About: Conjunctive adverb is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 13 publications have been published within this topic receiving 26 citations. The topic is also known as: adverbial conjunction & subordinating adverb.
TL;DR: The concepts of conjunctive adverb and discourse marker are highly problematic as discussed by the authors and they have been defined and described withinFunctional Grammar as connective units which go beyond sentence boundaries.
Abstract: discourse markers. Conjunctive adverbs have been defined and described within
Functional Grammar as connective units which go beyond sentence boundaries. From a
discourse-oriented perspective, these units could be also considered discourse markers.
The concepts of conjunctive adverb and discourse marker are highly problematic.
Overlapping these two approaches to the same lexical items gives us the opportuniy of
revisiting definitions, features and parameters, in order to have a clearer view of the roles
performed by these words in actual texts. To illustrate the discussion, a number of passages
coming from different Classical Greek types of texts are provided.
TL;DR: In this article, the adverb ἅμα has been analyzed in ancient Greek to determine its potential conjunctive usage and compare it with its usage as an adverb of simultaneity.
Abstract: In modern Indoeuropean languages some adverbs are used as conjunctives, i.e., as a connector in which the semantic and pragmatic links between two or more elements, often coordinated, are explicited. Although this has hardly been addressed in ancient Greek so far, close analysis of some adverbs shows signs of a conjunctive usage in a very similar way as in modern Indoeuropean languages. In this paper we study the adverb ἅμα in Homer, Plato and Xenophon in order to determine its potential conjunctive usage and compare it with its usage as an adverb of simultaneity. Analysis of the selected authors leads to the conclusion that ἅμα is used as a conjunctive adverb in all of them. This usage, in which ἅμα has an additive value, is restricted in Homer to the syntagma, but extends in Plato and Xenophon to larger syntactic units.
TL;DR: In this article, the linguistic status of the italian reformulation marker cioe, considered essentially a conjunctive adverb, is analyzed and the implications of this range of functions in teaching Italian as a second language.
Abstract: This paper addresses the linguistic status of the italian reformulation marker cioe, considered essentially a conjunctive adverb. We analyse its lexical value and the projection that reaches in the construction of discourse. We pay special attention to their metatextual functions (always in contrast with Spanish): objective reformulation marker, subjective reformulator marker and deductive connector. We provide finally, from a contrastive approach, the implications of this range of functions in teaching Italian as a second language.
TL;DR: Several possible factors, such as the position of a conjunctive adverb in a sentence and national punctuation features of a non-native English speaker (researcher), which may affect the inconsistency in punctuating scientific corpora are discussed.
TL;DR: This article reviewed the most important functions of δτι in the corpus of classical oratory (specifically in Lysias, Isocrates and Demosthenes) and in the Platonic dialogues: predicate adjunct, modifier of the head of a phrase, focus adverb, apodotic or correlative, conjunctive adverb and discourse marker.
Abstract: This work reviews the most important functions of ἔτι in the corpus of classical oratory (specifically in Lysias, Isocrates and Demosthenes) and in the Platonic dialogues: predicate adjunct (1), modifier of the head of a phrase (2), focus adverb (3), apodotic or correlative (4), conjunctive adverb (5) (the adverb can connect phrases or clauses) and discourse marker (6). The functions of ἔτι as a discourse marker found in our corpus are as follows: discourse structurer (organiser), co-oriented connector (additive and consecutive) and counter-argumentative connector not co-oriented (concessive-adversative).