About: Crop is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4781 publications have been published within this topic receiving 90275 citations. The topic is also known as: agricultural crop & agricultural crops.
TL;DR: Despite a clear increase in pesticide use, crop losses have not significantly decreased during the last 40 years, however, pesticide use has enabled farmers to modify production systems and to increase crop productivity without sustaining the higher losses likely to occur from an increased susceptibility to the damaging effect of pests.
Abstract: Productivity of crops grown for human consumption is at risk due to the incidence of pests, especially weeds, pathogens and animal pests. Crop losses due to these harmful organisms can be substantial and may be prevented, or reduced, by crop protection measures. An overview is given on different types of crop losses as well as on various methods of pest control developed during the last century.Estimates on potential and actual losses despite the current crop protection practices are given for wheat, rice, maize, potatoes, soybeans, and cotton for the period 2001–03 on a regional basis (19 regions) as well as for the global total. Among crops, the total global potential loss due to pests varied from about 50% in wheat to more than 80% in cotton production. The responses are estimated as losses of 26–29% for soybean, wheat and cotton, and 31, 37 and 40% for maize, rice and potatoes, respectively. Overall, weeds produced the highest potential loss (34%), with animal pests and pathogens being less important (losses of 18 and 16%). The efficacy of crop protection was higher in cash crops than in food crops. Weed control can be managed mechanically or chemically, therefore worldwide efficacy was considerably higher than for the control of animal pests or diseases, which rely heavily on synthetic chemicals. Regional differences in efficacy are outlined. Despite a clear increase in pesticide use, crop losses have not significantly decreased during the last 40 years. However, pesticide use has enabled farmers to modify production systems and to increase crop productivity without sustaining the higher losses likely to occur from an increased susceptibility to the damaging effect of pests.The concept of integrated pest/crop management includes a threshold concept for the application of pest control measures and reduction in the amount/frequency of pesticides applied to an economically and ecologically acceptable level. Often minor crop losses are economically acceptable; however, an increase in crop productivity without adequate crop protection does not make sense, because an increase in attainable yields is often associated with an increased vulnerability to damage inflicted by pests.
TL;DR: An expert elicitation survey estimates yield losses for the five major food crops worldwide, suggesting that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases.
Abstract: Crop pathogens and pests reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. They cause substantial economic losses and reduce food security at household, national and global levels. Quantitative, standardized information on crop losses is difficult to compile and compare across crops, agroecosystems and regions. Here, we report on an expert-based assessment of crop health, and provide numerical estimates of yield losses on an individual pathogen and pest basis for five major crops globally and in food security hotspots. Our results document losses associated with 137 pathogens and pests associated with wheat, rice, maize, potato and soybean worldwide. Our yield loss (range) estimates at a global level and per hotspot for wheat (21.5% (10.1–28.1%)), rice (30.0% (24.6–40.9%)), maize (22.5% (19.5–41.1%)), potato (17.2% (8.1–21.0%)) and soybean (21.4% (11.0–32.4%)) suggest that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations, and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases. Our assessment highlights differences in impacts among crop pathogens and pests and among food security hotspots. This analysis contributes critical information to prioritize crop health management to improve the sustainability of agroecosystems in delivering services to societies. An expert elicitation survey estimates yield losses for the five major food crops worldwide, suggesting that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases.
TL;DR: The results support the view that intraspecific crop diversification provides an ecological approach to disease control that can be highly effective over a large area and contribute to the sustainability of crop production.
Abstract: Crop heterogeneity is a possible solution to the vulnerability of monocultured crops to disease1,2,3. Both theory4 and observation2,3 indicate that genetic heterogeneity provides greater disease suppression when used over large areas, though experimental data are lacking. Here we report a unique cooperation among farmers, researchers and extension personnel in Yunnan Province, China—genetically diversified rice crops were planted in all the rice fields in five townships in 1998 and ten townships in 1999. Control plots of monocultured crops allowed us to calculate the effect of diversity on the severity of rice blast, the major disease of rice5. Disease-susceptible rice varieties planted in mixtures with resistant varieties had 89% greater yield and blast was 94% less severe than when they were grown in monoculture. The experiment was so successful that fungicidal sprays were no longer applied by the end of the two-year programme. Our results support the view that intraspecific crop diversification provides an ecological approach to disease control that can be highly effective over a large area and contribute to the sustainability of crop production.
