TL;DR: The molecular dataset was expanded with representatives from 55 orders and all major lineages and the monophyly of classes Phyllopharyngea, Karyorelictea, Armophorea, Prostomatea, Plagiopylea, Colpodea and Heterotrichea are confirmed.
Abstract: The phylum Ciliophora plays important roles in a wide range of biological studies. However, the evolutionary relationships of many groups remain unclear due to a lack of sufficient molecular data. In this study, molecular dataset was expanded with representatives from 55 orders and all major lineages. The main findings are: (1) 14 classes were recovered including one new class, Protocruziea n. cl.; (2) in addition to the two main branches, Postciliodesmatophora and Intramacronucleata, a third branch, the Mesodiniea, is identified as being basal to the other two subphyla; (3) the newly defined order Discocephalida is revealed to be a sister clade to the euplotids, strongly suggesting the separation of discocephalids from the hypotrichs; (4) the separation of mobilids from the peritrichs is not supported; (5) Loxocephalida is basal to the main scuticociliate assemblage, whereas the thigmotrichs are placed within the order Pleuronematida; (6) the monophyly of classes Phyllopharyngea, Karyorelictea, Armophorea, Prostomatea, Plagiopylea, Colpodea and Heterotrichea are confirmed; (7) ambiguous genera Askenasia, CyclotrichiumParaspathidium and Plagiocampa show close affiliation to the well known plagiopyleans; (8) validity of the subclass Rhynchostomatia is supported, and (9) the systematic positions of Halteriida and Linconophoria remain unresolved and are thus regarded as incertae sedis within Spirotrichea.
TL;DR: Ciliated protozoa are viewed as unicellular organisms structured in a hierarchy of organizational levels that include the macromolecular, suborganellar, unit organellar, organellar complex, and organellar system.
Abstract: Summary
(1) Ciliated protozoa are viewed as unicellular organisms structured in a hierarchy of organizational levels that include the macromolecular, suborganellar, unit organellar, organellar complex, and organellar system.
(2) The ciliate cortex is divided into two major functional regions, the somatic region and the oral region. The fundamental component of the cortex is an organellar complex, the kinetid, whose organizing centre is the kinetosome with which are associated three fibrillar associates diagnostic of ciliates. These three fibrillar associates are the periodically striated kinetodesmal fibril and two microtubular ribbons, the transverse and postciliary ribbons.
(3) Somatic and oral kinetids are found to be of three major types: monokinetids are composed of one kinetosome and its fibrillar associates; dikinetids are composed of two kinetosomes and their fibrillar associates; polykinetids are composed of more than two kinetosomes and their fibrillar associptes.
(4) The mechanisms underlying kinetid function and development remain largely unexplored. Research into the molecular biology and ultrastructure, especially of mutant forms, should provide basic insights in the near future.
(5) The conservation of kinetid structure across major phyla of organisms suggests that this subcellular structure should be useful in phylogenetic analysis despite the concepts of ‘chemical identity’ and ‘organic design’.
(6) The evolutionary rate of change of oral features is greater than that of somatic features, probably due to developmental and ecological factors. Nevertheless both cortical regions are constrained by the phenomenon of structural conservatism; that is, the conservation of structure through time is inversely related to the level of biological organization.
(7) Eight major groupings of ciliate species are recognized, based on ultrastruc-tural features of the cortex. Several examples of differences between these eight groups and the groups presently recognized are discussed.
TL;DR: It is indicated, with strong support, that the aerobic heterotrichs and the karyorelictids sampled constitute a monophyletic group, and the complex mouth architecture which characterizes all heterot richs must be reassessed in light of this finding.
TL;DR: The distribution of nuclear division types along the phylogenetic tree is consistent with the notion that macronuclei incapable of division represent a derived rather than a primitive or “karyorelictid” character trait.
Abstract: The small subunit rRNA gene sequences of the karyorelictean ciliates, Loxodes striatus and Protocruzia sp., and the heterotrichian ciliates, Climacostomum virens and Eufolliculina uhligi, were used to test the evolution of nuclear dualism in the Phylum Ciliophora. Phylogenies derived using a least squares distance method, neighbour joining, and maximum parsimony demonstrate that the karyorelictean ciliates sensu Small and Lynn, 1985 do not form a monophyletic group. However, Loxodes and the heterotrich ciliates form the first branch in the ciliate lineage, and Protocruzia branches, in distance methods, basal to the spirotrich lineage. It is proposed that Protocruzia be removed from the Class Karyorelictea, and placed in closer taxonomic association with the spirotrich lineage. The distribution of nuclear division types along the phylogenetic tree is consistent with the notion that macronuclei incapable of division represent a derived rather than a primitive or "karyorelictid" character trait.
TL;DR: It is determined that the origin of the ciliates (i.e. crown eukaryotes) is much older than previously speculated, dating back to the Paleoproterozoic some 1980 to 2200 million years ago (Ma).