About: Converse implication is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 115 publications have been published within this topic receiving 1867 citations. The topic is also known as: implied by & ←.
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that if a ring of characteristic zero has rational singularity, then its modulo p reduction is F -rational for almost all characteristic p. This result leads to the correspondence of F -regular rings and log terminal singularities.
Abstract: The notions of F -rational and F -regular rings are defined via tight closure, which is a closure operation for ideals in a commutative ring of positive characteristic. The geometric significance of these notions has persisted, and K. E. Smith proved that F -rational rings have rational singularities. We now ask about the converse implication. The answer to this question is yes and no. For a fixed positive characteristic, there is a rational singularity which is not F -rational, so the answer is no. In this paper, however, we aim to show that the answer is yes in the following sense: If a ring of characteristic zero has rational singularity, then its modulo p reduction is F -rational for almost all characteristic p . This result leads us to the correspondence of F -regular rings and log terminal singularities.
TL;DR: In this article, a sharp equivalence between decay with distance of spin correlations and rapid mixing of the Glauber dynamics has been proved for Zd with nearest-neighbor interactions.
TL;DR: It is proved that if alanguage L reduces to the task of improper learning of circuits, then, depending on the type of the reduction in use, either L has a statistical zero-knowledge argument system, or the worst-case hardness of L implies the existence of a weak variant of one-way functions defined by Ostrovsky-Wigderson (ISTCS '93).
Abstract: We consider the question of whether P ne NP implies that there exists some concept class that is efficientlyrepresentable but is still hard to learn in the PAC model of Valiant (CACM '84), where the learner is allowed to output any efficient hypothesis approximating the concept, including an "improper" hypothesis that is not itself in the concept class. We show that unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, such a statement cannot be proven via a large class of reductions including Karp reductions, truth-table reductions, and a restricted form of non-adaptive Turing reductions. Also, a proof that uses a Turing reduction of constant levels of adaptivity would imply an important consequence in cryptography as it yields a transformation from any average-case hard problem in NP to a one-way function. Our results hold even in the stronger model of agnostic learning. These results are obtained by showing that lower bounds for improper learning are intimately related to the complexity of zero-knowledge arguments and to the existence of weak cryptographic primitives. In particular, we prove that if alanguage L reduces to the task of improper learning of circuits, then, depending on the type of the reduction in use, either (1) L has a statistical zero-knowledge argument system, or (2) the worst-case hardness of L implies the existence of a weak variant of one-way functions defined by Ostrovsky-Wigderson (ISTCS '93). Interestingly, we observe that the converse implication also holds. Namely, if (1) or (2) hold then the intractability of L implies that improper learning is hard.
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that if Euclidean is replaced by n-dimensional Banach space, the direct statement is true, but the converse statement is false.
Abstract: In Euclidean space a set of constant width has the property that it is not a proper subset of any set of the same diameter. The converse implication is also true. Here we show that if Euclidean is replaced byn-dimensional Banach space the direct statement is true, but the converse statement is false. Attention is drawn to the problem of characterising those Banach spaces of finite dimension for which the converse is true.
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the converse implication "BAP=~basis" does not hold in general; this answers problems asked by a number of authors (e.g. [14], [18], [27]).
Abstract: can be approximated by finite rank operators uniformly on compact sets. It is clear that Xhasabasis ~ XhasBAP =~ XhasAP The fact that the converse implication to the second one does not hold in general was discovered by Figiel and Johnson [8] soon after Enflo's example [7] of a space without AP. The main purpose of this paper is to show that also the implication "BAP=~basis" does not hold in general; this answers problems asked by a number of authors (e.g. [14], [18], [27]). Before stating the result, we recall more notation. For a given basis (x n) of X one denotes by bc (x n) (the basis constant of ix~)) the smallest K such that