TL;DR: Orthodontic forces can be treated mathematically as vectors to predict tooth movement, and the ratio between the net moment and net force on a tooth (M/F ratio) with reference to the center of resistance determines the centre of rotation.
TL;DR: In this paper, the International System of Units (ISUUsUs) is used to measure the number of forces in a system of connected rigid bodies, and the relationship between the forces and the properties of the body is discussed.
Abstract: 1. General Principles. Mechanics. Fundamental Concepts. Units of Measurement. The International System of Units. Numerical Calculations. 2. Force Vectors. Scalars and Vectors. Vector Operations. Vector Addition of Forces. Addition of a System of Coplanar Forces. Cartesian Vectors. Addition and Subtraction of Cartesian Vectors. Position Vectors. Force Vector Directed Along a Line. Dot Product. 3. Equilibrium of a Particle. Condition for the Equilibrium of a Particle. The Free-Body Diagram. Coplanar Force Systems. Three-Dimensional Force Systems. 4. Force System Resultants. Moment of a Force--Scalar Formation. Cross Product. Moment of a Force--Vector Formulation. Principle of Moments. Moment of a Force About a Specified Axis. Moment of a Couple. Equivalent System. Resultants of a Force and Couple System. Further Reduction of a Force and Couple System. Reduction of a Simple Distributed Loading. 5. Equilibrium of a Rigid Body. Conditions for Rigid-Body Equilibrium. Equilibrium in Two Dimensions. Free-Body Diagrams. Equations of Equilibrium. Two- and Three-Force Members. Equilibrium in Three Dimensions. Free-Body Diagrams. Equations of Equilibrium. Constraints for a Rigid Body. 6. Structural Analysis. Simple Trusses. The Method of Joints. Zero-Force Members. The Method of Sections. Space Trusses. Frames and Machines. 7. Internal Forces. Internal Forces Developed in Structural Members. Shear and Moment Equations and Diagrams. Relations Between Distributed Load, Shear, and Moment. Cables. 8. Friction. Characteristics of Dry Friction. Problems Involving Dry Friction. Wedges. Frictional Forces on Screws. Frictional Forces on Flat Belts. Frictional Forces on Collar Bearings, Pivot Bearings, and Disks. Frictional Forces on Journal Bearings. Rolling Resistance. 9. Center of Gravity and Centroid. Center of Gravity and Center of Mass for a System of Particles. Center of Gravity, Center of Mass, and Centroid for a Body. Composite Bodies. Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus. Resultant of a General Distributed Force System. Fluid Pressure. 10. Moments of Inertia. Definitions of Moments of Inertia for Areas. Parallel-Axis Theorem for an Area. Radius of Gyration of an Area. Moments of Inertia for an Area by Integration. Moments of Inertia for Composite Areas. Product of Inertia for an Area. Moments of Inertia for an Area About Inclined Axes. Mohr's Circle for Moments of Inertia. Mass Moment of Inertia. 11. Virtual Work. Definition of Work and Virtual Work. Principle of Virtual Work for a Particle and a Rigid Body. Principle of Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies. Conservative Forces. Potential Energy. Potential Energy Criterion for Equilibrium. Stability of Equilibrium. Appendixes. A. Mathematical Expressions. B. Numerical and Computer Analysis. Answers. Index.
TL;DR: A comprehensive, geometrically accurate, nonlinear C0-C7 FE model of head and cervical spine based on the actual geometry of a human cadaver specimen offers potentials for biomedical and injury studies.
TL;DR: This study confirmed earlier ones that have shown that muscle forces should not be neglected when studying the stresses in the lumbar spine and showed that muscles do in fact have a major influence on the mechanical behaviour of the spine and should always be taken into account.
TL;DR: Implantation of the Dynesys did not affect peak facet contact forces in extension or axial rotation compared with an intact specimen, but did alter these loads in flexion and lateral bending, and the spacer length affected the compression of the posterior elements.
Abstract: STUDY DESIGN Facet contact forces in the lumbar spine were measured during flexibility tests using thin film electroresistive sensors in intact cadaveric spine specimens and in injured specimens stabilized with a dynamic posterior system. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the Dynesys system on the loading in the facet joints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The Dynesys, a posterior nonfusion device, aims to preserve intersegmental kinematics and reduce facet loads. Recent biomechanical evidence showed that overall motion is less with the Dynesys than in the intact spine, but no studies have shown its effect on facet loads. METHODS Ten human cadaveric lumbar spine specimens (L2-L5) were tested by applying a pure moment of +/-7.5 N m in 3 directions of loading with and without a follower preload of 600 N. Test conditions included an intact specimen and an injured specimen stabilized with 3 Dynesys spacer lengths. Bilateral facet contact forces were measured during flexibility tests using thin film electroresistive sensors (Tekscan 6900). RESULTS Implanting the Dynesys significantly increased peak facet contact forces in flexion (from 3 N to 22 N per side) and lateral bending (from 14 N to 24 N per side), but had no significant effect on the magnitude of the peak forces in extension and axial rotation. Peak facet loads were significantly lower with the long spacer compared with the short spacer in flexion and lateral bending. CONCLUSION Implantation of the Dynesys did not affect peak facet contact forces in extension or axial rotation compared with an intact specimen, but did alter these loads in flexion and lateral bending. The spacer length affected the compression of the posterior elements, with a shorter spacer typically producing greater facets loads than a longer one.