About: Cefprozil is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 304 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4879 citations. The topic is also known as: Cefzil & Cefprozil anhydrous.
TL;DR: It is shown that standard antibiotic treatment can alter the gut microbiome in a specific, reproducible and predictable manner, and a subgroup of participants who were enriched in the opportunistic pathogen Enterobacter cloacae after exposure to the antibiotic, an effect linked to lower initial microbiome diversity and to a Bacteroides enterotype is identified.
Abstract: Microbiome studies have demonstrated the high inter-individual diversity of the gut microbiota. However, how the initial composition of the microbiome affects the impact of antibiotics on microbial communities is relatively unexplored. To specifically address this question, we administered a second-generation cephalosporin, cefprozil, to healthy volunteers. Stool samples gathered before antibiotic exposure, at the end of the treatment and 3 months later were analysed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. On average, 15 billion nucleotides were sequenced for each sample. We show that standard antibiotic treatment can alter the gut microbiome in a specific, reproducible and predictable manner. The most consistent effect of the antibiotic was the increase of Lachnoclostridium bolteae in 16 out of the 18 cefprozil-exposed participants. Strikingly, we identified a subgroup of participants who were enriched in the opportunistic pathogen Enterobacter cloacae after exposure to the antibiotic, an effect linked to lower initial microbiome diversity and to a Bacteroides enterotype. Although the resistance gene content of participants' microbiomes was altered by the antibiotic, the impact of cefprozil remained specific to individual participants. Resistance genes that were not detectable prior to treatment were observed after a 7-day course of antibiotic administration. Specifically, point mutations in beta-lactamase blaCfxA-6 were enriched after antibiotic treatment in several participants. This suggests that monitoring the initial composition of the microbiome before treatment could assist in the prevention of some of the adverse effects associated with antibiotics or other treatments.
TL;DR: It is indicated that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is significantly less if an oral cephalosporin is prescribed, compared with oral penicillin.
Abstract: Objective. To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis in children. Methodology. Medline, Embase, reference lists, and abstract searches were conducted to identify randomized, controlled trials of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis in children. Trials were included if they met the following criteria: patients Results. Thirty-five trials involving 7125 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall summary odds ratio (OR) for the bacteriologic cure rate significantly favored cephalosporins compared with penicillin (OR: 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.49–3.67, with the individual cephalosporins [cephalexin, cefadroxil, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefdinir] showing superior bacteriologic cure rates). The overall summary OR for clinical cure rate was 2.33 (95% CI: 1.84–2.97), significantly favoring the same individual cephalosporins. There was a trend for diminishing bacterial cure with penicillin over time, comparing the trials published in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Sensitivity analyses for bacterial cure significantly favored cephalosporin treatment over penicillin treatment when trials were grouped as double-blind (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.39–3.85), high-quality (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.85–3.36) trials with well-defined clinical status (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.54–2.90), with detailed compliance monitoring (OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 2.33–3.47), with GABHS serotyping (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 2.42–3.98), with carriers eliminated (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.55–4.08), and with test of cure 3 to 14 days posttreatment (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 2.75–4.54). Analysis of comparative bacteriologic cure rates for the 3 generations of cephalosporins did not show a difference. Conclusions. This meta-analysis indicates that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is significantly less if an oral cephalosporin is prescribed, compared with oral penicillin.
TL;DR: This meta-analysis suggests that 5 days of short-acting antibiotic use is effective treatment for uncomplicated acute otitis media in children.
Abstract: Objective.—To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotic
treatment of acute otitis media in children to determine whether outcomes
were comparable in children treated with antibiotics for less than 7 days
or at least 7 days or more.Data Sources.—MEDLINE (1966-1997), EMBASE (1974-1997), Current Contents, and Science
Citation Index searches were conducted to identify randomized controlled trials
of the treatment of acute otitis media in children with antibiotics of different
durations.Study Selection.—Studies were included if they met the following criteria: subjects aged
4 weeks to 18 years, clinical diagnosis of acute otitis media, no antimicrobial
therapy at time of diagnosis, and randomization to less than 7 days of antibiotic
treatment vs 7 days or more of antibiotic treatment.Data Extraction.—Trial methodological quality was assessed independently by 7 reviewers;
outcomes were extracted as the number of treatment failures, relapses, or
reinfections.Data Synthesis.—Included trials were grouped by antibiotic used in the short course:
(1) 15 short-acting oral antibiotic trials (penicillin V potassium, amoxicillin
[-clavulanate], cefaclor, cefixime, cefuroxime, cefpodoxime proxetil, cefprozil),
(2) 4 intramuscular ceftriaxone sodium trials, and (3) 11 oral azithromycin
trials. The summary odds ratio for treatment outcomes at 8 to 19 days in children
treated with short-acting antibiotics for 5 days vs 8 to 10 days was 1.52
(95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.98) but by 20 to 30 days outcomes between
treatment groups were comparable (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.54).
The risk difference (2.3%; 95% CI,−0.2% to 4.9%) at 20 to 30 days suggests
that 44 children would need to be treated with the long course of short-acting
antibiotics to avoid 1 treatment failure. This similarity in later outcomes
was observed for up to 3 months following therapy (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% CI,
0.90-1.50). Comparable outcomes were shown between treatment with ceftriaxone
or azithromycin, and at least 7 days of other antibiotics.Conclusion.—This meta-analysis suggests that 5 days of short-acting antibiotic use
is effective treatment for uncomplicated acute otitis media in children.
TL;DR: Seven hundred twenty-three isolates of Moraxella catarrhalis obtained from outpatients with a variety of infections in 30 medical centers in the United States between 1 November 1994 and 30 April 1995 were characterized in a central laboratory, finding strains found to be susceptible to selected oral antimicrobial agents.
Abstract: Seven hundred twenty-three isolates of Moraxella catarrhalis obtained from outpatients with a variety of infections in 30 medical centers in the United States between 1 November 1994 and 30 April 1995 were characterized in a central laboratory. The overall rate of beta-lactamase production was 95.3%. When the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards MIC interpretive breakpoints for Haemophilus influenzae were applied, percentages of strains found to be susceptible to selected oral antimicrobial agents were as follows: azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin, 100%; tetracycline and chloramphenicol, 100%; amoxicillin-clavulanate, 100%; cefixime, 99.3%; cefpodoxime, 99.0%; cefaclor, 99.4%; loracarbef, 99.0%; cefuroxime, 98.5%; cefprozil, 94.3%; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 93.5%.
TL;DR: Clinicians must be aware of local resistance patterns and the potential for fluoroquinolone treatment failures in patients with infections caused by S. pneumoniae.
Abstract: The frequency of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae has increased as fluoroquinolone administration for treatment of respiratory tract infections has increased. Levofloxacin treatment failed in a patient who had pneumococcal pneumonia and had received three previous courses of levofloxacin therapy. Susceptibility testing revealed high-level resistance to levofloxacin (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 32 μg/ml), and cross-resistance to moxifloxacin (MIC 4 μg/ml), trovafloxacin (6 μg/ml), and gatifloxacin (12 μg/ml). Sequencing of the quinolone-resistance determining region revealed a mutation of serine-81 to phenylalanine (Ser81Phe) in the gyrA region of DNA gyrase and a Ser79Phe mutation in the parC region of topoisomerase IV. The patient was treated successfully with intravenous ceftriaxone followed by oral cefprozil. Clinicians must be aware of local resistance patterns and the potential for fluoroquinolone treatment failures in patients with infections caused by S. pneumoniae.