About: Communication Intervention is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 615 publications have been published within this topic receiving 14481 citations.
TL;DR: Intensive communication was associated with a reduction in critical care use by patients who died and the intervention, which allowed dying patients earlier access to palliative care, was not associated with increased mortality.
TL;DR: The interventions were associated with improved physician and patient communication behaviors and the challenge for future research is to design effective patient and physician interventions that can be integrated into practice.
Abstract: Objective:We sought to synthesize the findings of studies examining interventions to enhance the communication behaviors of physicians and patients during outpatient encounters.Methods:We conducted searches of 6 databases between 1966 and 2005 to identify studies for a systematic review and synthesi
TL;DR: The extent to which previous research has helped identify a compendium of effective instructional practices that can guide clinical practice is outlined and needs for further research to refine and extend current treatment approaches and to investigate more comprehensive treatment packages are highlighted.
Abstract: Empirical studies evaluating speech and language intervention procedures applied to children with autism are reviewed, and the documented benefits are summarized. In particular, interventions incorporating sign language, discrete-trial training, and milieu teaching procedures have been used successfully to expand the communication repertoires of children with autism. Other important developments in the field stem from interventions designed to replace challenging behaviors and to promote social and scripted interactions. The few studies of the parent and classroom training studies that included language measures also are analyzed. This article seeks to outline the extent to which previous research has helped identify a compendium of effective instructional practices that can guide clinical practice. It also seeks to highlight needs for further research to refine and extend current treatment approaches and to investigate more comprehensive treatment packages.
TL;DR: This chapter discusses the Writing Lab Approach for Building Language, Literacy, and Communication Abilities, and the Focused Stimulation Approach to Language Intervention.
Abstract: 1. Introduction 3. Prelinguistic Communication Intervention 4. It Takes Two to Talk 5. The Picture Exchange Communication System 6. The System for Augmenting Language 8. Focused Stimulation Approach to Language Intervention 9. Enhanced Milleu Teaching 10. Conversational Recast Intervention in Preschool 12. Phonological Awareness Intervention 13. Balanced Reading Intervention and Assessment 14. Visual Strategies to Facilitate Written Language Development 15. The Writing Lab Approach for Building Language, Literacy, and Communication Abilities.
TL;DR: The protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent, structured communication intervention designed to identify patients, train clinicians to use a structured guide for advanced care planning discussion with patients, and document outcomes of the discussion in a structured format in the electronic medical record is described.
Abstract: Introduction: Ensuring that patients receive care that is consistent with their goals and values is a critical component of high-quality care. This article describes the protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent, structured communication intervention. Methods and analysis: Patients with advanced, incurable cancer and life expectancy of <12 months will participate together with their surrogate. Clinicians are enrolled and randomised either to usual care or the intervention. The Serious Illness Care Program is a multicomponent, structured communication intervention designed to identify patients, train clinicians to use a structured guide for advanced care planning discussion with patients, ‘trigger’ clinicians to have conversations, prepare patients and families for the conversation, and document outcomes of the discussion in a structured format in the electronic medical record. Clinician satisfaction with the intervention, confidence and attitudes will be assessed before and after the intervention. Self-report data will be collected from patients and surrogates approximately every 2 months up to 2 years or until the patient’s death; patient medical records will be examined at the close of the study. Analyses will examine the impact of the intervention on the patient receipt of goal-concordant care, and peacefulness at the end of life. Secondary outcomes include patient anxiety, depression, quality of life, therapeutic alliance, quality of communication, and quality of dying and death. Key process measures include frequency, timing and quality of documented conversations.