About: Collimator is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 14444 publications have been published within this topic receiving 123120 citations. The topic is also known as: beam limiting device.
TL;DR: A small field irradiation technique to deliver high doses of single fraction photon radiation to small, precisely located volumes within the brain has been developed and target localization via planar angiography has been added.
Abstract: A small field irradiation technique to deliver high doses of single fraction photon radiation to small, precisely located volumes (05 to 8 cm3) within the brain has been developed Our method uses a modified Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRS), CT-guided, stereotactic system and a 6 MV linear accelerator equipped with a special collimator (diameters of 125 mm to 300 mm projected to isocenter) located 23 cm from isocenter Target localization via planar angiography has been added Treatment consists of a series of arcing beams using both gantry and couch rotations During treatment, the patient's head is immobilized independently of the radiotherapy couch and is precisely positioned without reference to room lasers or light field A precise verification of alignment precedes each treatment Extensive performance tests have shown that a target, localized by CT, can be irradiated with a positional accuracy of 24 mm in any direction with 95% confidence If angiography is used for localization, the results are better The dose 10 cm outside the target volume is less than 20% of the prescribed dose for a medium sized collimator
TL;DR: The current document is an update of an earlier version of single photon emission tomography guidelines that was developed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and should not be used in clinical studies until they have been reviewed and approved by qualified physicians and technologists from their own particular institutions.
TL;DR: The three photon spectra at 6 MV from the machines of three different manufacturers show differences in their shapes as well as in the efficiency of bremsstrahlung production in the corresponding target and filter combinations.
Abstract: A recent paper analyzed the sensitivity to various simulation parameters of the Monte Carlo simulations of nine beams from three major manufacturers of commercial medical linear accelerators, ranging in energy from 4-25 MV. In this work the nine models are used: to calculate photon energy spectra and average energy distributions and compare them to those published by Mohan et al. [Med. Phys. 12, 592-597 (1985)]; to separate the spectra into primary and scatter components from the primary collimator, the flattening filter and the adjustable collimators; and to calculate the contaminant-electron fluence spectra and the electron contribution to the depth-dose curves. Notwithstanding the better precision of the calculated spectra, they are similar to those calculated by Mohan et al. The three photon spectra at 6 MV from the machines of three different manufacturers show differences in their shapes as well as in the efficiency of bremsstrahlung production in the corresponding target and filter combinations. The contribution of direct photons to the photon energy fluence in a 10 x 10 field varies between 92% and 97%, where the primary collimator contributes between 0.6% and 3.4% and the flattening filter contributes between 0.6% and 4.5% to the head-scatter energy fluence. The fluence of the contaminant electrons at 100 cm varies between 5 x 10(-9) and 2.4 x 10(-7) cm(-2) per incident electron on target, and the corresponding spectrum for each beam is relatively invariant inside a 10 x 10 cm2 field. On the surface the dose from electron contamination varies between 5.7% and 11% of maximum dose and, at the depth of maximum dose, between 0.16% and 2.5% of maximum dose. The photon component of the percentage depth-dose at 10 cm depth is compared with the general formula provided by AAPM's task group 51 and confirms the claimed accuracy of 2%.
TL;DR: A multilayered collimator system has been constructed as a practical means to locate the dose ends by measuring prompt gammas and clearly indicated correlations between the gamma distributions and the distal falloff regions.
Abstract: The location of the distal falloff in the proton therapy is an important but often uncertain parameter as different tissue elements are traversed by the beam. A multilayered collimator system has been constructed as a practical means to locate the dose ends by measuring prompt gammas. The collimator is designed to moderate and capture fast neutrons and to prevent unwanted gammas from reaching the scintillation detector. The system has been studied using Monte Carlo technique and has been tested in the beam energy range of 100–200MeV. Measurements clearly indicated correlations between the gamma distributions and the distal falloff regions.
TL;DR: A series of calculations and measurements are performed to quantify head scatter for small fields, collimator transmission, and the transmission through rounded leaf ends, which affect the delivered dose to the prostate by 5%-20% for a typical plan.
Abstract: The use of a multileaf collimator in the dynamic mode to perform intensity modulated radiotherapy became a reality at our institution in 1995. Unlike treatment with static fields using a multileaf collimator, there are significant dosimetric issues which must be assessed before dynamic therapy can be implemented. We have performed a series of calculations and measurements to quantify head scatter for small fields, collimator transmission, and the transmission through rounded leaf ends. If not accounted for, these factors affect the delivered dose to the prostate by 5%-20% for a typical plan. Data obtained with ion chambers and radiographic film are presented for both 6 and 15 MV x-ray beams. The impact on the delivered dose of the mechanical accuracy of the multileaf collimator, achieved during leaf position calibration and maintained during dose delivery, is also discussed.