TL;DR: Aortic annulus perimeter appears ideally suited for accurate sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, thus increasing CSA without substantial change in perimeter.
TL;DR: This is the first study to report quantitative 3D assessment of theMitral and aortic valve dynamics from matrix array transesophageal images and describe the mitral-aortic coupling in a beating human heart.
Abstract: Background— Mitral and aortic valves are known to be coupled via fibrous tissue connecting the two annuli. Previous studies evaluating this coupling have been limited to experimental animals using invasive techniques. The new matrix array transesophageal transducer provides high-resolution real-time 3D images of both valves simultaneously. We sought to develop and test a technique for quantitative assessment of mitral and aortic valve dynamics and coupling.
Methods and Results— Matrix array transesophageal (Philips iE33) imaging was performed in 24 patients with normal valves who underwent clinically indicated transesophageal echocardiography. Custom software was used to detect and track the mitral and aortic annuli in 3D space throughout the cardiac cycle, allowing automated measurement of changes in mitral and aortic valve morphology. Mitral annulus surface area and aortic annulus projected area changed reciprocally over time. Mitral annulus surface area was 8.0±2.1 cm2 at end-diastole and decreased to 7.7±2.1 cm2 in systole, reaching its maximum (10.0±2.2 cm2) at mitral valve opening. Aortic annulus projected area was 4.1±1.2 cm2 at end-diastole, then increased during isovolumic contraction reaching its maximum (4.8±1.3 cm2) in the first third of systole and its minimum (3.6±1.0 cm2) during isovolumic relaxation. The angle between the mitral and aortic annuli was maximum (136±13°) at end-diastole and decreased to its minimum value (129±11°) during systole.
Conclusions— This is the first study to report quantitative 3D assessment of the mitral and aortic valve dynamics from matrix array transesophageal images and describe the mitral-aortic coupling in a beating human heart. This ability may have impact on patient evaluation for valvular surgical interventions and prosthesis design.
Received May 19, 2008; accepted November 6, 2008.
# CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-2}
TL;DR: Real‐time MRI is used to guide the placement of a prosthetic aortic valve in the beating heart via direct apical access in eight porcine hearts to provide patients with a less morbid and more durable solution to structural heart disease.
Abstract: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery requires arresting and emptying of the heart, which compromises visualization of the surgical field. In this feasibility study a novel surgical procedure is demonstrated in which real-time MRI is used to guide the placement of a prosthetic aortic valve in the beating heart via direct apical access in eight porcine hearts. A clinical stentless bioprosthetic valve affixed to a platinum stent was compressed onto a balloon-tipped catheter. This was fed through a 15-18-mm delivery port inserted into the left ventricular (LV) apex via a minimally invasive subxyphoid incision. Using interactive real-time MRI, the surgeon implanted the prosthetic valve in the correct location at the aortic annulus within 90 s. In four of the animals immediately after implantation, ventricular function, blood flow through the valve, and myocardial perfusion were evaluated with MRI. MRI-guided beating-heart surgery may provide patients with a less morbid and more durable solution to structural heart disease.
TL;DR: Comparative, nonrandomized studies of aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless valves suggest that the risk of cardiac death is reduced with stent less valves and the rates of valve‐related complications also appear to be lower.
Abstract: The implantation of stentless porcine valves (SPVs) is technically more demanding than implantation of stented bioprosthetic valves. Implantation of the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis requires an,understanding of the relationships between the leaflets and the aortic annulus and sinotubular junction. In addition to proper alignment of the three commissures within the aortic root, the diameter of sinotubular junction should not exceed the external diameter of the porcine aortic valve after completion of the operation. The Medtronic Freestyle porcine aortic root bioprosthesis can be used for subcoronary implantation as well as for aortic root replacement. Degenerative calcification of a tricuspid aortic valve is the most common cause of aortic valve disease in older patients. Implantation of stentless valves in the subcoronary position is usually feasible because the geometry of the aortic root is well maintained in these patients. The bicuspid aortic valve is the second most common cause of aortic valve disease in older patients and the most common in younger patients. These patients frequently have dilated aortic root, and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis is ideal for implantation using the root inclusion technique. Stentless porcine bioprostheses are minimally obstructive and associated with low mean systolic gradients. In addition, they have better hemodynamic performance during exercise than stented bioprostheses. For these reasons, patient-prosthesis mismatch has not been described with stentless valves. Left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement appears to be better with stentless than with stented bioprostheses. Comparative, nonrandomized studies of aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless valves suggest that the risk of cardiac death is reduced with stentless valves and the rates of valve-related complications also appear to be lower. What remains unknown is whether stentless valves are more durable than stented ones.