About: Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4 publications have been published within this topic receiving 90 citations.
TL;DR: The MUE results were used to educate physicians regarding the differences and similarities of CSFs and to encourage use of the preferred agent, sargramostim, and concluded that differences in adverse event profiles should not be used to differentiate CSFs.
Abstract: A retrospective medication use evaluation (MUE) was used to determine the comparative incidence of adverse events in patients treated with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). CSFs are high-cost, hig...
TL;DR: Primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte CSFs, before the onset of neutropenia, reduced incidence of febrile neutropania, length of hospitalization and antibiotic use subsequent to high-dose chemotherapy in SCLC patients, whereas infectious mortality rate, response and survival rates were not improved.
Abstract: Febrile neutropenia is the major dose-limiting toxicity of anticancer chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nadir and duration of neutropenia have been correlated to the risk of developing sepsis [1], increasing healthcare costs and deteriorating quality of life. Despite empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy at the onset of fever and dose reduction of chemotherapy during subsequent cycles, neutropenia-induced mortality remains important, particularly in patients with extensive SCLC. Multivariate analysis has shown that neutrophil recovery is a favourable prognostic factor in febrile neutropenia, independent of the use of antibiotic therapy [2]. The capacities of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) to accelerate granular neutrophil recovery, as well as monocyte and eosinophil with granulocyte-macrophage CSFs (GM-CSFs), allows the hope of a reduction of haematological toxicity or an increased chemotherapy dose intensity. Primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte CSFs (G-CSFs), before the onset of neutropenia, reduced incidence of febrile neutropenia, length of hospitalization and antibiotic use subsequent to high-dose chemotherapy in SCLC patients [3, 4], whereas infectious mortality rate, response and survival rates were not improved. However, the cost-effectiveness of primary GCSF administration still remains controversial, with a high cost counterbalancing these benefits. G-CSF therapy combined with antibiotic therapy, in
TL;DR: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of histiocytic proliferation in the bone marrow after colony-stimulating factor therapy.
Abstract: A 6-year-old white male had a myelodysplastic syndrome (refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation) and was treated with high dose chemotherapy. A combined esterase stain of the marrow blasts showed granulocytic differentiation. Subsequently, persistent pancytopenia with a severely hypocellular bone marrow developed, which was treated with a combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Sixteen days after the initiation of therapy, histologic examination of the bone marrow revealed a marked proliferation of histiocytes. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of histiocytic proliferation in the bone marrow after colony-stimulating factor therapy.
TL;DR: GM-CSF infusion up-regulated the functional markers of inflammation on circulating neutrophils and monocytes and was associated with both the clinical and microbiological resolution of infection.