About: Complement (linguistics) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 827 publications have been published within this topic receiving 12478 citations.
TL;DR: The authors studied the effect of adposition stranding on successive cyclicity in natural languages and proposed a theory of mirror theory for downward head movement, which is based on a derivational model of the grammar.
Abstract: This thesis studies movement operations in natural languages. It is observed that certain heads – C° , v°, and, in most languages, P° – cannot be stranded; the complements of these heads never move without pied-piping the heads in question. This is surprising since (a) extraction out of CP, vP, and PP is possible in principle and (b) the complement categories of these heads, TP, VP, and DP or PP, are movable. Evidence for the more contentious of these claims is provided in chapters 3 and 4. Chapter 4 also investigates the ramifications of these facts for theories of adposition stranding. All heads in question have independently been argued to project what Chomsky (2000) calls ‘phases’. The generalization is that phase heads cannot be stranded. Chapter 2 derives the ban against stranding phase heads within a derivational model of the grammar. The effect of phases on successive cyclicity is the following: To be licit, movement out of a phase must pass through the specifier position of that phase. The idea of the account is that every step of movement must establish a relation between the moved item and some other element in the phrase marker which is in a well-defined sense closer than the relation they were in prior to movement. Movement from complement to specifier position within the same phrase never achieves this. In fact, any movement within the same phrase is in effect too short to achieve this. There are then well-defined anti-locality effects, which fallout from considerations of local economy. The ban against stranding phase heads now follows. A category can leave its containing phase only by passing through its specifier position. Since complements cannot reach the specifier position in the same phrase, the complements of phase heads cannot move away. Head Movement is prohibited by the same economy based reasoning. Chapter 5 focuses on Head Movement, advocating a version of Brody’s (2000) Mirror Theory. In contrast to standard theories of Head Movement, Mirror Theory predicts what looks like downward Head Movement to be possible. Data from VP-ellipsis in English show that this prediction of Mirror Theory is correct.
TL;DR: This paper investigated the development of complex sentences from simple non-embedded sentences and found that complex sentences including complement and relative clauses evolve from simple sentences that are gradually expanded to multiple-clause constructions.
Abstract: This book presents a comprehensive study of how children acquire complex sentences. Drawing on observational data from English-speaking children aged 2 to 5, Holger Diessel investigates the acquisition of infinitival and participial complement clauses, finite complement clauses, finite and nonfinite relative clauses, adverbial clauses, and coordinate clauses. His investigation shows that the development of complex sentences originates from simple non-embedded sentences and that two different developmental pathways can be distinguished: complex sentences including complement and relative clauses evolve from simple sentences that are gradually expanded to multiple-clause constructions, and complex sentences including adverbial and coordinate clauses develop from simple sentences that are integrated in a specific biclausal unit. He argues that the acquisition process is determined by a variety of factors: the frequency of the various complex sentences in the ambient language, the semantic and syntactic complexity of the emerging constructions, the communicative functions of complex sentences, and the social-cognitive development of the child.
TL;DR: It is argued that this non-presuppositional use of factive verbs provides support for the (minority) view that presupposition is not a conventional property of lexical items.
TL;DR: This is a comprehensive reference grammar of Tariana, an endangered Arawak language from a remote region in the northwest Amazonian jungle, which combines a number of features inherited from the protolanguage with properties diffused from neighbouring but unrelated Tucanoan languages.
Abstract: List of tables, schemes and diagrams Preface Acknowledgements Organisation and cross-referencing List of abbreviations Map 1. The language and its speakers 2. Phonology 3. Word classes 4. Nominal morphology and noun structure 5. Noun classes and classifiers 6. Possession 7. Case marking and grammatical relations 8. Number 9. Further nominal categories 10. Derivation and compounding 11. Closed word classes 12. Verb classes and predicate structure 13. Valency changing and argument rearranging mechanisms 14. Tense and evidentiality 15. Aspect, Aktionsart and degree 16. Mood and modality 17. Negation 18. Serial verb constructions and verb compounding 19. Complex predicates 20. Participles and nominalisations 21. Clause types and other syntactic issues 22. Subordinate clauses and clause linking 23. Relative clauses 24. Complement clauses 25. Discourse organisation 26. Issues in etymology and semantics Appendix Texts Vocabulary References Index.
TL;DR: This paper examined the interplay of referential and structural factors during sentence processing in discourse and found that during the processing of sentences in discourse, structural sources of information interact on a word-by-word basis.