TL;DR: The intersection points of the diagonals (IPD) problem as mentioned in this paper is a classic example of an angle-chasing problem in geometry and has been shown to be NP-hard.
Abstract: This geometry problem which is the major focus of the talk today dates back to at least 1922, when it appeared in the Mathematical Gazette, Volume 11, p. 173. It appears to be an easy problem, but it is deceivingly difficult. I first saw the problem in the late 1960’s when my go teacher at the time gave it to me. I worked for a long time on the problem. However, I persisted in treating it as an elementary angle-chasing problem and did not solve it. A few years later the problem surfaced in a talk for high school students by Bill Leonard from California State College in Fullerton. As soon as he showed the problem on the screen, I covered my ears and put my head down, because I did not want to hear the solution. Nevertheless, I did not manage to solve the problem and finally when I encountered it in Geometry Revisited [1] by Coxeter and Greitzer, I read the solution one line at a time, trying to complete the proof. It was still difficult for me, since I was teaching Junior High School at the time and had not studied any geometry since high school. I then found the problem in some books I ordered for my classes: Trigonometric Novelties [10] and One Hundred Mathematical Curiosities [9]. Both were written by William Ransom in the 1950’s. I had not even considered trying to prove it using trigonometry. Of course there were no calculators in the early 1970’s selling for less than $200 that had trigonometric function keys . The Mathematical Association of America was now publishing a new series of books, the Dolciani Mathematical Expositions. The second volume, Mathematical Gems II [3] by Ross Honsberger, had a section entitled “Four Minor Gems from Geometry”. In this section, a 1951 proof by S.T. Thompson was presented based on intersecting diagonals of a regular 18-gon. Also during this period, a problem with 60◦ and 70◦ angles instead of 60◦ and 50◦ angles surfaced in the 1976 Carleton University Mathematics Competition for high school students. It was widely discussed in Crux Mathematicorum [2] with a call for non-trigonometric solutions. Many were forthcoming in the months that followed. In the May-June 1994 issue of Quantum there appeared a very interesting article entitled “ Nine Solutions to One Problem” [5] by Constantine Knop. This talk will be a discussion of these solutions. In 1997, an article in Mathematical Horizons [7] contained an article entitled “A Better Angle From Outside” by Andy Liu which discusses several problems that can be solved with the key idea used in the sixth proof in Knop’s article. In 2000, Essays on Numbers and Figures [8] by V.V. Prasolov became Volume 16 in the American Mathematical Society series Mathematical World. The essay in this volume, “Intersection Points of the Diagonals
TL;DR: Klamkin's problems in Crux Mathematicorum as discussed by the authors were the first to be considered in the Klamkin Tribute Problem (KTP) 2005. But they were not considered in this paper.
Abstract: Preface Introduction Part I. Problems: 1. Quickies 2. Klamkin's problems in Crux Mathematicorum 3. The Klamkin tribute problems 2005 Part II. Solutions: 4. Quickies 5. Klamkin's problems in Crux Mathematicorum 6. The Klamkin tribute problems 2005.
TL;DR: Murty as mentioned in this paper has been a frequent problem solver and poser for the American Mathematical Monthly, the College Mathematics Journal, and Crux Mathematicorum, and has served on the editorial board of the College Mathematical Journal.
Abstract: Vedula N. Murty, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics and Statistics at Penn State University, has spent his adult life coming to and going from America. He has studied in both India and the United States, and has worked professionally in these countries and also in Indonesia. His employers have included the Central Statistical Office of India, the United Nations, and the Pennsylvania State University. He was elected to the International Statistical Institute in 1985 and received the George Polya Award of the Mathematical Association of America in 1983, in recognition of his article (co-authored with Warren Page), "Nearness Relations Among Measures of Central Tendency," in the Two-Year College Mathematics Journal Working in mathematics as well as statistics, he has been a frequent problem solver and poser for the American Mathematical Monthly, the College Mathematics Journal, and Crux Mathematicorum, and has served on the editorial board of the College Mathematics Journal.
TL;DR: The efforts to efficiently add functionality to a digital version of two recent mathematics books, namely the CD-version of two volumes by Jonathan Borwein, David Bailey (and Roland Girgensohn for the latter) on Experimental Mathematics are described.
Abstract: We describe our efforts to efficiently add functionality to a digital version of two recent mathematics books, namely the CD-version of two volumes by Jonathan Borwein, David Bailey (and Roland Girgensohn for the latter) on Experimental Mathematics. In particular, we demonstrate how structuring the source text for these volumes to build on existing search and hyperlinking functionality within Adobe Acrobat has resulted in a digital text that allows for easier navigation between various related locations within the text. In particular, the resulting document is scalable for use on hand-held and wireless devices, and for easy use in a teaching context. We also describe how the lessons we have learned during this process have been applied to the design and implementation of digital databases for mathematical problem-sets, specifically discussing in detail projects involving the digitization and enhancement of two large problem-sets. One is a near complete collection of problems posed and solved by Murray Klamkin (1921--2004) who played a key role in the development of the US Mathematical Olympiad team, and the other consists of several thousand problems and solutions from \emph{Crux Mathematicorum}. In each case we are concerned with material which is still expected to have a print version.