TL;DR: Several research and survey reports have described the worldwide occurrence and epidemic levels of scab during the past century, and extensive surveys of producers’ fields have provided assessments of head blighting severity, which were translated into yield loss estimates.
Abstract: cab can be a devastating disease affecting all classes of wheat and other small grains. This fungal disease, also called Fusarium head blight (FHB), has the ability to completely destroy a potentially high-yielding crop within a few weeks of harvest. Lush, green fields become blighted seemingly overnight (Figs. 1 and 2). Frequent rainfalls, high humidities, and/or heavy dews that coincide with the flowering and early kernel-fill period of the crop favor infection and development of the disease. Damage from head scab is multifold: reduced yields, discolored, shriveled “tombstone” kernels (Figs. 3 to 5), contamination with mycotoxins, and reduction in seed quality. The disease also reduces test weight and lowers market grade. Difficulties in marketing, exporting, processing, and feeding scabby grain are experienced. In North America, Fusarium graminearum Schwabe (teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein.) Petch; synonym = G. saubinetti) predominates among several Fusarium species that can cause scab (4,5,8,40,48,60). Other species may predominate in cooler climates or where crops other than wheat and corn are dominant (8,40,48,60). F. graminearum also is associated with stalk and ear rot of corn and may cause a root rot of cereals. The fungus persists and multiplies on infected crop residues of small grains and corn. The chaff, light-weight kernels, and other infected head debris of wheat and barley, returned to the soil surface during harvest, serve as important sites of overwintering of the fungus. Continued moist weather during the crop growing season favors development of the fungus, and spores are windblown or water-splashed onto heads of cereal crops. Wheat and barley are susceptible to head infection from the flowering (pollination) period up through the soft dough stage of kernel development. Spores of the causal fungus may land on the exposed anthers of the flower and then grow into the kernels, glumes, or other head parts. Excellent descriptions of the disease cycle and spore stages of the causal fungi have been published (4,8,21,40,48). Mycotoxins are frequently associated with the growth and invasion of cereal grains by scab fungi. The most common toxin associated with F. graminearum– infected grain is vomitoxin (deoxynivalenol). Vomitoxin is known to cause vomiting and feed refusal in nonruminant animals and poses a threat to other animals and humans if exposure levels are high (45). The presence of mycotoxins in infected grain further exacerbates the losses that scab can cause. Recent articles have reviewed the epidemiology, management, and history of scab outbreaks in the United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and South America (5,40,45,48). As these papers indicate, numerous research and survey reports have described the worldwide occurrence and epidemic levels of scab during the past century. Yield loss reports have not always been based on replicated research trials, but extensive surveys of producers’ fields have provided assessments of head blighting severity, which were translated into yield loss estimates. In the United States, scab was found in 31 of 40 states surveyed in 1917, with losses estimated at 288,000 metric tons (10.6 million bushels), primarily in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois (4). Scab caused an estimated loss of 2.18 million metric tons (80 million bushels) of winter and spring wheat throughout the United States in 1919 (14). Extensive field surveys
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a global data set of monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000 (MIRCA2000) with a spatial resolution of 5 arc min (about 9.2 km at the equator).
Abstract: [1] To support global-scale assessments that are sensitive to agricultural land use, we developed the global data set of monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000 (MIRCA2000). With a spatial resolution of 5 arc min (about 9.2 km at the equator), MIRCA2000 provides both irrigated and rainfed crop areas of 26 crop classes for each month of the year. The data set covers all major food crops as well as cotton. Other crops are grouped into categories (perennial, annual, and fodder grasses). It represents multicropping systems and maximizes consistency with census-based national and subnational statistics. According to MIRCA2000, 25% of the global harvested areas are irrigated, with a cropping intensity (including fallow land) of 1.12, as compared to 0.84 for the sum of rainfed and irrigated harvested crops. For the dominant crops (rice (1.7 million km2 harvested area), wheat (2.1 million km2), and maize (1.5 million km2)), roughly 60%, 30%, and 20% of the harvested areas are irrigated, respectively, and half of the citrus, sugar cane, and cotton areas. While wheat and maize are the crops with the largest rainfed harvested areas (1.5 million km2 and 1.2 million km2, respectively), rice is clearly the crop with the largest irrigated harvested area (1.0 million km2), followed by wheat (0.7 million km2) and maize (0.3 million km2). Using MIRCA2000, 33% of global crop production and 44% of total cereal production were determined to come from irrigated agriculture.