About: Counterpoint is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 937 publications have been published within this topic receiving 7851 citations. The topic is also known as: contrapuntal & musical counterpoint.
TL;DR: Ineluctable visualities as mentioned in this paper, the right to look is defined as "the right to think with and against visuality" in the context of art and literature. But this is not the case for all artworks.
Abstract: List of Illustrations ix Preface. Ineluctable Visualities xiii Acknowledgments xvii Introduction. The Right to Look, or, How to Think With and Against Visuality 1 Visualizing Visuality 35 1. Oversight: The Ordering of Slavery 48 2. The Modern Imaginary: Anti-Slavery Revolutions and the Right to Existence 77 Puerto Rican Counterpoint I 117 3. Visuality: Authority and War 123 4. Abolition Realism: Reality, Realisms, and Revolution 155 Puerto Rican Counterpoint II 188 5. Imperial Visuality and Countervisuality, Ancient and Modern 196 6. Anti-Fascist Neorealisms: North-South and the Permanent Battle for Algiers 232 Mexican-Spanish Counterpoint 271 7. Global Counterinsurgency and the Crisis of Visuality 277 Notes 311 Bibliography 343 Index 373
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey of works in the genre of music and sound, including music, sound, and sound of the classical and romantic form of music in the classical music genre.
Abstract: Preface Music and Sound Imagining the sound Romantic paradoxes: the absent melody Classical and Romantic pedal Conception and realization Tone color and structure Fragments Renewal The Fragment as Romantic form Open and closed Words and music The emancipation of musical language Experimental endings and cyclical forms Ruins Disorders Quotations and memories Absence: the melody suppressed Mountains and Song Cycles Horn calls Landscape and music Landscape and the double time scale Mountains as ruins Landscape and memory Music and memory Landscape and death: Schubert The unfinished workings of the past Song cycles without words Formal Interlude Mediants Four-bar phrases Chopin: Counterpoint and the Narrative Forms Poetic inspiration and craft Counterpoint and the single line Narrative form: the ballade Changes of mode Italian opera and J. S. Bach Chopin: Virtuosity Transformed Keyboard exercises Virtuosity and decoration (salon music?) Morbid intensity Chopin: From the Miniature Genre to the Sublime Style Folk music? Rubato Modal harmony? Mazurka as Romantic form The late mazurkas Freedom and tradition Liszt: On Creation as Performance Disreputable greatness Die Lorelei: the distraction of influence The Sonata: the distraction of respectability The invention of Romantic piano sound: the Etudes Conception and realization The masks of Liszt Recomposing: Sonnet no. 104 Self-Portrait as Don Juan Berlioz: Liberation from the Central European Tradition Blind idolaters and perfidious critics Tradition and eccentricity: the idee fixe Chord color and counterpoint Long-range harmony and contrapuntal rhythm: the "Scene d'amour" Mendelssohn and the Invention of Religious Kitsch Mastering Beethoven Transforming Classicism Classical form and modern sensibility Religion in the concert hall Romantic Opera: Politics, Trash, and High Art Politics and melodrama Popular art Bellini Meyerbeer Schumann: Triumph and Failure of the Romantic Ideal The irrational The inspiration of Beethoven and Clara Wieck The inspiration of E.T.A. Hoffmann Out of phase Lyric intensity Failure and triumph Index of Names and Works
TL;DR: Maury Yeston as mentioned in this paper studied the relationship between pitch and meter in tonal music and found some fundamental aspects of logical form in the system of musical rhythm, as well as a basis for understanding the relationships by which unique rhythmic designs are integrated aesthetically in a cohesive musical composition.
Abstract: There are many books on counterpoint and harmony, but few indeed on the theory of rhythm. Those few approach it through its graphic notation, or in terms of metrical feet, as if it were poetry. Maury Yeston treats rhythm instead in the context of sounded music, with a view to clarifying its ambiguous and little studied, but crucial, relationship with pitch. Although his work is strongly influenced by the methods of the German theorist Heinrich Schenker, it is a strikingly original contribution to musical theory in its own right. Maury Yeston begins by developing analytic procedures for understanding the rhythm of tonal music in terms of pitch levels. He then focuses on certain structures that arise from the interaction of these levels, thereby discovering some fundamental aspects of logical form in the system of musical rhythm. In the course of the inquiry, Mr. Yeston redefines traditional notions of meter, syncopation, and accent. In addition, his study provides a basis for understanding the relationships by which unique rhythmic designs are integrated aesthetically in a cohesive musical composition.
TL;DR: In this paper, major figures in the field articulate these opposing arguments in an innovative "point" and "counterpoint" structure. But their arguments are signposted in an introduction by the editors who are acclaimed academics in their own right.
Abstract: * Introduces readers to the central tensions and debates of organization studies. * Celebrates the productive heterogeneity of the field by placing competing perspectives side by side. * Includes contributions from major figures in the field. * Structured in an innovative ′point′ and ′counterpoint′ format. Since the publication of Burrell and Morgan’s Sociological Paradigms and Organization Theory in 1979, organization studies has been the site of lively debate, centered on significant ′paradigm differences′ between theorists who take divergent positions on a range of important research issues. In this volume, major figures in the field articulate these opposing arguments in an innovative ′point′ and ′counterpoint′ structure. Leading exponents of different theories, including Bill McKelvey, Karl E. Weick, Barbara Czarniawska, Roderick M. Kramer and Lex Donaldson, present their case in counterpoint to their adversaries, challenging readers to engage in the dialogue. The arguments are signposted in an introduction by the editors, who are acclaimed academics in their own right.