TL;DR: As the boxed case demonstrates, non-authorised persons can take advantage of the medium to access confidential information and unintentionally violate confidentiality by relying on these flawed methods.
Abstract: #### CASE EXAMPLE
An anxious Mrs Jones calls the GP to obtain the results of her 16-year-old daughter's blood test. For reasons of confidentiality, the GP declines to offer any information about his patient. Disgusted by the GP's refusal, Mrs Jones asks her other teenage daughter to phone the surgery and impersonate her sister. She successfully extracts the information. Can anything be done to prevent such violations of confidentiality?
Patients commonly use the telephone to obtain test results and other medical information from their GPs.1–3 This allows patients and their families to be informed quickly and without leaving their home. However, the practical advantages of telephone calls are offset by risks to patient confidentiality.4 As the boxed case demonstrates, non-authorised persons can take advantage of the medium to access confidential information. Unlike face-to-face conversations, callers cannot identify each other visually and have difficulty identifying the true acoustic properties of their interlocutor's voice.5 Yet, a recent study on telephone consultations in general practice revealed that GPs regularly identify callers by simply asking for their name or recognising their voice.3 It is not known how often doctors unintentionally violate confidentiality by relying on these flawed methods. The recent NHS Confidentiality Code of Practice, which states that staff should ‘check that any callers, by telephone or in person, are who they say they are’ is laudable in principle but lacking in practical advice.6 So how can GPs and medical receptionists realistically check that callers …
TL;DR: In this article, a method to provide confidentiality for the message content in copy received from an electrographic device is disclosed, by utilizing a confidentiality code mark on the first and last sheets of a set of copy for which privacy is desired.
Abstract: An apparatus and method to provide confidentiality for the message content in copy received from an electrographic device is disclosed. Confidentiality is communicated to the apparatus by utilizing a confidentiality code mark on the first and last sheets of a set of copy for which privacy is desired. The confidentiality or non-confidentiality of the copy may also be communicated by using a last sheet of copy containing predetermined code marks. In one embodiment, the apparatus receives sheets of copy output from the elctrographic device and directs sheets of copy that are not confidential in nature into one output tray for removal. The apparatus directs sheets of copy that are confidential in nature into an assembly station for binding. After the last sheet of the confidential document is delivered to the assembly station, the bundle of copy sheets is advanced into a storage tray. The sides of the bundle of copy sheets are bound during its travel. In an alternative embodiment, all sheets of copy are directed to the assembly station. The bundle of sheets are bound according to their confidential or non-confidential nature which is communicated through the use of specifically coded cover sheets. Accordingly, confidentiality of the message content of any document is provided by the method of utilizing cover sheets of the document that contain a confidentiality code mark, but do not contain any sensitive information, and by having the sides of the reproduced document bound along its edges.
TL;DR: The rights of patients participating in illustrations for teaching and medical publications must always be respected.
Abstract: The rights of patients participating in illustrations for teaching and medical publications must always be respected. A contract between patient and clinician subsists in written, informed consent procedures, which in turn are enshrined in a Confidentiality Code of Practice.
TL;DR: Information governance is a large topic, which has at its heart the ethical issue when it is right to share information.
Abstract: Information governance is a large topic, which has at its heart the ethical issue when it is right to share information. Data protection is built around some core principles, which are incorporated in HIPAA and GDPR legislation. Healthcare staff are usually required to sign a confidentiality code of conduct. Computer systems use the concepts of consent, authentication (including OAuth) and authorization to implement access control policies. Cryptography is used to protect data from unauthorized reading. Individuals and organizations have rights and responsibilities, which may include anonymization or pseudonymization of data. These are usually set out in legal contracts.
TL;DR: A debate upon the boundary between confidentiality and the defence of the physician in cases of unsubstantiated complaints is discussed and historic cases of abuse of psychiatry are presented.
Abstract: The paper discusses the controversy surrounding the medical ethics code. It was noticed that there exists a lack of a psychiatric regulation in the law. Also, considered were the dangers for the patient associated with the low tolerance of the society and with the reform of the health care system. Historic cases of abuse of psychiatry (euthanasia, sterilization, using patients in research, political abuse, forensic cases and the breaking of the confidentiality code) are presented. Some of these issues will be resolved once the law protecting mental health comes into being. The paper ends with a debate upon the boundary between confidentiality and the defence of the physician in cases of unsubstantiated complaints.