstract: From 1965 to 1985, 262 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were treated with cytostatics only; radiotherapy (RT); RT and cytostatics; or decortication plus RT plus cytostatics. The median survival (MS) from diagnosis was 9.6 months. This was similar for all comparable treatment groups. In a univariate analysis, significant favorable prognostic factors were good performance status (PS), duration of symptoms greater than 6 months at the time of diagnosis, early stage of disease, white race, and female sex. In a multivariate analysis, PS, race, duration of symptoms, and stage were of significance for a favorable prognosis. Age, pain as first symptom, histologic subtype, and RT dose were not of prognosis significance in this study. The stepwise addition of treatment modalities did not increase survival, which remained the same as that reported for untreated patients. Therefore, phase II trials of new agents offer the only hope for advance in the treatment of this disease.