TL;DR: The evaluation of occlusal factors in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome should not be a mere tabulation of the "hit and slide" but should contain an evaluation of the relative health of the suspension mechanism of centric relation itself.
Abstract: TMJ dysfunction-pain has four main sources: intrajoint, muscle spasm, joint/muscle, and referred. Electromyographic evidence has been cited to show that there is a direct cause-and-effect relationship between occlusal deflective contacts and muscle spasm. In some patients emotional stress can be the primary etiologic agent in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome, but it works indirectly through the tension-relieving mechanism of bruxism. The controversy over the relative importance of stress and occlusion as a primary etiologic agent remains active. It has been suggested that the reason this conflict has remained unresolved is because the criteria for “malocclusion” is indefinite. The clinical assumption that “when the mandible is in the most retruded position of centric relation, both condyles are in correct alignment in the glenoid fossa” has been challenged. The centric relation of each patient should be individually evaluated by comparing the clinical occlusal findings with the TMJ radiographs. Sometimes the clinical centric relation is not healthy (dysfunctional) and the suspension mechanism of the TMJ is faulty. Condylar displacements are caused by a lack of harmony between the occlusion and the resulting orientation of the mandible. The absence of posterior tooth support can also lead to posterior or superior condylar displacement. The evaluation of occlusal factors in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome should not be a mere tabulation of the “hit and slide” but should contain an evaluation of the relative health of the suspension mechanism of centric relation itself. Recent research into the functional parameters of the condylar suspension mechanism indicates that muscles rather than ligaments determine posterior and inferior condylar position. Superior condylar position is influenced by the posterior teeth and meniscus. These observations and experiments have produced a “biophysical” concept of the condylar suspension mechanism. The teeth, muscles, and disc support and guide the condyle in its suspension within the fossa. In adults, alterations in mandibular position will not produce a “corrective remodeling” of the TMJ, and pathologic changes can take place. The TMJ will attempt to physiologically accept condylar displacement; however, in most people, joint and/or muscle dysfunction develops. The level of dysfunction in many patients remains subclinical. The objective of treatment is to correct the occlusion so that the displaced condyles can be repositioned in the middle of the fossa evenly (symmetrically) on both sides. The therapeutic procedure is different in each patient, depending on the type of condylar displacement involved so that a balanced biophysical relationship is established between the teeth, muscles, and TMJ.
TL;DR: The results of the test showed that there was no significant difference between dentures made using two denture techniques that could be detected by subjective means.
Abstract: Dentures were constructed for 64 patients by two different techniques. One technique, designated as "complex," involved more complicated procedures such as a true hinge axis location, balanced occlusion, dentures remounted on an articulator after processing with new interocclusal records, and occlusal corrections made on the articulator. The "standard" technique involved an arbitrary mounting of the maxillary cast on the articulator, arranging the occlusion with centric relation coincident with centric occlusion but without a balanced occlusion, and making occlusal corrections in the mouth. Subjective evaluations were made for each of the 64 patients at initial placement of the dentures and for all active patients at five yearly recall visits following placement. The evaluation method was designed to determine clinical differences between the dentures made by the two techniques. At the end of 5 years, the data obtained at five yearly recall visits were subjected to statistical testing. These tests were performed to determine if the technique by which the dentures were made had any effect on the performance of the dentures that could be detected clinically. The results of the test showed that there was no significant difference between dentures made using two denture techniques that could be detected by subjective means.
TL;DR: The chinpoint-guidance technique, using an anterior programmer, as performed in this study, seems to be a replicable method of locating centric relation.
Abstract: wental literature during the period 1905 to 1978 contains numerous references to the importance of centric relation in prosthodontics, as well as the instruments, techniques, and rationales for obtaining centric relation in dentulous and edentulous patients. Boucher,’ after reviewing the problems of occlusion states, “It seems that there are as many ways to solve the problems of jaw relations and occlusion as there are dentists.” The authors have found some variability in recording of centric relation in almost every technique they observed. Grasso’ and Shafagh3 found centric relation changes within a l-day time period, as well as during a 28-day period. Shafagh3 also found that records made in, the evenings were more consistent and reliable. The purpose of this study was to measure the level of replicability of a clinically accepted technique for registering centric relation using chinpoint-guidance with an anterior programmer similar to the Lucia jig.’ Evenings were selected for making the recordings.
TL;DR: It is recommended that, in orthodontic treatment of children with dual bite, the intercuspal position (centric occlusion) should be established in the posterior occlusal relationship, in accordance with the opinion of several authors.