Cross-tolerance

Abstract: The selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) has been shown to modulate cannabinoid-induced antinociception by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC). However, it is not known whether nor-BNI blocks other pharmacological effects of delta 9-THC or if this is a specific action of nor-BNI. Studies were conducted in which pretreatment with nor-BNI (2, 10 and 20 micrograms i.t.) selectively blocked delta 9-THC-induced antinociception while not significantly affecting other commonly observed cannabinoid actions, which included hypothermia, hypoactivity and catalepsy. Chronic administration studies were performed to determine if cross tolerance could be established between delta 9-THC and the highly specific kappa opioid receptor agonists, U-50,488H and CI-977. The chronic delta 9-THC-treated groups were significantly tolerant, not only to i.t. delta 9-THC-induced antinociception in the tail-flick test, but also to i.t. U-50,488 and CI-977 compared with those treated chronically with vehicle. They were not cross tolerant to either DAMGO or DPDPE. Dose-response curves were generated for both delta 9-THC (i.t.) and CI-977 (i.t.) in mice tolerant to delta 9-THC and CI-977. Parallel shifts to the right of the delta 9-THC dose-response curves were observed in animals tolerant to delta 9-THC and also in animals tolerant to CI-977. Animals tolerant to CI-977 also demonstrated parallel shifts of the dose-response curves of both delta 9-THC and CI-977. This study demonstrated that cannabinoid actions can be distinguished from each other. The pharmacological separation of antinociception from the other cannabinoid-induced actions implies that it may have a mechanism distinct from other effects. In addition, this study indicates that delta 9-THC and the kappa opioid agonists may share a common mechanism of action in the production of antinociception and that a possible interaction exists between i.t. administered cannabinoid compounds and the kappa opioid receptor.

Abstract: Female DBA mice were subjected to one of four treatments: ethanol-containing or control diets, nicotine (0.2, 1.0, 5.0 mg/kg/hr) infusion or saline infusion. After removal from the liquid diets or cessation of infusion, the animals were challenged with an acute dose of ethanol or nicotine. Chronic ethanol-fed mice were tolerant to the effects of ethanol on body temperature and open field activity and were cross tolerant to the effects of nicotine on body temperature and heart rate. Nicotine infused animals were tolerant to the effects of nicotine on body temperature and rotarod performance and were cross tolerant to the effects of ethanol on body temperature. Ethanol-induced sleep time was decreased in chronic ethanol- but not chronic nicotine-treated mice. Chronic drug treatment did not alter the elimination rate of either drug. Chronic ethanol treatment did not alter the number or affinity of brain nicotinic receptors whereas chronic nicotine treatment elicited an increase in the number of [3H]-nicotine binding sites. Tolerance and cross tolerance between ethanol and nicotine is discussed in terms of potential effects on desensitization of brain nicotinic receptors.

Abstract: 1 Mice pretreated intraperitoneally for 2 days with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC) at a dose of 20 mg kg−1 day−1 and then challenged intravenously with this drug, 24 h after the second pretreatment, showed a 6 fold tolerance to the hypothermic effect of delta-9-THC. This pretreatment also induced tolerance to the hypothermic effects of the cannabimimetic agents, CP 55,940 (4.6 fold) and WIN 55,212-2 (4.9 fold), but not to the hypothermic effect of the putative endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide. 2 Vasa deferentia removed from mice pretreated intraperitoneally with delta-9-THC twice at a dose of 20 mg kg−1 day−1 were less sensitive to its inhibitory effect on electrically-evoked contractions than vasa deferentia obtained from control animals. The cannabinoid pretreatment induced a 30 fold parallel rightward shift in the lower part of the concentration-response curve of delta-9-THC and a marked reduction in the maximal inhibitory effect of the drug. It also induced tolerance to the inhibitory effects on the twitch response of CP 55,940 (8.7 fold), WIN 55,212-2 (9.6 fold) and anandamide (12.3 fold). 3 The results confirm that cannabinoid tolerance can be rapid in onset and support the hypothesis that it is mainly pharmacodynamic in nature. The finding that in vivo pretreatment with delta-9-THC can produce tolerance not only to its own inhibitory effect on the vas deferens but also to that of three other cannabimimetic agents, suggests that this tissue would be suitable as an experimental model for investigating the mechanisms responsible for cannabinoid tolerance. 4 Further experiments are required to establish why tolerance to anandamide-induced hypothermia was not produced by a pretreatment with delta-9-THC that did induce tolerance to the hypothermic effects of delta-9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2 and to the inhibitory effects of delta-9-THC, CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and anandamide on the twitch response of the vas deferens.